November 14, 2010

The Greatest Lie Ever Told

 This is a mammoth post. It has to be. With a title like that, you would hardly expect an explanation in two paragraphs.

I nicked the whole thing from here. A pal called Tony emailed me some fascinating links and I am building a post based on his findings. I just thought that today, of all days, whilst we are remembering things, it would do us no harm to look back in history to find out why we are "managed" the way we are.

You might want to put a pot of coffee on.

Here you go:

"The government and legal system of the United States, Canada, Austraila, New Zealand and or course Britain, is totally controlled by the Crown. I have also stated that the British Monarch is not the Crown. The Crown is the Inner City of London, which is an independent State in London belonging to the Vatican system. It is a banking cartel which has a massive system around and beneath, which hides its true power The City is in fact the Knights Templar Church, also known as the Crown Temple or Crown Templar, and is located between Fleet Street and Victoria Embankment. The Temple grounds are also home to the Crown Offices at Crown Office Row.

The Crown Temple controls the Global 'Legal' system, including those in the United States, Canada, Australia, and much more; this is because all Bar Associations are franchises of the International Bar Association at the Inns of Court at Crown Temple based at Chancery Lane in London. All Bar Associations are franchises of the Crown and all Bar Attorneys/ Barristers throughout the world pledge a solemn oath to the Temple, even though many may not be aware that this is what they are doing. Bar Association 'licensed' Solicitors / Barristers must keep to their Oath, Pledge and terms of allegiance to the Crown Temple if they are to be "called to the Bar" and work in the legal profession. The ruling Monarch is also subordinate to the Crown Temple, this as been so since the reign of King John in the 13th century when Royal Sovereignty was transferred to the Crown Temple and, through this, to the Roman Church. King John 1167-1216 is the key to this deception.

It was at the Chancel, or Chancery, of the Crown Inner Temple Court in January 1215 that King John was faced with the demands of the French/English Barons in England (mainly French), to confirm the rights enshrined in the Magna Carta. When he signed the Magna Carta in 1215 history records this as an event that extended human freedom, but the real affect was very different as we shall see. The governments of the USA, Canada, Australia and more are subsidiaries of the Crown Temple and so is the US Central Bank the Federal Reserve, as are all Central Banks on the Planet and including the IMF` World Bank.

Bar Associations are awarded their franchises by the Four Inns of Court at Temple Bar. These are the Inner Temple, Middle Temple, Lincolns Inn and Greys Inn and they are nothing less than elite secret societies without charters or statutes. They are the law unto themselves. The Inner Temple controls the legal system franchise for Canada and Britain while the Middle Temple does the same for the United States. Queen Elizabeth II is a member of both Temples. At least five signatories to the American Declaration of Independence were Temple Bar Attorneys who had pledged allegiance to the Crown! Another Middle Temple operative during the formation of the USA was Alexander Hamilton who structured the American Banking system to fulfil the Crown Temples agenda for total control of the United States. So in truth a State wherever it is on this planet, is a legal entity of the Temple Crown, or a Crown Colony. A man named Michael Edwards wrote:

"Americans were fooled into believing that the legal Crown Colonies comprising New England were independent nation states, but they never were nor are today. They were and still are |Colonies of the Crown Temple, through letters patent and charters, who have no legal authority to be independent from the rule and order of the Crown Temple. A legal state is a Crown Temple Colony."

"Neither the American people nor the Queen of Britain own America. The Crown Temple owns America through the deception of those who have sworn their allegiance by oath to the Middle Temple Bar. The Crown Bankers and their Middle Templar Attorneys rule America through unlawful contracts, unlawful Taxes, and contract documents of false equity through debt deceit, all strictly enforced by their completely unlawful, but' legal', orders, rules and codes of the Crown Temple Courts, or so called 'Judiciary' in America. This is because the Crown Temple holds the land titles and estate deeds to all of North America."

Seven Middle Inn Templars who had pledged an oath of allegiance to the Crown Temple (including Alexander Hamilton) were among the members of the Constitutional Convention who signed the completed 'American Constitution'. How symbolic it is that copies of the American Constitution and the Declaration of Independence hang on the wall of the Middle Temple in London. It's not that surprising when you consider this Temple controlled both sides in these shenanigans.

So while the Middle Bar Templars were orchestrating the illusion of freedom from the perceived rule by King George III, the King too, was a sworn member of the same Temple. Michael Edwards continues:
"1776 is the year that will truly live in infamy for all Americans. It is the year that the Crown Colonies became legal Crown States. The Declaration of Independence was a legal, not lawful, document. It was signed on both sides by representatives of the Crown Temple. Legally, it announced the status quo of the Crown Colonies to that of the new legal name called 'States' as direct possessive estates of the Crown.

"The American people were hoodwinked into thinking they were declaring lawful independence from the Crown. Proof that the colonies are still in Crown possession is the use of the word 'State' to signify a 'legal estate of possession.' Had this been a document of and by the people, both the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution would have been written using the word 'States'. By the use of 'State', the significance of government of estate possessions was legally established. All of the North American States are Crown Templar possessions through their legal document, signed by their representation of both parties to the contract, known as the Constitution of the United States of America.

Who controls the Crown?

On May 15th 1213, King John, puppet of the Knights Templar, effectively signed away the Kingdom of England and Ireland to Pope Innocent III and the Roman Church, witnessed by the Crown Templars. As King John said at the time:

"I myself bearing witness in the house of the Knights Templars."

The King John Charter said:

" We wish it to be known to all of you, through this our charter, furnished with our seal… not induced by force or compelled by fear, but of our own good and spontaneous will and by common councle of our Barons, do offer and freely concede to God and his Holy Apostles Peter and Paul and to our mother the holy Roman Church, and to our lord Pope Innocent and to his Catholic successors, the whole kingdom of England and the whole kingdom of Ireland, with all their rights and appurtenances… we perform and swear fealty for them to him are aforesaid lord pope Innocent, and his Catholic successors and the Roman Church…
binding our successors and our heirs by our wife forever, in a similar manner to perform fealty and show homage to him who shall be chief pontiff at the time, and to the Roman church without demur. As a sign… we will and establish perpetual obligation and concession… from the proper and especial revenues of our aforesaid kingdoms…
the Roman church shall receive yearly a thousand marks sterling… saving to us and to our heirs our rights, liberties and regalia; all of which things, as they have been described above, we wish to have perpetually valid and firm; and we bind ourselves and our successors not to act counter to them. And if we or any of our successors shall presume to attempt this, whoever he be, unless being duly warned he come to his kingdom, and his senses, he shall lose his right to the kingdom, and this charter of our obligation and concession shall always remain firm."

Now it gets interesting. Historical accounts concentrate the fact that this charter obliged the Crown to pay money to the Roman Church, but it also states that if the terms of the charter are broken, the 'right to the kingdom' shall be lost. When King John signed the Magna Carter on June 15th 1215 he broke the terms of the charter with the Pope and therefore lost the right to his Kingdom. Pope Innocent III then declared the Magna Carter null and void. From this time the 'Crown' passed from the Monarch to the Knights Templar who to this day, governs Britain on behalf of the Roman Illuminati Church.
The St Clair's now Sinclair are the initial directors of this link of Templar and Rome in the British Isles as they took hold in Scotland at the time of the 1066 Norsemen-Norman invasion. This means, if we take it a stage further, that ultimately, through the CrownTemple, the Roman system also owns the United States, Canada and all countries and Bar associations controlled both overtly and covertly by the Crown. This is why the Peace Treaty between the American Colonies and the British Crown in 1783, stated:

"It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the third, by the grace of God, King of Great Britain, France and Ireland, defender of the faith, Duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc… and of the United States of America…"

And for the Irony, a Roman Catholic is barred from being the British Monarch while all along the Monarch and the Kingdom have been owned by the system that is Rome.

The Queen is the Grand Patroness of Freemasonry. She is served by the 390 members of the Privy Council which connects with its equivalent in all other Commonwealth Countries. The Privy Council is 'LEGALLY' above Parliament because of its prerogative powers. Its members, who are appointed for life, include Prince Philip, Prince Charles, the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Prime Minister and many others. They hold nine official meetings each year and the government (Crown) minister's stand to attention while the Queen is told of the government measures they are asking the Queen to approve, which are nothing other than what the Crown dictates via the elected leader and via the Whips of whichever political party has power... After taking their bow to the Queen and shaking her hand they are sworn to conduct their business in the utmost secrecy.
Another network of this structure is the CROWN AGENTS. Formed in 1833 as 'Crown Agents for the Colonies,' to run the day to day administration of the empire and to serve as private bankers to government officials, colonial authorities, and heads of state. It is also an older version of Brown & Root supplying a vast range of goods throughout the empire. Goods that included arms, drugs, Viruses, especially to Africa to create the genocidal wars we are, and have witnessed. The Crown Agents is the network that links the CrownTemple to the organised crime operations throughout the empire, the Golden Dawn being one of the most powerful occult operations to be used in Britain amongst the crime syndicates to ensure the right crime waves are in full swing as and when required.

We can see this in the current agenda with guns. The Golden Dawn also operates within legal organisations, but is the interconnecting network across all secret societies and religion. Remember the Crown Agents work directly for the Monarch who works for the Knights Templar Church, which operates for the Vatican, and for added insult the Crown Agents entire debt is guaranteed by the British Government, that means you! In the 1970's it was bailed out by the Bank of England costing hundreds of millions of pounds. For many years the Crown Agents managed the personal wealth of the Sultan of Brunei who just happens to be a great friend of the Queen, and has funded many of Prince Philips, Prince Charles, and father George Bush's private projects. The Sultan is also the financier of both British and American unofficial intelligence operations as he has backed many of Mohammed Al Fayed's operations, in fact the Sultan could be said to be Mohammed Al Fayed! After the murder of Princess Diana the role of Al Fayed was for him to hijack the conspiracy and thus lead investigators down the Al Fayed rap of mis-information as was done with Nick Brown over the top up fees debate, and is currently being played by David Davis. Fortunately no one needed to go to him for information because we all in our hearts already know she was murdered.

In 1996 the Crown Agents was privatised with the name Crown Agents for Overseas Government and Administration LTD. Of course privatisation is nothing but transfer of Power from CrownTemple through Government agency to CrownTemple via direct ownership; they own everything in this nation!

Just to give an idea of What the Crown Agencies controls here's a couple of little companies it controls as it acts as a holding company for:

Barclays bank
Standard and Chartered bank
Unilever
Tate and Lyle
Securicor
British Telecom
The Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum
Aga Khan Foundation

I think you get the picture; it's big to say the least.

It manages the customs services of Mozambique, and through a company called Europe SA, is in charge of all economic construction procurement for Bosnia. It is also in joint venture with Monaco based company ES-KO, to provide all the food for United Nations peace keeping forces in Angola and Bosnia. With this you can see the more war the more profit for the Crown Agents, and if it goes tits up no problem the British Taxpayer will foot the bill!!!!

The queen of England owns the 40.000 acre Duchy of Lancaster, the 44.000 acre Duchy of Cornwall which gives Charles his income. In truth it is the Crown that owns these assets which are assigned to the ruling monarch, so long as they do as they are told. The Crown it transpires owns land in the UK to the tune of 40 million acres. The Queen owns over 300 residencies around the country, and invests heavily in corporations like Rio Tinto Zinc (RTZ), Royal Dutch Shell, ICI, and General Electric. This is no surprise in that these companies are 100% Illuminati operations.

