December 09, 2011

The Crown Has Spoken!

Things are hotting up!

Just received a letter from the Procurator Fiscal. It is short and to the point.

Dear Sir,


I refer to your letter received here on 7 December 2011. The terms of the Conditional Offer are quite clear. If you decide not to accept the offer, you will be prosecuted in Court.


Yours faithfully


Procurator Fiscal

My reply, which I posted about ten minutes ago was also short and to the point:



Dear Sir

I refer to your letter dated 8/12/11.

The terms of my offer are equally clear.

You have no authority over me and no jurisdiction in this case. I reiterate that should you invite me to court you will be obliged to pay my fee.

Without Vexation-Without Frivolity-Without Prejudice-Non-Assumpsit

Errors & Omissions Excepted


My mark

He has two choices: drop it, or ask me to attend court. I am prepared for either outcome.

I also received another letter from a DCA. The same one chasing that £31.00 from last year. That Sky thing.

In big, bold red lettering it says:

FINAL OFFER-IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED

DEADLINE FOR FURTHER ACTION: 7 DAYS.

"As a gesture of goodwill, our client will accept £23.25 as full & final payment for the above debt providing payment is received in our office by 16th December 2011. Please note that this is a Time Barred Offer. If payment is not received by the above date then the settlement figure will be revoked and no such offer will be made again".

(They then go on to tell me how I can pay them).

I responded thusly:

FINAL OFFER-IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED BY YOU



9 December 2011

Dear DCA

As a gesture of goodwill, I will accept the sum of £5,000 (five thousand pounds) as full and final payment for the harassment you have visited upon me.

This is a Time Barred Offer and you must settle within 30 (thirty days) of receipt of this Notice.

Failure to make payment to me will cause the figure to double to £10,000 (ten thousand pounds).

In the spirit of fair play, however, I will agree to pay £23.25 as soon as you send me a copy of the contract signed between DCA and Captain Ranty.

As I have said repeatedly, I have never heard of you. 

I am now tired of telling you that I verbally cancelled the contract with Sky in good time. That they cannot find a record of this conversation is no concern of mine.

Leave me alone or suffer the consequences.



Without frivolity, ill-will or vexation,

(my mark)

I forgot to tell you that when I was in Namibia Mrs Ranty told me that they had sent a letter promising to send in the burly men. I contacted the DCA and told them that I was abroad and that they should stay the hell away from my family. They did not appear.


So, two fights picked, they shot first and I have returned fire, let's see what happens next.

I am kind of looking forward to the court thing, if it happens.

CR.

34 comments:

The Talking Clock said...

Brave man.

Know how you feel, with me having my own fight with the banksters (who think the laws of this country, at statute and at common law, do not apply to them).

Nerve wracking, stressful... but when you know you're in the right, there's just no backing down.

Good luck, obviously! TTC

Captain Ranty said...

Thanks TTC.

As confident as I am (no bravery here!), I know that they can (and may) simply ignore the fact that I am stood there in the court, they can (and may) simply pronounce a judgement and then all get up and leave.

As this is my first show, I am not sure what they will do.

They have to inform me of the time and date, and I have a few arrows left in my quiver to fire at them.

CR.

lazy said...

arrows? get the cannon out. There's dozens of freemen out there who'll attend if they can. The more the merrier(men)
keep us informed
lazy

FireballXL5 said...

It's getting interesting now Capt.

How far are you prepared to go with this if they get you in to court and ignore your defence, as they are likely to do in steamrollering their own agenda through regardless.

The ultimate sanction, I guess, if you "disobey" their rules is a spell in chokey.

Speaking for myself, I wold happily spend a few weeks at Madges pleasure rather than rolling over and falling in to line. At the end of the day what can they do, shoot you? chop an arm off? They get away with it because of the fear factor, if a lot more of us "lost the fear" this country would soon be in a better place.

Best of luck Capt. onward to victory and freedom!

Captain Ranty said...

lazy,

Arrows will do until/unless I end up in court.

I have thought about this. I think my first visit should be solo. I picked the fight so I will turn up in the playground. It's my responsibilty and I will take what comes.

