April 08, 2012

Red Ken. Hero?

(Guest post from Gaius)
In praise of Ken Livingstone (yes, really)
Ken Livingstone might be on the demented fringe of the loony left but he's no moron when it comes to his own tax affairs and paying as little tax as possible. With the release of his tax details it appears red Ken has done everything legally possible to minimise his own personal tax liability. London's mayoral candidate is clearly a tax avoider, which I must make clear is perfectly legal and above board, it simply means arranging your affairs within the law to minimise your liability.
In fact Ken should be praised for his avoidance, after all the govt will only waste his money in exactly the same way that they do with everyone else's by spending it on white elephant high speed rail links, illegal wars and the mass murder of innocent foreigners and a "big brother" surveillance state right out of George Orwell's 1984. So, well done Ken.
However, all is not well in the in the la-la land of Kens loony left stupidity. Ken has actively railed against tax avoidance, this rank hypocrisy is typical of the socialist mindset whereby tax is only for the little people and not their rightful masters.
But the little people are starting to wake up, The LabourUncut blog has already mentioned that 31% of Labour supporters will not be voting for the tax avoiding hypocrite. After all, you can't fool all of the people all of the time.
The day of reckoning is getting closer and closer for all the two-faced sanctimonious shysters.


Captain Ranty said...


A tricky one this.

One the one hand, Ken is an odious little toad with almost no redeeming features, yet on the other, I have a grudging admiration for anyone prepared to hang on to their earnings.

I am a firm Starve the Beast supporter.

I am also now torn.



Anonymous said...

Ken is an antismoker.

I don't need to know anything more about him. I don't mind if people are left or right, boy or girl, black or white. But if they're antismokers, that's the end.

Jim said...

Ken promised to make London " A beacon for Islam "
Plus Ken's views on jews were horrendous.
So I couldn't support him.
Oh and his tax avoidance schemes haven't been tested in court yet so he might still get done by HMRC

Anonymous said...

I'm not torn either, Captain. ;-)

Ken is a cunt and always has been. There are many, many cunts in politics but few exhibit the sheer amount of cuntitude that Ken does, irrespective of the fact that he has reduced the amount he pays to the ferryman.

The beast is not starved by this because Ken is part of it and serves to perpetuate it. He is a politican, after all. He has wasted everyone else's money numerous times already, just as they all do. This particular bit of theatre is costing £21 million after all and the same shite is coming to an EU region near you very soon. (Note, that £21m is the amount apparently required just to run the election and has nothing to do with the campaign financing. The official source for that is here as a PDF. )

The beast is doing fine.

The only thing the 31% have cottoned onto is that Ken is a cunt. They would happily vote for someone else who wasn't a cunt but as they have realised Ken is a cunt, and they aren't going to be "given the opportunity" to vote for someone from their side who in their minds isn't a cunt, they're merely going elsewhere or will be staying in.

Unfortunately, figuring out that Ken is a cunt does little to make people realise the fundamental absurdity that they are engaged in.



coz said...

Do they ever stop creating 'new' highly paid positions for running-dog lackeys? One's cadres are innately entitled to huge salaried non-jobs, surely?

Gaius said...



I only want to praise him for limiting the amount of money he has to give to the state and also for making himself look like a massive hypocrite.

I'd never vote for the odious little cunt either.

His tax avoidance is perfectly legal.

Didn't realise he was an anti smoking zeolot either, but I still don't want to fuck him!!!

Realising Ken is a cunt is the first step on an admittedly long road, some will continue to walk this road with us.

There is a limit to how much the state can borrow and tax, a limit that has already been reached.

Anonymous said...

How does the pope fit in all this ? Is there a tug of war going on here ?. Some of this I understand, but there are some areas which I am still joining the dots, so to speak


Anonymous said...


If you do some digging you'll find that the pontiff maximus was the name given to the Roman Caesar. It's also the name given to the pope. The Holy Roman Empire was the continuation of the Roman. The Roman elites had their power from the wealth they'd acquired from their ancestors who ruled in Babylon, Mesopotamia and Sumer. The elite families in Europe are their descendents. The power pyramid has remained the same since those days.

Move on and you'll find the balance of power shifted to the Rothschilds whom through their scheming control, at least 75% of the world's wealth, very possibly far more.

The following quote is very important:

“In 1492, Chemor, chief Rabbi of Spain, wrote to the Grand Sanhedrin, which had its seat in Constantinople, for advice, when a Spanish law threatened expulsion. This was the reply:

Beloved brethren in Moses, we have received your letter in which you tell us of the anxieties and misfortunes which you are enduring. We are pierced by as great pain to hear it as yourselves.

The advice of the Grand Satraps and Rabbis is the following:

1. As for what you say that the King of Spain 3 obliges you to become Christians: do it, since you cannot do otherwise.

2. As for what you say about the command to despoil you of your property: make your sons merchants that they may despoil, little by little, the Christians of theirs.

3. As for what you say about making attempts on your lives: make your sons doctors and apothecaries, that they may take away Christians’ lives.

4. As for what you say of their destroying your synagogues: make your sons canons and clerics in order that they may destroy their churches.

5. As for the many other vexations you complain of: arrange that your sons become advocates and lawyers, and see that they always mix in affairs of State, that by putting Christians under your yoke you may dominate the world and be avenged on them.

6. Do not swerve from this order that we give you, because you will find by experience that, humiliated as you are, you will reach the actuality of power."