Rio Tinto is the largest mining company in the world and was established in 1873 by Hugh Matheson of the Global drug running operation Jardine Matheson. Rio Tinto was in at the start of the North Sea Oil, along with Texaco. They used the refineries of BP in which the Queen also has massive investments, so now you know where all the revenues from the North Sea oil reserves went, to the CrownTemple. This shows insider dealing on an individual basis enabling the Queen to make massive profits.
Another blatant conflict of interest to have been identified was Rio Tinto's involvement in a cartel formed in 1971 to fix the price of Uranium. A Federal grand jury and the 1976 US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, chaired by Frank Church, exposed the sting. It also included a company called Mary Kathleen Uranium of Australia. This company had been secretly encouraging the Aborigines to occupy Uranium rich lands in Australia to take these lands out of production to raise the price on the world market. The manipulated shortage of Uranium had a serious effect on the American Westinghouse company who sought to take legal action against Rio Tinto for price rigging.
This strategy has been used in the USA against the Native Americans and throughout Africa. An American court ordered that Rio Tinto officials answer questions, but this was quashed by the British Law Lords. The Australian government passed legislation to the same effect. This was after the Australian Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam, had been dismissed from office by the Queens Governor General of Australia, Sir John Kerr. Whitlam was pursuing a policy of buying out the mining and raw material cartels, like Rio Tinto and Anglo American, to stop them raping Australia's resource base, while giving nothing in return.
The Queen having enormous investments in both companies, removed Whitlam by using some of her wide range of prerogative powers, which by the way she has in all commonwealth countries including Britain, which she can instigate when the Crown deem necessary, but of course in the minds of the masses the Queen has no powers today? Well I suppose she doesn't in that she is a puppet of the CrownTemple and ultimately to the Roman system. Sir John Kerr, a former high level operative of British Intelligence, was made a member of the Privy Council and the Royal Victorian Order for his loyal and most profitable service to the Queens portfolio.
He was later murdered however, when the truth about the removal of Gough Whitlam was in danger of coming out, how they look after their own! He was obviously outer circle and a good man and would have exposed the lies of the inner circle. The Crown Cartels continue through a House of Windsor extremely secretive society called the Club of the Isles. It was named after King Edward VII, Queen Victoria's son, who was the first to carry the title, Prince of the Isles.

The title is held today by Prince Charles. Edward was heavily involved with the Black Nobility barons of the square mile London Financial District and helped them to engineer the Crimean War, the Russia - Japan War, the preparations for the First World War, and the Opium Wars against China. Through the central organisation of the Club of the Isles comes the fantastic web of interlocking directorships which hold apparently 'independent' companies in a network of common control and agenda. Part of the web includes:

The Bank of England
Anglo American Corporation of South Africa
Rio Tinto
Minorco Minerals and Resources Corp
De Beers Consolidated Mines
De Beers Centenary AG
N.M Rothschilds Bank
Barclays Bank
Lloyds Bank
Lloyds Insurance Market
HSBC Bank
National Westminster Bank
Barings Bank
Schroders bank
Standard Chartered Bank
Hambros Bank
S.G Warburg
Toronto Dominion Bank
Johnson Matthey
Kleinwort Benson Group
Lazard Brothers
Lohnro
J.P Morgan and CO
Morgan Grenfell Group
British Petroleum
Shell and Royal Dutch Petroleum
Cadbury - Schweppes
Bat Industries
Assicurazioni Generali SpA (VeniceItaly)
Courtaulds
General Electric
Cazeenove and Co
Grand Metropolitan
Hanson PLC
HSBS (Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank)
Imperial and Chemical Industries (ICI)
Inchscape PLC
Inco LTD
ING Group
Jardine Matheson
Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation & Co (P & O ferries)
Pilkington Glass
Reuters Holdings
Glaxo Wellcome
Smithkline Beecham
Unilever and UnileverNV
Vickers PLC.

This is just a few of them. In 1999 Lonrho had 640 subsidiary companies itself; it has many more now, all these companies and more have staggering amounts of subsidiaries, in studying the subsidiaries of the multinationals you arrive at the fact that everything is controlled by the Crown, all lead back to operatives of the Roman Illuminati Church via the KnightsTemplarChurch.

A fact worth noting is that just because a company like Pilkington Glass is now perceived to be owned by a none British company, it has only moved from the British economy, not from the control nor economy of the Illuminati who own everything, this type of movement is only a movement within the global conglomerate that is the New World Order and still earning for, and controlled by, the bloodline elite, albeit via a different branch of the elite tree.

Just look at some of the TV companies owned and thus controlled by General Electric:

NBC network
CNBC
MSNBC
Bravo
MUN2 TV
Sci-Fi channel
Trio
WNBC - New York
KNBC - Los Angeles
WMAQ - Chicago
WCAU - Philadelphia
KNTV - San Jose - San Francisco
KXAS - Dallas - Fort Worth
WRAC Washington
WTVJ - Miami
KNSDF - San Diego
WVIT - Hartford
WNCN - Raleigh
WCMH - Columbus
WVTM - Birmingham (USA)
WJAR - Providence
KVEA / KWHY - Los Angeles
WNJU - New York
WSCV - Miami
KTMD - Houston
WSNS - Chicago
KXTX - Dallas
KVDA - San Antonio
KSTS - San Francisco
KDRX - Phoenix
KNSO - Fresno
KMAS - Denver
WNEU - Boston / Merrimack
KHRR - Tucson
WKAQ - Puerto Rico
Universal Studios
NBC Universal Television Studio
NBC Universal Television Distribution.

This is one company controlling a major chunk of the TV dream state given out to the whole of America. Is it any wonder American's are completely under the control of the American elite?
Another important part of the Windsor network which is part of the CrownTemple are, the City Livery Companies. These purport to represent the various groups of merchants like the gun makers, stationers, newspaper makers, goldsmiths and the like. They are in fact very secret societies fundamental to the control of the City institutions and much further afield. In the 1350's, in the wake of the plague known to history as the black death, government of the City was passed from the ward councils to the City Livery Companies. In 1979 the year Thatcher took power, the Honourable Company of Freemen of the City of London and of North America, began to hold meetings in New York and Toronto and on October 21st 1991 the Association of Liverymen of the City of London in Hong Kong was founded and all their members were Architects (Freemasons). The late author Peter Jones, researched some of the Livery Companies in the 1990's for his book,' the obedience of Australia', which exposed the manipulation which led to the removal by the Queen, of Australian Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam. These are some of the names he found within these companies:

Engineers: The Duke of Edinburgh.
Airline Pilots and Navigators: The Duke of Edinburgh Prince Andrew
Butchers: Queen Mother, Lord Vesty (of the meat family and Lord Prior of the Order of St John of Jerusalem)
Merchant Tailors: Queen Mother, Lord Whitelaw, Lord
Glovers: Margaret Thatcher, Sir John Fieldhouse (Admiral of the Fleet during the Falklands conflict)
Poulterers: Margaret Thatcher, Duchess of Devonshire.
Fishmongers: Duke and Duchess of Devonshire, C.E.A
Hambro (Hambros Bank, Taylor Woodrow, and P&O), Lord Inchcape (Her Majesty's Lieutenant of London)
Goldsmiths: J.H Hambro.
Grocers: Edward Heath.
Salter's: Duke of Kent (Grand Master of English Freemasonry) Lord Armstrong.
Clothworkers: Sir Peter Gadson (a Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge), Lord Carrington (Thatcher's handler).

Another name prominent within these companies is McAlpine of the construction family.
You will of course have noted Prince Philip heading the Pilots and Navigators which gives indication as to who is in control of the current attack on our right to travel by plane and the whole swath of legislation about to come out relative to the air traffic using the environment scam to force it through. Just as a matter of interest, the cheap flight operator Easy Jet is financed by the Warberg Bank which is part of the Rothschilds empire and proven beyond doubt to have funded the rise of Hitler's war machine on behalf of the Rothschilds.
The fact they are now blaming these cheap flight operators for the rise in carbon emissions shows you why the Warberg bank has funded this airline, it is the catalyst for the introduction of the carbon scam. Basically they will determine how much you as a household can travel. You have to look at this whole carbon emission agenda as an attempt to instil a massive suppressing layer of control upon families and business via the introduction of quotas per household.

This will stifle people movement to unimaginable levels. Don't forget the House of Rothschild operates directly under the current British chief, Prince Philip. Prince Philip's whole family were supporters of the Nazi's as was he. In 1935 Prince Christoph, the husband of Philip's sister Sophie, was a colonel in the SS of Himmler's personal staff and head of the Forschungsamt, an elite intelligence operation controlled by Hermann Goering.
It was they who carried out the famous Night of the Long Knives when Hitler removed his key opponents. Christoph and Sophie named their eldest child, Karl Adolf, after Hitler, Prince Philip was involved in his education. Christoph's brother, Philip of Hess, was related to the King of Italy and was the official liaison between the fascists of Italy and Germany. Also at the same time the British King, Edward VIII, who was forced to abdicate in order the Queen Mother could be placed in the position of Chief Toad (remember Diana used to call the Windsor's 'toadies') which meant she had to marry the lesser of the brothers, Bertie, the one she could obviously control.

Edward was well known to be a Nazi supporter; Prince Philip kept up very serious connections with Edward even after his abdication in 1936. Another of Edward's supporters, and mentor to Prince Philip was the known paedophile and Satanist Lord Louis Mountbatten (Battenberg). Mountbatten was Philips route into the House of Windsor. Mountbatten was the grandson of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert and was born at WindsorCastle in 1900. while Mountbatten was supposedly fighting on the British side during the war he maintained serious communications with his and the Windsor's German Clan via his sister Louise, the Crown Princess of Sweden and wife of King Gustav. Louise was Prince Philips aunt. At the end of the war, in June 1945 the British King, George VI, the father of Queen Elizabeth and Puppet of the Queen Mother, sent the former MI5 officer, Anthony Blunt, to the Kronberg Castle of Prince Philips sister Sophie, and her Nazi husband Prince Christoph of Hess, to recover correspondence between the British Royal Family and their Nazi relatives, for propaganda aimed at convincing the aristocrats of Britain they had not been in contact all along. Blunt was the 'surveyor of the Queens Pictures' and a world expert in the paintings of Poussin, the initiate who painted pictures called 'The Shepherds of Arcadia' which related to the Rennes-le-Chateau mysteries. If you remember Blunt was named as a member of a KGB unit inside British intelligence along with Burgess, MacLean, and Philby, the fifth man of course was never named, but was in fact Lord Victor Rothschild.

If you have seen the latest Bond movies, you hear the Character 'M' played by Dame Judy Dench state, ' in the cold war days intelligence operatives that made a big mistake had the common decency to defect', of course they would the intelligence services of the world are one and the same. When Blunt was finally caught in the 1980's, Queen Elizabeth II demanded he was not questioned on his clandestine mission to KronbergCastle… So who controls the law?
Another important secret society within the CrownTemple is the Knights Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath, sounds pretty strange until you understand its symbolism. Both 'poppy' George Bush and Ronald Reagan were given this title. The resurrection bath of alchemy symbolises rebirth and purification or absolution. Baths are given to Masonic Knights of the Bath before they perform horrendous deeds, hence the term 'Blood Baths.

This information in the last few paragraphs still only hints at the true power of the Crown Temple, one also has to include all that the Vatican openly controls to see the true extent of the power of the Roman Illuminati Church to which the Knights Templar Church is subordinate. Through all these networks and more, Thirteen Royal Nefilim families control the world, and it is they who are carrying out all the atrocities in the world at this present time using sad and pathetic creatures, namely fanatics of the human race to carry out the agenda of the Elohim.

The Crown also owns massive parts of our coastline around this nation and 12 miles out to sea, in total about half of the coastline. Some of this is under the control of the Ministry of Defence itself controlled by the Crown. The current legislation in which the National Trust will purchase some of this land from the MOD and coast not belonging to the MOD changes nothing. The National Trust is 100% controlled by the Crown. We have the British Waterways agency, and the railways again controlling massive amounts of land, we are almost back to the middle ages now.

One of the greatest means to the Windsor landgrab is the:

CLUB OF THE ISLES

Controlling the World Wildlife Fund, WWF, this is one hell of a heinous operation and given the fact Prince Philip inherited the position as the Queens fella, as commander of the Club of the Isles...Then he is at the helm of genocide the likes the Holocaust could never imagine.
I see the Royals are playing the good guys relative to the Sunni Muslims with the release of the Manchester man after 18 years in prison in Pakistan, this in itself shows you who operates President Musharaff of Pakistan, via such orders as the Order of the Mystic Shrine, 'Shriners'.
This is important given Pakistan is now under attack from the NATO forces, again controlled by the Inner City banking cartel which includes the Dutch and the Swiss.