Ultimately, we are alone anyway.

CR.

Captain Ranty said...

FB,

Gaol is acceptable, if they get all pernickety. I am not certain that a custodial sentence is applicable though. They will chase the money first. And if they do that, I have a shitload of stuff to put them through before they get a single penny.

Thanks for the good wishes!

CR.

Dioclese said...

You will not be sent to jail (I refuse to use the American spelling of that word).

If they try, appeal. This will drag on for years. In the end go to the European Court of Human Rights which overrules the Supreme Court. They'll drop it because it's politically unacceptable to expose that fact.

It worked for me and Gordon.

If they don't write this off then it will cost them a damn site more than it costs you. Fuck 'em!

Captain Ranty said...

Dioclese,

Thanks! I'll take this as far as I can. Not sure I would want to rely on the ECHR as I don't recognise them either.

BTW, gaol is a 13th Century Norman/Midle English word. Long before the USA was borned.

Look:

http://www.20kweb.com/etymology_dictionary_G/origin_of_the_word_gaol_jail.htm

and:

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=jail

It's prison we need to avoid using. They are only found on ships.

CR.

F***W*T TW****R said...

Brilliant, use their tactics against them. I'll also make sure that if I cancel on the telling bone I'll follow up with a registered letter.

Oldrightie said...

Just imagine a 2012 when CR turns us all into freemen and we quit the bloody EU!

Captain Ranty said...

FT,

In hindsight, it was a basic error, but in mitigation, their machine told me that it would record the conversation.

Mind you, they could just as easily deny that they got a letter. (Unless, as you say, you register it). Good tip.

I have been sending registered post to the gubmint though. They are liars of note.

CR.

Captain Ranty said...

OR,

We may dream, may we not? They can't take that away, or tax it.

Yet.

CR.

NewsboyCap said...

captain

Yesterday I received a County court pack, demanding £115, for not sorning my bike.
I have drafted a 'notice'informing them that I shall not pay or submit to their demands, due to my Lawful standing. Included a fee schedule for them to pay me in Silver. And to end the nonsense or invite me to their Common Law court, before a jury of my peers.
They have ten days to reply one way or t'other.

Captain Ranty said...

Newsy,

Good for you!

You should also consider sending this notice:

Letter to Claimant

[Your name and address]
[Claimant’s name and address]
[Date: ]

Dear [insert claimant/court name here],

Further to your [letter/notice/summons etc] dated [date] ref [their reference] I bring to your attention that the following FOUNDATION EVIDENCE for your claim is missing:

• PROOF of CLAIM.
• PROOF OF AUTHORITY.

I have not given my consent to be governed or policed.

This appears to be a tort conversion.

Please note: Legislation, Acts of Parliament, FORCE used and common practice are all claims made upon me, however they are neither PROOF of CLAIM nor PROOF of AUTHORITY. The only proof they provide is proof of FORCE.

If you choose to progress this matter, you should be aware that I shall summons witness evidence in court, demanding Proof of Claim and Proof of Authority that you (or someone, somewhere - anyone, anywhere) have a higher claim upon me than me – without my consent. I shall also file a Statutory Declaration to that effect.

If you do not furnish me with the FOUNDATION EVIDENCE listed above within the statutory twenty (20) working days and still pursue me for this matter, please be aware that I shall summons it accordingly. I shall also OBJECT in court to the complete lack of FOUNDATION EVIDENCE, real evidence, illustrative evidence, demonstrative evidence, witness evidence or documentary evidence regarding your claim and I will counterclaim, citing (civil) crimes including but not limited to; TORT CONVERSION, INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS (IIED), MALFEASANCE/MISFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE and MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.

Yours sincerely,

(Template courtesy of the Lioness).


Get them to prove their claim and their authority and then you can do as they ask.

They can never prove either of them.

CR.

NewsboyCap said...

captain
cheers for that I shall look up the lioness.

Stealthy said...