(Signed) PRINCE OF THE JEWS OF CONSTANTINOPLE.” (L. Fry, Waters Flowing Eastward: The War Against the Kingship of Christ. TBR Books, Washington, D. C., (2000), pp. 51-52;

As already said, freemasonry is Jewish. Masonry wasn't bit it was infiltrated by Jews, the elites. Throughout history Jews have been expelled from some 84 lands. This was the direct result of their parasitism and political agitation. They have never integrated but have always formed ghettos. Because of Jewish ethnocentrism, they will always live apart from the Goyim.

Point 4 above cofirms my beliefs that the Vatican was infiltrated by Judaism. It makes perfect sense that the only way a minority could ever gain control of the majority is to infiltrate their establishments and rewrite the rules. A prime example is the USA's constitution today is being rewritten so to speak, to change freedoms in order to remove hate speech. Regardless what one's views on hate speech, it's still speech and should be 100% free. It is therefore within the Jew's best interests that they control all walks of a society and make the rules so as to not be evicted, yet again, from another land.

People will view this as hatred of Jews, which it isn't. However it must be said that without evidence, the criticism of another people is prejudice, yet the writing is on the wall when it comes to criticising world Jewry, for their conspiring is well documented in the annals of history. Of course, the MSM doesn't promote this for obvious reasons, but please, people cannot attack those who correctly criticise Judaism as being haters, for they are merely joining the dots and seeing the picture painted by powerful Jews, of their creation of a New Jewish World Order.



Anonymous said...

Oops, the above reply to Del should read:




Anonymous said...

Also Del,

What I truly and utterly find so repulsive, abhorrent and insidious is the clever manipulation of society by the elites (Jews) that should anyone start joining the dots and realising that this most certainly has a lot to do with the Jews, then guaranteed the hate speech laws will instantly shut them down.

Everything in life has an agenda. It doesn't just happen. WW2 started not because Hitler invaded Poland but because the Jews were livid that Hitler had done exactly what Abraham Lincoln had tried to do before him and JFK after him. That is, he put an end to the control of the banks and printing of money by private organistions (the Jews), holding the people in total debt slavery. It was the Jews who started WW2, as they had all other conflicts for the last 200+ years. They tried to put a world wide boycott on German goods being sold and demanded they all be allowed back into their old positions within the banks, judiciary, government, education systems etc in order to continue their parasitism over the German people. They knew that Germany needed to export its goods in order to import 2/3ds of its food supply, therefore, if they continue with their boycott, eventually Germany will starve and give the Jews their old jobs back. And to understand what Germany was like before Hitler came to power, well, it was a hell for the German people who were dying under Jewish debt control of their land. We are not told about this in history class. I wonder why? We are also not told that throughout the USA and other lands, Jews got together to smash windows and set fire to shops that had the German labels on their goods. The Germans had no choice but to fight back or face starvation. Thus, the propaganda of the Jewish star of David being stamped on the doors of Jews was not to show hatred but to tell Germans to STOP BUYING GOODS FROM JEWISH RETAILERS. Perfectly understandable when one considered the clime at the time.

Again, there will be a far larger majority who will not even want to contemplate what I've written because there's the overwhelming fact that they lost family members, fighting to liberate Europe from the Nazis. Then there's the massive propaganda of the holocaust as wel, hammered into the psyche of westerners from a young age. Ask yourself a couple of questions: You know that history is a lie, therefore, just how much of what we know of Hitler and the Nazis is infact truth? What if Hitler was infact the last hope the west (world even!) ever had of breaking free from the control of Jewish usury and their continued attempts at creating a New World Order? What if the continuing demonisation of the Nazis is so in order to stop people ever contemplating that what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf was in fact the last hope to save mankind from the control of an incredibly prejudice group of people who see themselves as God's chosen and seek to destroy 90%+ of the population?

Bottom line, we have been played terribly, to the point that we will not question our assassins for fear of upsetting and offending. We are happily obliterating what is our culture and our people (and in due process waging war on others and destroying theirs) in order to satisfy a small percentage of the world's population, who through their nefarious ways have been hated for their attempted controls of the societies they live in, even though they make up a tiny percentage of that land's minority. The dots have been joined up and it's understandable why things happened the way they did and why people feel the way they do.



Anonymous said...

Thanks for the reply, and the 'pointer' in the right direction.
Your old blog was a good read, and at times did wonder what the fook you was on about, but now through spending the time to look, understand
more of the history. Thanks again


Anonymous said...

Thanks to the Capt for using the blog as a social network site :)


Anonymous said...


I think you're most certainly not alone in wondering what I was on about at times. When one reads something that seems totally bizarre, shock and bewilderment creep into the train of thought, especially when what you've just been told something totally different to what you know. However, that said, it's the little nudge that sets people off in the right direction.

We put far too much trust into people we know nothing about, whom we allow ourselves to believe what they've just taught us through their books on history. We have allowed others the freedom to manipulate our psyche to the point we accept what they tell us and damn anyone else who believes otherwise. This is the control of humanity that despots throughout history have dreamed of. Slavery starts the day one stops questioning.

There's nothing more I'd like than to believe the history I was taught was true. In doing that, I'd be sound in the knowledge that honesty prevailed. If only that were the case.

And cap'n, I second Del and must thank you for allowing me to go off topic. Thank you.



Anonymous said...

London is a tax haven for foreign businesses anyway. Nice to see someone local getting in on the action.