So how does the Crown control all the MP's? Answer; via the whip system. All MP's that you vote in to represent you are told how to vote each day by each party's leadership via the whips. So when any politician that has ever been and will be while this system exists, tells lies to the whole population the minute he or she opens its mouth and speaks. No matter what it speaks about it is speaking what it has been told to speak, how to speak and when to speak. If it does not obey the whips there career is over. Thus the Crown need only control the personnel at leadership level or the cabinet of each political party and the Whips office, then through that clique of puppets demand obedience from all MP's down to the nutters sat in each constituency claiming to be acting on your behalf. How you have all missed this one is beyond me.

So the majority of Mundane Persons, oops sorry MP's don't even get to see each bill before it goes to the vote, and indeed they don't need to as they are told how to vote.

On Sunday 11th February 2007 on the political show 'Sunday AM, Giles Brandreth a conservative party whip stated:

"As a whip we understand each MP's marital problems, their drinking problems their financial problems, we know a lot about them. We then advise and guide them to making the right decisions."

Do you still feel MP's operate by their own mind and emotions? Of course they do not. This is the best I have witnessed from a politician handing you on a plate how the game of politics in truth operates. They are all via fear of their personal information being leaked; totally afraid of the whips, and so do the whips bidding, which of course is the Crown's bidding. All MP's that speak at the box in the commons do so under oath to the Bible positioned under the box, what does that tell you about those who operate as very religious people (Blair) when they spew the bullshit? Blair is a high member of the Illuminati that is why he can lie as he speaks to the house and the people, with ease.

As already stated most personnel within Freemasonry go no further than Master Mason. The Master Mason degree links with the Hyksos deities through Sekhmet who is a lioness Goddess of demolition or destruction, also the same deity known to the Hindu as Kali, the Irish Morrigan, and the Scottish Cailleach. Sekhmet beloved of Ptah the Master Mason is her consort or puppet. Thus the master mason rebuilds the destruction of Sekhmet; this marriage creates a third force or son that of Nefer-Tem better known as Imhotep. Thus we have the symbolism of the chaos / order principle.

The CrownTemple
By Rule of Mystery Babylon
The Templars of the Crown

Just to recap and then deepen the study of that which controls all:

The governmental and judicial systems within the United States of America, at both federal and local state levels, is owned by the "Crown," which is a private foreign power. Before jumping to conclusions about the Queen of England or the Royal Families of Britain owning the U.S.A., this is a different "Crown" and is fully exposed and explained below. We are specifically referencing the established Templar Church, known for centuries by the world as the "Crown." From this point on, we will also refer to the Crown as the Crown Temple or Crown Templar, all three being synonymous.

First, a little historical background. The Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar in two parts: the Round and the Chancel. The RoundChurch was consecrated in 1185 and modelled after the circular Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. The Chancel was built in 1240. The TempleChurch serves both the Inner and MiddleTemples (see below) and is located between Fleet Street and Victoria Embankment at the Thames River. Its grounds also house the Crown Offices at Crown Office Row. This Temple "Church" is outside any canonical jurisdiction. The Master of the Temple is appointed and takes his place by sealed (non-public) patent, without induction or institution.

All licensed Bar Attorneys - Attorners (see definitions below) - in the U.S. owe their allegiance and give their solemn oath in pledge to the Crown Temple, realising this or not. This is simply due to the fact that all Bar Associations throughout the world are signatories and franchises to the international Bar Association located at the Inns of Court at CrownTemple, which are physically located at Chancery Lane behind Fleet Street in London.

Although they vehemently deny it, all Bar Associations in the U.S., such as the American Bar Association, the Florida Bar, or California Bar Association, are franchises to the Crown.

The Inns of Court (see below, The Four Inns of Court) to the Crown Temple use the Banking and Judicial system of the City of London - a sovereign and independent territory which is not a part of Great Britain (just as Washington City, as DC was called in the 1800s, is not a part of the north American states, nor is it a state) to defraud, coerce, and manipulate the American people. These Fleet Street bankers and lawyers are committing crimes in America under the guise and colour of law (see definitions for legal and lawful below). They are known collectively as the "Crown." Their lawyers are actually Templar Bar Attornies, not lawyers.
The present Queen of England is not the "Crown," as we have all been led to believe. Rather, it is the Bankers and Attornies (Attorneys) who are the actual Crown or Crown Temple. The Monarch aristocrats of England have not been ruling sovereigns since the reign of King John, circa 1215. All royal sovereignty of the old British Crown since that time has passed to the Crown Temple in Chancery.

The U.S.A. is not the free and sovereign nation that our federal government tells us it is. If this were true, we would not be dictated to by the Crown Temple through its bankers and attornies. The U.S.A. is controlled and manipulated by this private foreign power and our unlawful Federal U.S. Government is their pawnbroker. The bankers and Bar Attorneys in the U.S.A. are a franchise in oath and allegiance to the Crown at Chancery - the Crown Temple Church and its Chancel located at Chancery Lane - a manipulative body of elite bankers and attorners from the independent City of London who violate the law in America by imposing fraudulent "legal" - but totally unlawful - contracts on the American people. The banks Rule the Temple Church and the Attorners carry out their Orders by controlling their victim's judiciary.

Since the first Chancel of the Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar, this is not a new ruling system by any means. The Chancel, or Chancery, of the Crown Inner Temple Court was where King John was, in January 1215, when the English barons demanded that he confirm the rights enshrined in the Magna Carta. This City of London Temple was the headquarters of the Templar Knights in Great Britain where Order and Rule were first made, which became known as Code. Remember all these terms, such as Crown, Temple, Templar, Knight, Chancel, Chancery, Court, Code, Order and Rule as we tie together their origins with the present American Temple Bar system of thievery by equity (chancery) contracts.

"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness." - Matthew 23:27

By what authority has the "Crown" usurped the natural sovereignty of the American people? Is it acceptable that the U.S. Supreme Court decides constitutional issues in the U.S.A? How can it be considered in any manner as being "constitutional" when this same Supreme Court is appointed by (not elected) and paid by the Federal U.S. Government? As you will soon see, the land called North America belongs to the Crown Temple.

The legal system (judiciary) of the U.S.A. is controlled by the CrownTemple from the independent and sovereign City of London. The private Federal Reserve System, which issues fiat U.S. Federal Reserve Notes, is financially owned and controlled by the Crown from Switzerland, the home and legal origin for the charters of the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization, and most importantly, the Bank of International Settlements. Even Hitler respected his Crown bankers by not bombing Switzerland. The Bank of International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland [Vatican bank] controls all the central banks of the G7 nations. He who controls the gold rules the world.

Definitions you never knew:

ATTORN [e-'tern] Anglo-French aturner to transfer (allegiance of a tenant to another lord), from Old French atorner to turn (to), arrange, from a- to + torner to turn: to agree to be the tenant of a new landlord or owner of the same property. Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law ©1996.

ATTORN, v.i. [L. ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lord to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassals or tenants, upon the alienation of the estate.-Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

ESQUIRE, n [L. scutum, a shield; Gr. a hide, of which shields were anciently made.], a shield-bearer or armor-bearer, scutifer; an attendant on a knight. Hence in modern times, a title of dignity next in degree below a knight. In England, this title is given to the younger sons of noblemen, to officers of the king's courts and of the household, to counselors at law, justices of the peace, while in commission, sheriffs, and other gentlemen. In the United States, the title is given to public officers of all degrees, from governors down to justices and attorneys.-Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

RULE, n. [L. regula, from regere, to govern, that is, to stretch, strain or make straight.] 1. Government; sway; empire; control; supreme command or authority. 6. In monasteries, corporations or societies, a law or regulation to be observed by the society and its particular members. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary

RULE n. 1 [C] a statement about what must or should be done, (syn.) a regulation.

REGULATION n. 1 [C] a rule, statement about what can be done and what cannot. 2 [U] the general condition of controlling any part of human life. -Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.

CODE n. 1 [C;U] a way of hiding the true meaning of communications from all except those people who have the keys to understand it. 2 [C] a written set of rules of behavior. 3 [C] a formal group of principles or laws. -v. coded, coding, codes to put into code, (syn.) to encode. ENCODE v. 1 to change written material into secret symbols. -Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.

CURTAIN n. [OE. cortin, curtin, fr. OF. cortine, curtine, F. courtine, LL. cortina, also, small court, small inclosure surrounded by walls, from cortis court. See Court .] 4 A flag; an ensign; -- in contempt. [Obs.] Shak. Behind the curtain, in concealment; in secret. -1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary.

COURT, n. 3. A palace; the place of residence of a king or sovereign prince. 5. Persons who compose the retinue or council of a king or emperor. 9. The tabernacle had one court; the temple, three. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

COURT n. 2 the place where a king or queen lives or meets others. -The Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.

TEMPLAR, n. [from the Temple, a house near the Thames, which originally belonged to the knights Templars. The latter took their denomination from an apartment of the palace of Baldwin II in Jerusalem, near the temple.] 1. A student of the law. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

TEMPLE, n. [L. templum.] 1. A public edifice erected in honour of some deity. Among pagans, a building erected to some pretended deity, and in which the people assembled to worship. Originally, temples were open places, as the Stonehenge in England. 4. In England, the Temples are two inns of court, thus called because anciently the dwellings of the knights Templars. They are called the Inner and the Middle Temple. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

CAPITOL, n. 1. The temple of Jupiter in Rome, and a fort or castle, on the Mons Capitolinus. In this, the Senate of Rome anciently assembled; and on the same place, is still the city hall or town-house, where the conservators of the Romans hold their meetings. The same name was given to the principal temples of the Romans in their colonies.

[This shows without doubt, that the claim by the American historians of a Greek model for their democracy actually has no relation to the Greek democracy but to Rome's system, seen in Capitol hill and in the term Senate. America was never set up as a democracy…it was a republic].

INN, n. [Hebrew, To dwell or to pitch a tent.] 2. In England, a college of municipal or common law professors and students; formerly, the town-house of a nobleman, bishop or other distinguished personage, in which he resided when he attended the court. Inns of Court, colleges in which students of law reside and are instructed. The principal are the InnerTemple, the MiddleTemple, Lincoln's Inn, and Gray's Inn. Inns of chancery, colleges in which young students formerly began their law studies. These are now occupied chiefly by attorneys, solicitors, etc. [One can include the term 'Inn' as it is used in the tale of Jesus' birth, to mean nothing of the sort?]

INNER, a. [from in.] Interior; farther inward than something else, as an inner chamber; the inner court of a temple or palace. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

CROWN, n. 4. Imperial or regal power or dominion; sovereignty. There is a power behind the crown greater than the crown itself. Junius. 19. A coin stamped with the image of a crown; hence, a denomination of money; as, the English crown. -- Crown land, land belonging to the crown, that is, to the sovereign. -- Crown law, [British Admiralty Law] the law which governs criminal prosecutions. -- Crown lawyer, one employed by the crown, as in criminal cases. v.t. 1. To cover, decorate, or invest with a crown; hence, to invest with royal dignity and power. -1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary.

COLONY, n. 1. A company [i.e. legal corporation] or body of people transplanted from their mother country to a remote province or country to cultivate and inhabit it, and remaining subject to the jurisdiction of the parent state; as the British colonies in America or the Indies; the Spanish colonies in South America. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

STATE, n. [L., to stand, to be fixed.] 1. Condition; the circumstances of a being or thing at any given time. These circumstances may be internal, constitutional or peculiar to the being, or they may have relation to other beings. 4. Estate; possession. [See Estate.] -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

ESTATE, n. [L. status, from sto, to stand. The roots stb, std and stg, have nearly the same signification, to set, to fix. It is probable that the L. sto is contracted from stad, as it forms steti.] 1. In a general sense, fixedness; a fixed condition; 5. Fortune; possessions; property in general. 6. The general business or interest of government; hence, a political body; a commonwealth; a republic. But in this sense, we now use State.

ESTATE, v.t. To settle as a fortune. 1. To establish. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

PATENT, a. [L. patens, from pateo, to open.] 3. Appropriated by letters patent. 4. Apparent; conspicuous.

PATENT, n. A writing given by the proper authority and duly authenticated, granting a privilege to some person or persons. By patent, or letters patent, that is, open letters, the king of Great Britain grants lands, honours and franchises.

PATENT, v.t. To grant by patent. 1. To secure the exclusive right of a thing to a person.