Meow! hmmm think I may have mixed up the last two articles :D

NewsboyCap said...

captain

Apparently the Secretary of state for transport,x2, the DVLA, the Crown and the County court all have a claim on me.If I loose in court (no chance) I am considering sending them all £23 worth of tobacco for their enjoyment.
Can you point me in the direction of the Lioness, purely for research purposes.
cheers

Captain Ranty said...

Here you go:

http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/so-they-say-you%E2%80%99ve-broken-the-law-challenging-legal-authority/18485231?productTrackingContext=search_results/search_shelf/center/1

CR.

James Higham said...

Who needs the cinema?

Captain Ranty said...

Hollywood, I suspect....

CR.

Anonymous said...

Best wishes from me. This may be the very thing that brings enlightenment to the ignorant, and fuels the awakening of yet more people to the oppressive system that has been deliberately and maliciously woven all around us. Give them hell.

An Angry Man

Barking Spider said...

Give 'em hell, CR. ;-)

Captain Ranty said...

Will do Spidey!

Captain Ranty said...

AAM,

Thanks!

I'll do me best.

CR.

bollixed said...

Just catching up on my blog reads. Nice one Captain. I will follow this with much interest as I'm on a similar vein with various entities out there. I feel a promotion to Major might be in the pipeline. :)

Antony said...

"It is patently impossible to discuss social engineering or the automation of a society, i.e., the engineering of social automation systems (silent weapons) on a national or worldwide scale without implying extensive objectives of social control and destruction of human life, i.e., slavery and genocide.

This manual is in itself an analog declaration of intent. Such a writing must be secured from public scrutiny. Otherwise, it might be recognized as a technically formal declaration of domestic war."


I know you have tons of things sent to you to read but really you should have a look at this. In fact all of you should.

http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/sw4qw

tinks said...

Best wishes with this CR.

I watch your endeavours with some awe. Knowledge is power, and right is wasted on the righteous.

The right to be left alone is a precious one.

George Speller said...

Best of luck cap'n. Keep it coming.

nominedeus said...

Go for the throat Cap'n your day is dawning...best of m8!

coz said...

This looks kinda promising, (US style) or it cheered me up anyway - it's like people are getting the message about the difference between a corporate legal identity and a living being.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&hl=en&v=-M54Z-Bzgcw&gl=US

pitano1 said...

Lord Diplock in Att-Gen v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [1974], ante, outlines the various ways which the due administration of justice might be prejudiced: "The due administration of justice requires first that all citizens should have unhindered access to the constitutionally established courts of criminal or civil jurisdiction for the determination of disputes as their legal rights and liabilities; secondly, that they should be able to rely upon obtaining in the courts the arbitrament of a tribunal which is free from bias against any party and whose decision will be based upon those facts only that have been proved in evidence adduced before it in accordance with the procedure adopted in courts of law; and thirdly that, once the dispute has been submitted to a court of law, they should be able to rely upon there being no usurpation by any other person of the function of the court to decide according to law. Conduct which is calculated to prejudice any of these requirements or to undermine public confidence that they will be observed is contempt of court"

pitano1 said...

ki.capt.

made a bit of balls up of last post.

anyway,heres the sequel..

i dont want to put a spoiler on any of your future posts,so i will ask,`do you know how HALSBURYS LAWS OF ENGLAND,describes these so called courts.ie magistrates/admiralty/ignorant pigs.?

also dont forget they can ALL be subjected to an AFFIDAFIT.

i refused to play ball with the swine a few months ago,and they demande £800.quid,i refused,and got 21 days plus i night for contempt of court.

came out i week later fit as a butchers dog,but gasping for a smoke.l.o.l.

remember these creatures all suffer from cognitive dissodance,and probably wont realise the jig is up until they look round,and there asses are on fire.
SHOW THEM THE LAW.CAPT

k said...

Capitan - I'm doing my best to starve the beast, I have a problem, could you please e-mail me - your tutoring will help us all, and thank you for not buggering off.

Katie said...

http://loveovermind.wordpress.com/2012/01/20/skype-group-chat/

google "denique Ultimatum Revereor Verum" if you want the ring to rule them all...promise

katierene@live.ca if you have any questions how I beat everything they had to throw at me...no debts, erased etc...much love, katie