LAWFUL. In accordance with the law of the land; according to the law; permitted, sanctioned, or justified by law. "Lawful" properly implies a thing conformable to or enjoined by law; "Legal", a thing in the form or after the manner of law or binding by law. A writ or warrant issuing from any court, under colour of law, is a "legal" process however defective. - A Dictionary of Law 1893.

LEGAL. Latin legalis. Pertaining to the understanding, the exposition, the administration, the science and the practice of law: as, the legal profession, legal advice; legal blanks, newspaper. Implied or imputed in law. Opposed to actual. "Legal" looks more to the letter, and "Lawful" to the spirit, of the law. "Legal" is more appropriate for conformity to positive rules of law; "Lawful" for accord with ethical principle. "Legal" imports rather that the forms of law are observed, that the proceeding is correct in method, that rules prescribed have been obeyed; "Lawful" that the right is actful in substance, that moral quality is secured. "Legal" is the antithesis of "equitable", and the equivalent of "constructive". - 2 Abbott's Law Dict. 24; A Dictionary of Law (1893).

STATUS IN QUO, STATUS QUO. [L., state in which.] The state in which anything is already. The phrase is also used retrospectively, as when, on a treaty of place, matters return to the status quo ante bellum, or are left in statu quo ante bellum, i.e., the state (or, in the state) before the war. -1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary

The Four Inns of Court to the unholy Temple

Globally, all the legalistic scams promoted by the exclusive monopoly of the Temple Bar and their Bar Association franchises come from four Inns or Temples of Court:

THE INNER TEMPLE, THE MIDDLE TEMPLE, LINCOLN'S INN, GREYS INN.

These Inns/Temples are exclusive and private country clubs; secret societies of world power in commerce. They are well established, some having been founded in the early 1200's. The Queen mother was, and the Queen of England is, a current member of both the InnerTemple and Middle Temple. Gray's Inn specialises in Taxation legalities by Rule and Code for the Crown. Lincoln's Inn received its name from the Third Earl of Lincoln (circa 1300).

Just like all U.S. based franchise Bar Associations, none of the Four Inns of the Temple are incorporated - for a definite and purposeful reason: You can't make claim against a non-entity and a non-being. They are private societies without charters or statutes, and their so-called constitutions are based solely on custom and self-regulation. In other words, they exist as secret societies without a public "front door" unless you're a private member called to their Bar.

While the InnerTemple holds the legal system franchise by license to steal from Canada and Great Britain, it is the MiddleTemple that has legal license to steal from America.

This comes about directly via their Bar Association franchises to the Honourable Society of the MiddleTemple through the Crown Temple.

From The History Of The Inn, Later Centuries, [p.6], written by the Honourable Society of the MiddleTemple, we can see a direct tie to the Bar Association franchises and its Crown signatories in America:
"Call to the Bar or keeping terms in one of the four Inns a pre-requisite to Call at King's Inns until late in the 19th century. In the 17th and 18th centuries, students came from the American colonies and from many of the West Indian islands. The Inn's records would lead one to suppose that for a time there was hardly a young gentleman in Charleston who had not studied here. Five of the signatories to the Declaration of Independence were Middle Templars, and notwithstanding it and its consequences, Americans continued to come here until the War of 1812".

All Bar Association licensed Attorneys must keep the terms of their oath to the Crown Temple in order to be accepted or "called to Bar" at any of the King's Inns. Their oath, pledge, and terms of allegiance are made to the Crown Temple.

It's a real eye opener to know that the Middle Inn of the Crown Temple has publicly acknowledged there were at least five Templar Bar Attornies, under solemn oath only to the Crown, who signed what was alleged to be an American Declaration of Independence. This simply means that both parties to the Declaration agreement were of the same origin, the Crown Temple. In case you don't understand the importance of this, there is no international agreement or treaty that will ever be honoured, or will ever have lawful effect, when the same party signs as both the first and second parties. It's merely a worthless piece of paper with no lawful authority when both sides to any agreement are actually the same. In reality, the American Declaration of Independence was nothing more than an internal memo of the Crown Temple made among its private members.

By example, Alexander Hamilton was one of those numerous Crown Templars who was called to their Bar. In 1774, he entered King's College in New York City, which was funded by members of the London King's Inns, now named Columbia University. In 1777, he became a personal aide and private secretary to George Washington during the American Revolution.

In May of 1782, Hamilton began studying law in Albany, New York, and within six months had completed a three year course of studies, passed his examinations, and was admitted to the New York Bar. Of course, the New York Bar Association was/is a franchise of the Crown Temple through the Middle Inn. After a year's service in Congress during the 1782-1783 session, he settled down to legal practice in New York City as Alexander Hamilton, Esqr. In February of 1784, he wrote the charter for, and became a founding member of, the Bank of New York, the State's first bank.

He secured a place on the New York delegation to the Federal Convention of 1787 at Philadelphia. In a five hour speech on June 18th, he stated "an Executive for life will be an elective Monarch". When all his anti-Federalist New York colleagues withdrew from the Convention in protest, he alone signed the Constitution for the United States of America representing New York State, one of the legal Crown States (Colonies).

One should particularly notice that a lawful state is made up of the people, but a State is a legal entity of the Crown - a Crown Colony. This is an example of the deceptive ways the CrownTemple - Middle Templars - have taken control of America since the beginning of the settlements.

Later, as President Washington's U.S. Treasury Secretary, Hamilton alone laid the foundation of the first Federal U.S. Central Bank, secured credit loans through Crown banks in France and the Netherlands, and increased the power of the Federal Government over the hoodwinked nation-states of the Union. Hamilton had never made a secret of the fact that he admired the government and fiscal policies of Great Britain.
Americans were fooled into believing that the legal Crown Colonies comprising New England were independent nation states, but they never were nor are today. They were and still are Colonies of the CrownTemple, through letters patent and charters, who have no legal authority to be independent from the Rule and Order of the Crown Temple. A legal State is a Crown Temple Colony.

Neither the American people nor the Queen of Britain own America. The CrownTemple owns America through the deception of those who have sworn their allegiance by oath to the Middle Templar Bar. The Crown Bankers and their Middle Templar Attornies Rule America through unlawful contracts, unlawful taxes, and contract documents of false equity through debt deceit, all strictly enforced by their completely unlawful, but "legal", Orders, Rules and Codes of the Crown Temple Courts, our so-called "judiciary" in America. This is because the CrownTemple holds the land titles and estate deeds to all of North America.
The biggest lie is what the Crown and its agents refer to as "the rule of law". In reality, it is not about law at all, but solely about the Crown Rule of all nations. For example, just read what President Bush stated on November 13, 2001, regarding the "rule of law:"

"Our countries are embarked on a new relationship for the 21st century, founded on a commitment to the values of democracy, the free market, and the rule of law." - Joint Statement by President George W. Bush and President Vladimir V. Putin on 11/13/01, spoken from the White House, WashingtonD.C.

What happened in 1776?

"Whoever owns the soil, owns all the way to the heavens and to the depths of the earth." - Old Latin maxim and Roman expression.

1776 is the year that will truly live in infamy for all Americans. It is the year that the Crown Colonies became legal Crown States. The Declaration of Independence was a legal, not lawful, document. It was signed on both sides by representatives of the Crown Temple. Legally, it announced the status quo of the Crown Colonies to that of the new legal name called "States" as direct possessive estates of the Crown (see the definitions above to understand the legal trickery that was done).

The American people were hoodwinked into thinking they were declaring lawful independence from the Crown. Proof that the Colonies are still in Crown possession is the use of the word "State" to signify a "legal estate of possession." Had this been a document of and by the people, both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution would have been written using the word "states". By the use of "State," the significance of a government of estate possession was legally established. All of the North American States are Crown Templar possessions through their legal document, signed by their representation of both parties to the contract, known as the Constitution of the United States of America.

All "Constitutional Rights" in America are simply those dictated by the Crown Temple and enforced by the Middle Inn Templars (Bar Attorners) through their franchise and corporate government entity, the federal United States Government. When a "State Citizen" attempts to invoke his "constitutional", natural, or common law "rights" in Chancery (equity courts), he is told they don't apply. Why? Simply because a State citizen has no rights outside of the Rule and Codes of Crown "law". Only a state citizen has natural and common law rights by the paramount authority of God's Law.

The people who comprise the citizenry of a state are recognised only within natural and common law as is already established by God's Law. Only a State Citizen can be a party to an action within a State Court. A common state citizen cannot be recognised in that court because he doesn't legally exist in Crown Chancery Courts. In order to be recognised in their State Courts, the common man must be converted to that of a corporate or legal entity (a legal fiction).

Now you know why they create such an entity using all capital letters within Birth Certificates issued by the State. They convert the common lawful man of God into a fictional legal entity subject to Administration by State Rules, Orders and Codes (there is no "law" within any Rule or Code). Of course, Rules, Codes, etc. do not apply to the lawful common man of the Lord of lords, so the man with inherent Godly law and rights must be converted into a legal "Person" of fictional "status" (another legal term) in order for their legal - but completely unlawful - State Judiciary (Chancery Courts) to have authority over him. Chancery Courts are tribunal courts where the decisions of "justice" are decided by 3 "judges". This is a direct result of the Crown Temple having invoked their Rule and Code over all judicial courts.

"It is held to be a settled Rule, that our courts can not take notice of any title to land not derived from the State or Colonial government, and duly verified by patent." -4 Johns. Rep. 163. Jackson v. Waters, 12 Johns. Rep. 365. S.P.

The CrownTemple was granted Letters Patent (see definition above) and Charters (definition below) for all the land (Colonies) of New England by the King of England, a sworn member of the Middle Temple (as the Queen is now). Since the people were giving the patent/charter corporations and Colonial Governors such a hard time, especially concerning Crown taxation, a scheme was devised to allow the Americans to believe they were being granted "independence." Remember, the Crown Templars represented both parties to the 1776 Declaration of Independence; and, as we are about to see, the latter 1787 U.S. Constitution.
To have this "Declaration" recognised by international treaty law, and in order to establish the new legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States, Middle Templar King George III agreed to the Treaty of Paris on September 3, 1783, "between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United States". The Crown of Great Britain legally was, then and now, the Crown Temple. This formally gave international recognition to the corporate "United States", the new Crown Temple States (Colonies). Most important is to know who the actual signatories to the Treaty of Paris were. Take particular note to the abbreviation "Esqr." following their names (see above definition for ESQUIRE) as this legally signifies "Officers of the King's Courts", which we now know were Templar Courts or Crown Courts. This is the same Crown Templar Title given to Alexander Hamilton (see above).

The Crown was represented in signature by "David Hartley, Esqr.", a Middle Templar of the King's Court. Representing the United States (a Crown franchise) by signature was "John Adams, Esqr", "Benjamin Franklin, Esqr." and "John Jay, Esqr." The signatories for the "United States" were also Middle Templars of the King's Court through Bar Association membership. What is plainly written in history proves, once again, that the Crown Temple was representing both parties to the agreement. What a perfect and elaborate scam the people of North America had pulled on them! [For synchronicity, as I prepare this info for the site, on the TV is the Film; 'John Adams'…]

It becomes even more obvious when you read Article 5, which states in part:

"to provide for the Restitution of all Estates, Rights, and Properties which have been confiscated, belonging to real British Subjects."

The Crown Colonies were granted to "persons" and corporations of the Crown Temple through Letters Patent and Charters, and the North American Colonial land was owned by the Crown.

Now, here's a real catch-all in Article 4:

"It is agreed that creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value in sterling money of all bona fide debts heretofore contracted."

Since the Crown and its Templars represented both the United States, as the debtors, and the Crown, as the creditors, then they became the creditor of the American people by owning all debts of the former Colonies, now called the legal Crown States. This sounds too good to be true, but these are the facts. The words 'SCAM' and 'HOODWINKED' cannot begin to describe what had taken place.

So then, what debts were owed to the Crown Temple and their banks as of 1883?

In the CONTRACT BETWEEN THE KING AND THE THIRTEEN UNITED STATES OF NORTH AMERICA, signed at Versailles July 16, 1782, Article I states:

"It is agreed and certified that the sums advanced by His Majesty to the Congress of the United States under the title of a loan, in the years 1778, 1779, 1780, 1781, and the present 1782, amount to the sum of eighteen million of livres, money of France, according to the following twenty-one receipts of the above-mentioned underwritten Minister of Congress, given in virtue of his full powers, to wit ... "

That amount equals about $18 million dollars, plus interest, that Hamilton's U.S. Central Bank owed the Crown through Crown Bank loans in France. This was signed, on behalf of the United States, by an already familiar Middle Templar, Benjamin Franklin, Esquire.

An additional $6 million dollars (six million livres) was loaned to the United States at 5% interest by the same parties in a similar Contract signed on February 25, 1783. The Crown Bankers in the Netherlands and France were calling in their debts for payment by future generations of Americans.

The Fiscal Agents of Mystery Babylon

Since its beginnings, the TempleChurch at the City of London has been a Knight Templar secret society. It was built and established by the same Temple Knights who were given their Rule and Order by the Roman Pope. It's very important to know how the British Royal Crown was placed into the hands of the Knights Templars, and how the Crown Templars became the fiscal and military agents for the Pope of the Roman Church, or the correct present day title for the British Crown; Chief Executives Office.

This all becomes very clear through the Concession Of England To The Pope on May 15, 1213.charter was sworn in fealty by England's King John to Pope Innocent and the Roman Church. It was witnessed before the Crown Templars, as King John stated upon sealing the same:

"I myself bearing witness in the house of the Knights Templars."

Pay particular attention to the words being used that we have defined below, especially charter, fealty, demur, and concession:

We wish it to be known to all of you, through this our charter, furnished with our seal ... not induced by force or compelled by fear, but of our own good and spontaneous will and by the common counsel of our barons, do offer and freely concede to God and His holy apostles Peter and Paul and to our mother the holy Roman church, and to our lord pope Innocent and to his Catholic successors, the whole kingdom of England and the whole kingdom Ireland, with all their rights and appurtenances ... we perform and swear fealty for them to him our aforesaid lord pope Innocent, and his catholic successors and the Roman church ...
binding our successors and our heirs by our wife forever, in similar manner to perform fealty and show homage to him who shall be chief pontiff at that time, and to the Roman church without demur. As a sign ... we will and establish perpetual obligation and concession ... from the proper and especial revenues of our aforesaid kingdoms ... the Roman church shall receive yearly a thousand marks sterling ...
saving to us and to our heirs our rights, liberties and regalia; all of which things, as they have been described above, we wish to have perpetually valid and firm; and we bind ourselves and our successors not to act counter to them. And if we or any one of our successors shall presume to attempt this, whoever he be, unless being duly warned he come to his kingdom, and this senses, be shall lose his right to the kingdom, and this charter of our obligation and concession shall always remain firm.

Most who have commented on this charter only emphasise the payments due the Pope and the Roman Church. What should be emphasised is the fact that King John broke the terms of this charter by signing the Magna Carta on June 15, 1215. Remember; the penalty for breaking the 1213 agreement was the loss of the Crown (right to the kingdom) to the Pope and his Roman Church. It says so quite plainly. To formally and lawfully take the Crown from the royal monarchs of England by an act of declaration, on August 24, 1215, Pope Innocent III annulled the Magna Carta; later in the year, he placed an Interdict (prohibition) on the entire British Empire.

From that time until today, the English monarchy and the entire British Crown belonged to the Pope. But of course way above the Pope, stand the Imperial bloodlines that have cleverly portrayed the idea they have no power. The Pope and Church are mere systems to cloak and frustrate any attempts at connecting the whole show together, what in history seems to be opposing forces are in fact just another dividing of the people, created by the ultimate benefactors of this Babylonian empire; the Roman Imperial bloodlines, or better known today as the Black Guelphs. That covers all the European monarchs today.

The following definitions are all taken from Webster's 1828 Dictionary since the meanings have not been perverted for nearly 200 years:

FEALTY, n. [L. fidelis.] Fidelity to a lord; faithful adherence of a tenant or vassal to the superior of whom he holds his lands; loyalty. Under the feudal system of tenures, every vassal or tenant was bound to be true and faithful to his lord, and to defend him against all his enemies. This obligation was called his fidelity or fealty, and an oath of fealty was required to be taken by all tenants to their landlords. The tenant was called a liege man; the land, a liege fee; and the superior, liege lord.

FEE, n. [In English, is loan. This word, fee, inland, or an estate in trust, originated among the descendants of the northern conquerors of Italy, but it originated in the south of Europe. See Feud.] Primarily, a loan of land, an estate in trust, granted by a prince or lord, to be held by the grantee on condition of personal service, or other condition; and if the grantee or tenant failed to perform the conditions, the land reverted to the lord or donor, called the landlord, or lend-lord, the lord of the loan. A fee then is any land or tenement held of a superior on certain conditions. It is synonymous with fief and feud. In the United States, an estate in fee or fee simple is what is called in English law an allodial estate, an estate held by a person in his own right, and descendible to the heirs in general.

FEUD, n. [L. fides; Eng. loan.] A fief; a fee; a right to lands or hereditaments held in trust, or on the terms of performing certain conditions; the right which a vassal or tenant has to the lands or other immovable thing of his lord, to use the same and take the profits thereof hereditarily, rendering to his superior such duties and services as belong to military tenure, &c., the property of the soil always remaining in the lord or superior.
By swearing to the 1213 Charter in fealty, King John declared that the British-English Crown and its possessions at that time, including all future possessions, estates, trusts, charters, letters patent, and land, were forever bound to the Pope and the Roman Church, the landlord. Some five hundred years later, the New England Colonies in America became a part of the Crown as a possession and trust named the "United States."

ATTORNING, ppr. Acknowledging a new lord, or transferring homage and fealty to the purchaser of an estate.

Bar Attorneys have been attorning ever since they were founded at the Temple Church, by acknowledging that the Crown and he who holds the Crown is the new lord of the land.

CHARTER, n. 1. A written instrument, executed with usual forms, given as evidence of a grant, contract, or whatever is done between man and man. In its more usual sense, it is the instrument of a grant conferring powers, rights and privileges, either from a king or other sovereign power, or from a private person, as a charter of exemption, that no person shall be empanelled on a jury, a charter of pardon, &c. The charters under which most of the colonies in America were settled, were given by the king of England, and incorporated certain persons, with powers to hold the lands granted, to establish a government, and make laws for their own regulation. These were called charter-governments.

By agreeing to the Magna Carta, King John had broken the agreement terms of his fealty with Rome and the Pope.

The Pope and his Roman Church control the Crown Temple because his Knights established it under his Orders. He who controls the gold controls the world.

The Crown Temple Today

The workings of the Crown Temple in this day and age is more so obvious, yet somewhat hidden. The Crown Templars have many names and many symbols to signify their private and unholy Temple. Take a close look at the (alleged) one dollar $1 private Federal Reserve System (a Crown banking franchise) Debt Note.
Notice in the base of the pyramid the Roman date MDCCLXXVI which is written in Roman numerals for the year 1776. The words ANNUIT COEPTIS NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM are Roman Latin for ANNOUNCING THE BIRTH OF THE NEW ORDER OF THE WORLD. Go back to the definitions above and pay particular attention to the words CAPITOL, CROWN and TEMPLE. 1776 signifies the birth of the New World Order under the Crown Temple. That's when their American Crown Colonies became the chartered government called the United States, thanks to the Declaration of Independence. Since that date, the United Nations (another legal Crown Temple by charter) rose up and refers to every nation as a State member.

The Wizard of Oz = the Crown Temple

This is not a mere child's story written by L. Frank Baum. What symbol does "Oz" stand for? Ounces Gold What is the yellow brick road? Bricks or ingot bars of gold.

The character known as the Straw Man represents that fictitious ALL CAPS legal fiction - a PERSON - the Federal U.S. Government created with the same spelling as your Christian birth name. Remember what the Straw Man wanted from the Wizard of Oz? A brain! No legal fiction has a brain because they have no breath of life! What did he get in place of a brain? A Certificate. A Birth Certificate for a new legal creation. He was proud of his new legal status, plus all the other legalisms he was granted. Now he becomes the true epitome of the brainless sack of straw who was given a Certificate in place of a brain of common sense.

What about the Tin Man? Does Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) mean anything to you? The poor TIN Man just stood there mindlessly doing his work until his body literally froze up and stopped functioning. He worked himself to death because he had neither heart nor soul. He's the heartless and emotionless creature robotically carrying out his daily task as if he was already dead. He's the ox pulling the plough and the mule toiling under the yoke. His masters keep him cold on the outside and heartless on the inside in order to control any emotions or heart he may get a hold of.

The pitiful Cowardly Lion was always too frightened to stand up for himself. Of course, he was a bully and a big mouth when it came to picking on those smaller than he was. They act as if they have great courage, but they really have none at all. All roar with no teeth of authority to back them up. When push came to shove, the Cowardly Lion always buckled under and whimpered when anyone of any size or stature challenged him. He wanted courage from the Grand Wizard, so he was awarded a medal of "official" recognition. Now, regardless of how much of a coward he still was, his official status made him a bully with officially recognised authority. He's just like the Attorneys who hide behind the Middle Courts of the Temple Bar.

What about the trip through the field of poppies? They weren't real people, so drugs had no effect on them. The Wizard of Oz was written at the turn of the century, so how could the author have known America was going to be drugged? The Crown has been playing the drug cartel game for centuries. Just look up the history of Hong Kong and the Opium Wars. The Crown already had valuable experience conquering all of China with drugs, so why not the rest of the world?

Who finally exposed the Wizard for what he really was? Toto, the ugly (or cute, depending on your perspective) and somewhat annoying little dog. Toto means "in total, all together; Latin in toto." Notice how Toto was not scared of the Great Wizard's theatrics, yet he was so small in size compared to the Wizard, no-one seemed to notice him. The smoke, flames and hologram images were designed to frighten people into doing as the Great Wizard of Oz commanded. Toto simply went over, looked behind the curtain - the court - (see the definition for curtain above), saw it was a scam, and started barking until others paid attention to him and came to see what all the barking was about. Just an ordinary person controlling the levers that created the illusions of the Great Wizard's power and authority.

The veil hiding the corporate legal fiction and its false courts was removed. The Wizard's game was up. It's too bad that people don't realise how loud a bark from a little dog is. How about your bark? Do you just remain silent and wait to be given whatever food and recognition, if any, your legal master gives you?
Let's not forget those pesky flying monkeys. What a perfect mythical creature to symbolise the Bar Association Attorners who attack and control all the little people for the Great Crown Wizard, the powerful and grand Bankers of Oz - Gold.

What is it going to take to expose the Wizard and tear down the court veil for what they really are? Each of us needs only a brain, a heart and soul, and courage. Then, and most importantly, we all need to learn how to work together. Only "in toto," working together as one Body of the King of Kings.

Mystery Babylon Revealed

There is no mystery behind the current abomination of Babylon for those who discern His Truth:
And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. . . . . -Revelation 17:5
God has reserved His judgment for the great idolatress, Rome, the chief seat of all idolatry, that rules over many nations with whom the kings have committed to the worship of her idols (see Revelation 17:1-4). The Pope and His purported Church; sitting on the Temple throne at the Vatican; ruling the nations of the earth through the Crown Temple of ungodly deities are the Rule and Order of Babylon; the Crown of godlessness and the Code of commerce.

One may call the Rule of the world today by many names: The New World Order (a Bush family favourite), the Third Way (spoken by Tony Blair and Bill Clinton), the Illuminati, Triad, Triangle, Trinity, Masonry, the United Nations, the EU, the US, or many dozens of other names. However, they all point to one origin and one beginning. We have traced this in history to the CrownTemple, the Temple Church circa 1200. Because the Pope created the Order of the TempleKnights (the Grand Wizards of deception) and established their mighty TempleChurch in the sovereign City of London, it is the Vatican and it's Roman Capitols that control the world, as a system.

"And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication" . . . . -Revelation 17:4

This verse appears to be an accurate description of the Pope and His Bishops for the past 1,700 years. The idolatries of commerce in the world: all the gold and silver; the iron and soft metals; the money and coins and riches of the world: All of these are under the control of the CrownTemple; the Roman King and his false Church; the throne of Babylon; attended to by his Templar Knights, the Wizards of abomination and idolatry.
"The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman [mother of harlots] sitteth" - Revelation 17:9
The only mention of "seven mountains" within our present-day Bible is at Revelation 17:9, so it's no wonder this has been a mystery to the current Body of Christ. The 1611 King James (who was a Crown Templar) Bible is not the entire canon of the early church ("church" in Latin ecclesia; in Greek ekklesia). This in itself is no mystery as history records the existence and destruction of these early church writings; just as history has now proven their genuine authenticity with the appearance of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Coptic library at Nag Hagmadi in Egypt, among many other recent Greek language discoveries within the past 100 years.

The current Bible quotes the Book of Enoch numerous times:

By faith Enoch was taken away so that he did not see death, "and was not found, because God had taken him"; for before he was taken he had this testimony, that he pleased God. . . . - Hebrews 11:5
Now Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied about these men also, saying, "Behold, the Lord comes with ten thousands of His saints, to execute judgment on all, to convict all who are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have committed in an ungodly way, and of all the harsh things which ungodly sinners have spoken against Him." . . . - Jude 1:14-15

The Book of Enoch was considered scripture by most early Christians. The earliest literature of the so-called "Church Fathers" is filled with references to this mysterious book. The second century Epistle of Barnabus makes much use of the Book of Enoch. Second and Third Century "Church Fathers," such as Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Origin and Clement of Alexandria, all make use of the Book of Enoch "Holy Scripture". The Ethiopic Church included the Book of Enoch to its official canon. It was widely known and read the first three centuries after Christ. However, this and many other books became discredited after the Roman Council of Laodicea. Being under ban of the Roman Papal authorities, afterwards they gradually passed out of circulation.

At about the time of the Protestant Reformation, there was a renewed interest in the Book of Enoch, which had long since been lost to the modern world. By the late 1400s, rumours began to spread that a copy of the long lost Book of Enoch might still exist. During this time, many books arose claiming to be the lost book but were later found to be forgeries.

The return of the Book of Enoch to the modern western world is credited to the famous explorer James Bruce, who in 1773 returned from six years in Abyssinia with three Ethiopic copies of the lost book. In 1821, Richard Laurence published the first English translation. The now famous R.H. Charles edition was first published by Oxford Press in 1912. In the following years, several portions of the Greek text also surfaced. Then, with the discovery of cave number four of the Dead Sea Scrolls, seven fragmentary copies of the Aramaic text were discovered.

Within the Book of Enoch is revealed one of the mysteries of Babylon concerning the seven mountains she sits upon (underlining has been added):

[CHAPTER 52] 2 There mine eyes saw all the secret things of heaven that shall be; a mountain of iron, a mountain of copper, a mountain of silver, a mountain of gold, a mountain of soft metal, and a mountain of lead.
6 These [6] mountains which thine eyes have seen: The mountain of iron, the mountain of copper, the mountain of silver, the mountain of gold, the mountain of soft metal, and the mountain of lead. All these shall be in the presence of the Elect One as wax: Before the fire, like the water which streams down from above upon those mountains, and they shall become powerless before his feet. 7 It shall come to pass in those days that none shall be saved, either by gold or by silver, and none be able to escape. 8 There shall be no iron for war, nor shall one clothe oneself with a breastplate. Bronze shall be of no service, tin shall be of no service and shall not be esteemed, and lead shall not be desired. 9 All these things shall be denied and destroyed from the surface of the earth when the Elect One shall appear before the face of the Lord of Spirits.'

[CHAPTER 24] 3 The seventh mountain was in the midst of these, and it excelled them in height, resembling the seat of a throne; and fragrant trees encircled the throne.

[CHAPTER 25] 3 And he answered saying: This high mountain which thou hast seen, whose summit is like the throne of God, is His throne, where the Holy Great One, the Lord of Glory, the Eternal King, will sit, when He shall come down to visit the earth with goodness. 4 As for this fragrant tree, no mortal is permitted to touch it until the great judgement when He shall take vengeance on all and bring (everything) to its consummation for ever. 5 It shall then be given to the righteous and Holy. Its fruit shall be for food to the elect: It shall be transplanted to the Holy place, to the temple of the Lord, the Eternal King. 6 Then shall they rejoice with joy and be glad, and into the Holy place shall they enter; its fragrance shall be in their bones and they shall live a long life on earth, such as thy fathers lived: In their days shall no sorrow, or plague, or torment, or calamity touch them.'

The present wealth and power of all the world's gold, silver, tin, bronze, pearls, diamonds, gemstones, iron, and copper belonging the Babylon whore, and held in the treasuries of her Crown Templar banks and deep stony vaults, will not be able to save them at the time of the Lord's judgment.
But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in [yourselves], neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in. . . . - Matthew 23:13

Where do we go from here?

Now that their false Temple has been exposed, how does this apply to the Kingdom of Heaven? To reach the end, you must know the beginning. For everything ordained of God, there is an imitation ordained of evil that looks like the genuine thing. There is the knowledge of good and the knowledge of evil. The problem is, most believe they have the knowledge of God when what they really have is knowledge of world deceptions operating as gods. The only way to discern and begin to understand the Kingdom of Heaven is to seek the Knowledge that comes only from God, not the knowledge of men who take their legal claim as earthly rulers and gods.

The false Crown Temple and its Grand Wizard Knights have led the world to believe that they are of the Lord God and hold the knowledge and keys to His Kingdom. What they hold within their Temples are the opposite. They claim to be the "Holy Church," but which holy church? The real one or the false one? Are the Pope and his Roman Church the Temple of God, or is this the unholy Temple of Babylon sitting upon the seven mountains?

They use the same words, but alter them to show the true meaning they have applied: The State is not a state; a Certificate is not a certification. The Roman Church is not the church (ekklesia). There is the Crown of the Lord; and a Crown of that which is not of the Lord. All imitations appear to be the genuine article, but they are fakes. Those who are truly seeking the genuine Kingdom of God must allow the Lord to show them the discernment between the genuine and the imitation. Without this discernment by the Holy Spirit, all will remain fooled by the illusions of false deity emanating from the unholy spirits of the Wizards.

Neither shall they say, Lo here! Or, lo there! For behold, the kingdom of God is within you. - Luke 17:21
Jesus said, "If your leaders say to you, 'Look, the (Father's) kingdom is in the sky,' then the birds of the sky will precede you. If they say to you, 'It is in the sea,' then the fish will precede you. Rather, the FATHER'S kingdom is within you and it is outside you." - Gospel of Thomas 3

Don't you know that you are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God lives in you?- 1 Corinthians 3:16

Jesus said, "Know what is in front of your face, and what is hidden from you will be disclosed to you. For there is nothing hidden that will not be revealed. [And there is nothing buried that will not be raised."] . . . . Gospel of Thomas 5

So my friends…Things are certainly not as they seem…"


That is a lot of information to digest. Take your time.

I look forward to your comments.

CR.

62 comments:

Anonymous said...

Why didn't you just copy and paste "Illuminatus"? It would make about as much fucking sense. This is just total fucking bollocks. I am aware that the world is a fucked-up place and that those in charge are a set of deeply unpleasant venal fuckwits. To dress it all up in a fourth form conspiracy theory does not help your cause one little bit.

I am a regular reader of your blog and I am largely sympathetic to your point of view, but this is just a load of time-wasting hysterical wank.

Captain Ranty said...

Anon,

A well constructed argument.

Peppered, as it is, with counter-logic and an alternative theory, it really is difficult for me to defend my "cause".

You firmly demolished that fourth form conspiracy bollocks.

/sarcasm off/

It is not my writing. I thought it was well researched-yes, there are a couple of wild claims in there-but I thought it was interesting enough to put up.

I don't need sympathy. If that is your only motivation for coming here then I suggest that you stop.

CR.

Harbinger said...

An interesting (long post) there Cap'n and something I'll have another read of later. Interesting in today's day and age with an internet waiting to tell you what the MSM won't there are 'regular' readers who still choose to hide under 'anonymous' monikers instead of be honest and show their true face, so as to not sully their image, normally portrayed in their replies. Hysterical, no fact based retorts usually receive a hearty chuckle.

Ironically, the whole of history has been one big fucking conspiracy, when people simply forget that to conspire merely involves two or more people colluding to the overall detriment of others in private. And how many times has this happened?

However to finish off CR, I think the holocaust is up there for one of the greatest lies ever told. 6 million never died and there was NO holocaust (whole fire in Greek). There was however a holocaust in Dresden, Nagasaki and Hiroshima, to name a few....

Anonymous said...

Harbinger- yeah, I'm one of those nasty "anon" commenters. fucking way lower down the human totem pole than, say, the sort of inadequate sick fuck who chooses not to believe that the Holocaust ever happened.

And Ranty- I don't care how "well-researched" it is (and it isn't), utter fucking shite is still utter fucking shite. And if it appeals to the likes of "Harbinger" then fucking count me out. One of the reasons I'm keeping anon is because I don't want cunts like that pursuing me all over cyberspace.

Anonymous said...

cr
just found this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_y-gLm9Hrw

trippymalc

Captain Ranty said...

Anon,

"..utter fucking shite" is an opinion. You should preface your remarks with "In my opinion". Unless, of course, you are able to deconstruct the article properly.

I have no idea how much of it is supportable. I have no idea how much of it is fact. I merely thought it read well, and it offered an alternative viewpoint.

I have been trying to do that ever since this blog was born. I have never expected everyone to believe everything that is posted here.

Other than spam, I have never deleted a single disparaging, or dissenting comment.

But to simply say something is bollocks isn't good enough.

Harbinger, like you, is entitled to his own beliefs and opinions.

If you don't like the message, FFS don't shoot the messenger. Tell him/her why you think they are wrong.

CR.

Harbinger said...

Anonymous,

Try reading the post again, although I must say you never understood it first time around, therefore I doubt you'll understand it second time around.

However I "shall" try to explain:

The holocaust never happened for in the definition of the word holocaust (which I gave a defintion about) 6million Jews were not BURNED ALIVE, although the Germans and Japanese were, but hey, who wants to bother with facts eh?
Secondly it is impossible to burn 6million Jews for the fact that they'd still be burning them to this day and more importantly, earth samples taken from ALL the concentration camps prove this 'small fact' to be true.

I never denied there was no persecution of Jews, just that there was no holocaust in the definition of the word, something your tiny brain is unable to comprehend (along with the majority of braindeads within society who cry when they watch a Steven Spielberg movie on behalf of IngSoc or should I say ZionSoc).
You call me a 'sick fuck' because emotive reasoning has long replaced any for of common sense logic within your cerebellum.
It is also worth noting that while Jews died in world war 2 (far, far less than the 6million number) far, far more non Jews died also, in a number that overwhelmingly shades their death toll in comparison. However, when you have a Jewish controlled MSM then it's very easy to elevate yourself into the world's biggest victim. Also worth noting as well that there's nothing mentioned whatsoever of the holodomor, where in one year alone under 10million Russian Christians were starved to death by the Bolshevik (Jewish Zionist) Red Army.

I have just stated some truths above that you will find hard to bear, but hey, you know what they say eh? - The Truth hurts.

Try some Kevin Myers also:

There was no Holocaust: Kevin Myers

And final post on this to you. I'm not clogging up the Capn's blog, decimating your futile arguments. Except it and shut up. Even better go out and get an education, preferably not a Zionist controlled state one.

Harbinger said...

Captain,

One of my posts has gone into your spam folder. I think it's because there was a link on it.

mescalito said...

Anonymous- good link, savage though, using those two dopes to attack the whole freeman movement.
dangerous slander, lucky they haven't tried something like that here yet, guess it wont be long though.
everyone should watch this, heres the link again:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_y-gLm9Hrw

what's everyone else's thoughts on this???

Harbinger said...

CR,

"If you don't like the message, FFS don't shoot the messenger. Tell him/her why you think they are wrong."

That's the problem therein. The ability of common sense, logical, critical thought enabled debate, has long gone into the bin for illogical, emotive reasoning - cry/shout the loudest and you automatically win the argument.

The very fact that people are now imprisoned for their opinion proves disconnect in the prosecution's argument and worse still, ignorance within a society who think speech shouldn't be free and worse still a punishable offense.

The reason people tend to drop into furious insult is for the simple reason they have no argument. They are in the sorry position of having been indoctrinated by a mass, main stream media and education system and like the political system, they find it inconceivable that both should contemplate the thought of deceit upon a far too trusting public. Ergo, when a different opinion is risen, backed up by fact, or should I say a non disputable argument, then their thought process goes into a total meltdown, seeing as they have nothing constructive to say and better still able to defend their beliefs.

This is the problem with society. The hatred within is due to the missing information, when they do actually think there may be an alternative to the false facade reality they live within. People start to get angry because one discovered lie is merely the tip of the iceberg and to their horror realise they're swimming in an ocean of deceit. It's a terrible situation to be in, but be in they must for if not change will never come and society will continue to plummet deeper and deeper in totalitarianism and hellish persecution of all.

Harbinger said...

mescalito,

"what's everyone else's thoughts on this???"

Well, 'radical right' and 'radical anti government movement' pretty much sums up the indoctrination of society via the state. The fact that the useful idiots presenting their cases within this video, like to use the CIA orchestrated bombing in Oklahoma as defense proves their undefendable argument. The fact they attack citizens for believing that the state doesn't have the right to tax and oppress their citizens also proves their argument is far from water tight.

This video is nothing but NWO attack on society, a society that's beginning to see the bigger picture, of what's really going on and deciding to say "you don't own nor control me or this land we live in."

Unless the police start to wise up then they will merely become target practice for the public, who will start to go after their controllers. The police will have a choice and that's either to fulfill their obligation to protect and serve the people or defend the NWO, which they are all doing at the moment. I have no sympathy for the police anymore. I used to but police brutality is on the rise as they become more distant to the people, preparing to take 30 pieces of silver from their controllers.

That's what I think.

mescalito said...

yeah i agree on most of that, i mean i dont like the police but its a shame they lost there lives to some rednecks who are ruining it for all of us.
They are so full of shit in that video it is unbelievable, particularly to anyone who is on a site like this. one case when someone who calls themselves a freeman shoots 2 cops and all of a sudden we are all murderers, REALLY!
they have no honour, never did never will, they are only prolonging the inevitable, i just hope the general public have stirred even slightly enough from their sleep to see through these lies.

Twisted Root said...

I think the video is dangerous propaganda. It is classic guilt by association, it increases fear, separation and hatred.

Exploiting the deaths of those two officers to do so is wicked. The SPLC has a long history of this and I am not afraid to so say so.

A video depicting the violence carried out on behalf of the system the SPLC so tirelessly and deviously defends would last until the end of time. Peacefully removing the system's power is the only way to go.

mescalito said...

twisted root- is it possible to peacefully remove the systems power?

can we rely on awareness alone?

Caratacus said...

Coffee?!

I've just opened a couple of bottles of red, a half-bottle of grouse is within easy reach and a couple of pasties are in the oven.

This is going to take a while...

Anonymous said...

I spent a year studying Auschwitz.
Met 2 survivors.

There was no massive, and it would need to be massive, piles of coal or wood to burn the bodies....

CR you may have gone overboard with stuff for the sheeple.

sike said...

There is a lot of useful and true stuff here . Picking that out from the wild claims and imaginative flourishes is a tricky one .
Some of the stuff about crown agents can be supported with other sources . http://wikispooks.com/wiki/Document:Crown_Agents

Twisted Root said...

mescalito

Yes. But only you can do it and you can only do it for yourself.

85% of enslavement is enslavement of the mind and it is the most evil form of enslavement.

That's the meaning by the way of the all seeing eye. If a slave believeshe is watched where ever he goes, then what is the point in escaping?

Harbinger said...

mescalito,

"i mean i dont like the police but its a shame they lost there lives to some rednecks who are ruining it for all of us."

Fuck 'em quite frankly. The murderers of these cops, who are enforcing a law for profit upon people, will most certainly be jailed for a long time, if not given the death sentence. What about the police who have happily murdered innocent people in cold blood (in the UK I can think of Harry Stanley, De Menenez, Ian Tomlinson to name but a few) get a slap on the wrist and keep their jobs?

Bottom line, there will come a time when the police will have to make a choice to the people - "you're with us or againt us."

In all reality I couldn't give a shite about one dead cop, or two, or a hundred... I think they've seriously ruined any respectable reputation through their behaviour over the decades and if people want to blame them saying they've been brainwashed then all I'll say is - "who's the bigger fool the fool or the fool that follows?"

The police are part of a corrupt institution that continually oppresses and lies to the people, they again lie stating they protect. Therefore it goes without saying that if you're part of a corrupt system you are therefore corrupt also.
I just don't think the police realise that they're looking at the prospect of becoming the next dodo in society. They are bullies. They abuse their power. They are untrustworthy and always have been. They are incompetent at their job. They are unable to solve crimes. They protect the minority over the majority. They are weak, many and unable to do their job of preventing crime. They are part of the problem and therefore no longer part of the solution. They will be dealt with accordingly in the future when the shit hits the fan and if they don't see this, then it proves just how fucking stupid they really are and therefore be as close to public protection as the earth is to pluto.

When I think of the times I've gone to the aid of pigs getting a kicking, I should have left them, seeing how they treat the public today.

mescalito said...

twisted root- :) fine words.
but they are purposely ignoring the peaceful words of everyone who contributes to the movement, they are forcing a violent outcome as that is the last option, plus then they could commence martial law and any other dirty plans.
i do see their ship sinking through the awareness being spread, its just a bit frustrating how slow it is, and having to see their efforts of slandering the freemen and women is a piss take.

Twisted Root said...

mescalito

True. Power is never voluntarily relinquished. I don't think we've seen anything yet.

Martial law is just another threat of violence, more fear.

Awareness is spreading, but don't get down about the pace of it. You can only show people, they have to make the choice themselves. It is a choice; and many will chose to stay where they are come what may.

mescalito said...

Harbinger- again i agree, they have blood on their hands too, they are useless, and your point of being part of the corrupt system makes them corrupt is spot on, although some join for the reason of spreading truth and justice they end up caught up in it all, especially if they have a wife, kids and a mortgage to maintain.
they have to be educated then its up to them to make a choice whose side there on when it does kick off, if they know the truth and still stand for the corrupt state then what ever happens to them is their fault, and will not care in the slightest.

mescalito said...

twisted root- thanks, i needed that.

its always a pleasure speaking or even having heated debates with you all on here.

safety and peace be with you.

Anonymous said...

The article is instructive and interesting, but it is also very, very, very long - and difficult to read through.

It would be nice, on very lengthy articles to have something like they have with online journals, a synopsis or outline at the top or bottom - so then one can get the gist of the argument more quickly and see if there are particular areas to hone in on first, if one is reading on spare time.

But interest, nice and will try coming back to re-read the entire lengthy article one day again.

Not complaining, just saying, a synopsis or brief outline section above or below would have been nice - and may have drawn in some persons with less time on their hands to come back and read more in depth - as it is a tad bit long.

Caratacus said...

Firstly, I am a simple soul but recognise there are complexities in life and I try to understand them as best I can.

I do confess that my first reaction to this sort of thing is amusement but readily admit that this is more a reflection of my own shortcomings than anything else; but I have noticed this in my short and merry career on this planet - men do like to layer upon layer upon layer all sorts of crap to say something as simple as "this is a broom, use it to sweep the room".

Yes there are people who regard themselves as being apart and above the rest of us, but they have two arms, two legs, two eyes the same as the rest of us - they even sit down to have a crap for the most part. And they are as vulnerable to external events as the rest of us too, a fact they may do well to remember in these unpredictable times.

I am rambling, Captain, for which I apologise (halfway through the Grouse.). Let me finish by saying, "My conscience is mine, my freedom is mine, and my justice is a sovereign justice". Not my words, may have been Proudhon(?) but then I am a simple soul and need the words of others sometimes to summarise what I am trying to say. My own words are more pungent and less forgiving.

Harbinger said...

Anonymous, (to that one of many on here who this is addressed to)

If you happen to do some research on Auschwitz for example, you'll find that those who died, died through typhus, hunger/starvation, over work and old age. These camps were there to serve the German war effort and were filled with all manner of people, not just Jews. More so, if you care to investigate more you'll find how much tonnage of coal was used.

They say that in Auschwitz, they were killing up to 50/60k Jews/people a day. That means 42 every minute - 2,500 every hour. That's a lot of people and a massive effort. More so if you're cremating this number you'd need enough fuel to burn these cadavers. On average, to cremate a body using coal/coke you need 40/50kg. Therefore to cremate 60,000 people you'd need 3,000 tonnes to do so every day. In the archives, taken by the Russians at the end of WW2 the running of Auschwitz was written down and during the whole war 2,188 tonnes of coke was shipped into Auschwitz.

More so, in the British/Allied archives of WW2, they have aerial pictures of Auschwitz. There are no queues into the crematoria; no queues of people waiting to be executed by firing squad/gas chamber; no mass pits for the bodies to be disposed in and the coup de grace - IF THEY WERE BURNING BODIES ALL DAY LONG THERE WOULD BE SO MUCH SMOKE YOU WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO SEE INTO THE CAMP!

So you see Anonymous, when history comes under scrutiny, Auschwitz has so many holes, the ship sinks. The story we know of it is nothing but lie, after lie after lie. The amount of coke that was shipped to Auschwitz during the whole war prove that it cremated between 70-80,000 bodies. After the war the Russians released 46 volumes with some 66,000 names of people dead in Auschwitz. Now we know that bodies were burned (holocaust); we have the total tonnage of coal and therefore can deduce how many bodies were cremated. And yet this evidence, this fact is still completely overlooked and denied??

However, the most important testament that something is being hidden about WW2 and the 'holocaust' is that people are actually imprisoned for questioning the official story of it. To quote John Bryant on truth (on my blog title):

"The reason men are silenced is not because they speak falsely, but because they speak the truth. This is because if men speak falsehoods, their own words can be used against them; while if they speak truly, there is nothing which can be used against them except force."

This WILL BE MY LAST on Auschwitz and the 'holocaust' but when figures and facts are presented over hearsay from Jewish survivors (seem to be rather a lot of them) who do you believe? Remember emotive illogic has taken precedence over old school, common sense, critical thinking logic. The backbone of a liberty loving and fair society.

Revolution Harry said...

Crikey, it was a long article. As I was reading it I kept recognising different bits from stuff I've read before. It seems, therefore, to be an amalgamation of several articles that have been poorly combined and as such repeats itself in several places. The same information could have been presented in an article half the current ones length.

There was also a curious mixture of verifiable fact with less supportable claims. In the main the information about the bloodlines controlling the Vatican, controlling the Crown (with the 'Royal' family representing the Crown but who in turn may also be members of the bloodline ruling families) which in turn controls Britain, the Commonwealth, the USA and much else besides seems to be largely true based on my research so far.

One 'State' that wasn't mentioned was the 'State of Israel'. I've read elsewhere that Israel is Crown controlled. Although I've seen no firm evidence it certainly seems plausible when considering Britain's (the Crown's) role in its creation.

References to the Bible and other religious writing always causes difficulties with some. Have no doubt though that this 'conspiracy' we face isn't just about worldly gain or temporal power. It's also, if not primarily, about spiritual power and control. Exactly what is going on in this regard is beyond me at present but I've long learned not to dismiss any information about or references to the Bible.

At one point we read that:

"Only a state citizen has natural and common law rights by the paramount authority of God's Law."

I'm not sure that's strictly true in the sense that any freeborn human has 'has natural and common law [God given] rights'. I don't think we have to be 'state citizens' in order to exercise those rights. However exercising them is surely where our salvation lies. Everything flows from the idea that we are sovereign individuals born with these rights.

At first glance this appears to validate the 'Freeman' concept and to a large degree it does. There may, though, be a trap that's being laid. Critics of the Freeman movement that I've come across generally decry it as an 'I'm alright Jack' or 'survival of the fittest' group of individuals who are only interested in what's good for themselves.

Without going into great detail the point I'm trying to make is that the rule of 'Mystery Babylon' and its Papal, Crown Temple, system needs to be removed and replaced. What we need to focus on surely is what do we replace it with. Deciding what that is then working to implement it will be the first step to freeing ourselves and others. Stepping out of the system and becoming 'Freemen' may not be enough on its own.

Revolution Harry said...

One final point. From some of the research I've done I've come to the conclusion that the present 'system' is due to be 'destroyed' and replaced. The power centres (London, Rome and Washington DC) are also to be moved. Israel is definitely one of the new, proposed, power centres and others mentioned have been Dubai and a rebuilt Babylon (currently under construction in Iraq). China also seems a distinct possibility when you consider the effort taken to build it up by the relocation of manufacturing capabilities and the allowing for the holding of so much of the West's 'debt'. If this is the case we must surely take great care in how we, in this country, attempt to dismantle the power and control of a Crown that's already due to be destroyed (or transferred elsewhere). It's been suggested that the loss of our manufacturing capability, gold reserves, huge pubic and private debt and mass immigration are just a few of the things designed to hinder our attempts to do anything this move into a new 'system' (NWO). As researcher Alan Watt said, they have always moved their power centres over time. They do this when the reserves (human and material) have been depleted or served their purpose. When they do they always destroy the old centre so that it cannot rise up and pose a threat to the new one and so that it is also more easily subsumed into it.

richard said...

Have you seen "ring of power; empire of the cities" on youtube? It goes into the matters raised in this post, in particular the origin of the "crown". There is much to consider, and it doesn't do to be dismissive without a bit of background history. There's more to the Crown than meets the eye.

NewsboyCap said...

Captain,

Holy shit that raised the temp a few degrees.It was a long post, needing much research.
RE: Harbinger, its physically impossible to move, load on to wagons
push said wagons,load into crematoria
2,500 dead bodies an hour, 24 hours every day.And get rid of the 'evidence' without a fully mechanised system.Sorry Anon: it just can't be done!

Anarchyland said...

Will have to get a copy of the wizard of oz. Maybe Pandora's box too. Another evening, another serious amount of learning.. thanks CR =]

libertarianroguetrooper said...

My question would be; so what?
If this information is all true what does it really matter to us.

It is no secret powerful men have always tinkered and controlled the world.

As someone whose relatives were hunted like animals in the Belorussian forests for being poor Jews I'm absolutely disgusted by the crap being posted here about the Holocaust.

Harbringer; take a read of Police Battalion 101.

Captain Ranty said...

LRT,

The point of the post is to offer information which may not be widely known. In my opinion more of it is true than false so I thought it was at least good for debate.

I haven't commented on the Holocaust because I don't know enough about it.

But the same rule applies: if new (or different) information comes to light, why should we not consider it? The kneejerk response seems to be "You are a holocaust denier". (Which, by default, makes you a twat). But all I see here is people using information to prove that the logistics don't add up. No-one has said that murdering Jews was a good thing, just that the numbers don't add up.

Is it possible that the history we were taught in this regard was wrong?

Asking that question doesn't make me a twat. I have taken on board tons of information during my life that I am now having to unlearn because they sold me a load of shite and told me it was gold-dust.

Question everything. Especially if it rocks your world.

CR.

Giolla Decair said...

Taking the article purely at face value one thing that strikes me is that if the Magna Carta is invalid then lawful rebellion isn't possible as that's based on Magna Carta as are a lot of the rights we're trying to reclaim - so following that route leaves us rather stuffed. On the other hand if we act on the assumption that Magna Carta is valid, then so much of the rest of this article collapses as a lot of it hangs off Magna Carta removing the powers of the Monarch to Rome.

So trying to stick with our various charters etc. as written either Magna Carta is valid in which case much of this article is a load of nonsense (and some of it does seem rather wild but even without the wild bits there's food for thought here) or if Magna Carta isn't valid due to an earlier oath of fealty from the Monarch to Rome, then we're fighting the wrong battle by pursuing Lawful Rebellion.

I could of course have missed something.

Captain Ranty said...

Giolla,

MC has to be valid. There is no way 65 peers would put their name to a document in 2001 (the Barons Committee) if it was defunct.

They endorsed Lawful Rebellion. They used MC to do so. I would say we can bank on them knowing their stuff.

As you say, the piece is interesting but heavily slanted on the religious side. Like you guys, I am still chewing on the bones.

I have not yet decided that it is all solid. I am decidely more careful about what information I accept totally, but some of this resonates.

CR.

Harbinger said...

Libertarian Rogue Trooper,

"I'm absolutely disgusted by the crap being posted here about the Holocaust."

Who gives you the right to control freedom of speech? Who gives you the right to judge what people should say or do? Who gives you the right to question other people's questioning on history?

John Bryant stated that most of those who read about the holocaust ended up becoming holocaust revisionists. It's true because most people tend to seek the truth and find the connections of the then and the now and as to why things are so fucked up.

And ironically you call yourself 'libertarian...?'
Read some John Bryant to understand what a Libertarian is. And no I'm not talking of the NuLibertarian movement hijacked by the socialists, the liberals and the Conservatives, but the true Libertarians, those who believe first and foremost in liberty and freedom.

Now, understand one thing about holocaust revisionists - the media lies about them, because it's a Jewish controlled media, more importantly Zionist, which not only threw Jews under the bus in WW2, but uses this to bolster the illegal state of Israel. You need to do some research.

There are so many holes in the story of the holocaust that what we read is laughable. If you want to understand hysteria; if you want to understand emotive media manipulation of public thought watch the following video on Donahue and look at the Jewesses they've flown in who whine like harpies, speaking of smelling the 'chicken' (burning bodies) and of the human lampshades and soap - even though these stories have been proved as hoaxes. This is the power of the media and he who controls the media controls public thought.

Lastly, why on earth would the Nazis murder their own workforce, who were vitally important to their war effort? This is just one of the many questions, but yet again, the holocaust has become a religion, hence the persecution of those who try to question it. It is nothing more than going back to the Dark and Middle ages with the Christian church and this is exactly why this is so. Fear is used to try and destroy the truthseekers and persecution is the answer to those who find it.

You need to educate yourself instead of whining on about something you clearly have no idea about whatsoever. Capn' doesn't speak about it because he has the honesty to say so. Do you?

Harbinger said...

P.S.

The link to the Donahue show and I suggest you watch this classic piece of media manipulation of fact when presented it, ironically by a Jewish investigator. Classic example of propaganda, denial of truth and emotive reasoning.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uH10Xf2D0jg

libertarianroguetrooper said...

Harbring, woah there.

Yup I can be disgusted buddy but I'm not telling you to say otherwise. I'm not silencing you, just saying I think it disgusting. You've drawn this massive inference I'm trying to silence you because I have expressed an emotive opinion.

Well done, seriously sir, well done you have brought us down to the level of Granudiad CIF commenters...

Nothing will happen to me tmr morning for this, I won't wake up with cancer, nor will you. It is an opinion. No more no less. SO before you start slinging mud take a look at the idea of disgust vs me calling you and others a liar eh?

I actually have done quite a lot of reading and work on it, but really I don't see the point of engaging. I'm not whining on about it either.

Again have you read Police Battalion 101? I happily admit I don't know as much about the concentration camps as you claim to, I do know from personal family history however that great numbers of POOR Jewish peasants AND regular peasants were shot by the Nazis.

CR I didn't call you a twat, and thanks for responding, I do understand those reasons.

Underwhelmed said...

CR, crikey what a long post!

Lots of interesting items in there - but far too much 'accepted fact' that is nothing of the sort. For the article to be credible, it needs to refer to credible research and sources, which it fails to do.

However there were interesting items (that were sourced) on the etymology of legal parlance.

On a Freeman level, the most interesting point of course, is the assertation that we are all vassels of Rome owing to John's betrayal. On this point I must disagree for it was an unlawful signing of power over and beyond his authority. Ergo it can have no lawful or legal authority. And on that point and for that reason, he was removed from the throne.

Once you remove this aspect, a lot of the rest falls down. Although, as someone who spends a lot of time working in Grey's Inn Road, the way the Bar etc is said to work was fascinating; but I'll take it as an opinion rather than fact until credible sources are found.

Thanks for continuing to try and stimulate our minds.

Cheers,

U.

Harbinger said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Harbinger said...

libertarianroguetrooper,

"Well done, seriously sir, well done you have brought us down to the level of Granudiad CIF commenters..."

Nope, you and others have done that yourselves.

You say this:

"SO before you start slinging mud take a look at the idea of disgust vs me calling you and others a liar eh?"

followed by this:

"I happily admit I don't know as much about the concentration camps as you claim to"

Therefore, don't get into a debate on something you are clearly ignorant of. Educate yourself on a subject before entering into a debate. Instead you inevitably dig holes for yourself. And if you're disgusted by what someone else states, in this case, the holocaust, it proves that you disagree with the other's opinion and therefore the belief that the other is lying is most certainly within your thought process, or else you wouldn't be disgusted.

And lastly

"I do know from personal family history however that great numbers of POOR Jewish peasants AND regular peasants were shot by the Nazis."

And from what I know far more allied troops were also shot by the nazis, a far, far greater number than Jews - it's called war.

Captain Ranty said...

LRT,

"CR I didn't call you a twat..."

I know you didn't. It was just a generalisation.

CR.

Captain Ranty said...

U,

If you have a look around that site, you wll see that they use Papal Bulls in their efforts to unearth the real story. It is within these papal bulls that much of the information they use in the piece was found.

So, there is a lot of corroborating evidence but you need first to understand (or believe) that papal bulls are (almost) the word of god him/herself.

CR.

richard said...

Harbinger - "Why on earth would the Nazis murder their own workforce?" Firstly, because it was cheaper to replace them after working them until they died than to feed them. Secondly, the Jews had been identified as a menace to Western civilisation prior to WW2 (Mein Kampf) and were to be dealt with as and when. Thirdly, as with today's harmful products such as Aspartame, flouride, mercury lightbulbs etc, the State will harm or kill the workforce if it's profitable to do so. We are as farm animals to them.

Anonymous said...

However long this conspiracy has been going on, it still requires our blind obedience to function.

Most people despise politicians, yet still allow the system to control them.

It is amazing what you can get someone to do by manipulating their selfish self interest.

Most people are not grown up enough to embrace anything that involves them being responsible for their own actions. They would rather be slaves of the Nanny State, than their own master.

Freedom is never easy.

Giolla Decair said...

CR,

I'm with you in holding that MC is valid, but if we take that to be the case then an awful lot of this article collapses, as it's based on the crown temple acquiring the kingdom with the signing of MC in 1215.

Like I say taking this article at face value we have the choice of either MC is valid in which case much of this article is bunk. Or the article holds water and MC isn't valid and we're fighting the wrong battle.

I think MC being valid is far more likely.

Harbinger said...

Richard,

Three points to look at which are very important when it comes to discussing WW2:

1. The Jews launched a war against Germany long before the Germans the Jews (boycotting of German goods abroad) - do some research.

2. There is a difference between murdering someone (gun, gas chamber, beaten to death etc) and dying of natural causes. Overwork is a natural cause, along with typhus, starvation and old age. This is how the majority of Jews died and the overwhelming number were the middle aged and above. And believe it or not, there were non Jews in the same camps who died with them.

3. Mein Kampf rightfully portrayed the Jews as a menace but all you have to do is look further back to see just what western nations thought of the Jew:

Merchant of Venice - William Shakespeare
Charles Dickens - Oliver Twist
The Prioress' Tale - Geoffrey Chaucer
Diary of a Writer - Feodor Dostoievsky

History is littered with dislike of the Jew and yet instead of questioning why we all quite happily accept the indoctrination that "People hate Jews just because they're Jews." What utter bollox.
Tell me, 109 times from 83 lands since AD250 have Jews been evicted from lands. More so, since the 9th Century, 100 times from 83 lands have the Jews been evicted and these Jews are not the semitic Jews of the middle east, but instead the plastic, fake, false, Ashkenazi, Jews who converted en masse under orders of their King Bhulan in Khazaria - (Southern Russia). They are not related whatsoever to Shem, to the House of Juddah, nor Judea. These are the Babylonian Talmud worshipers and still, the ignorant GOY (now Jew) continues to defend a people who see themselves as ubermensch to the untermensch Goy.

It is utterly ironic, yet if a man is evicted from a bar in the city, one may feel sorry for him. Yet if he is evicted from ten, then people will ask questions. This however does not happen with Jews. They are merely forgiven and felt sorry for.

You really need to do some research on this, because I find that those who are so eager to defend Jews are 100% oblivious to history and more importantly their history.

Caedmon's Cat said...

I found the article very interesting, since it presents a plausible explanation of why everything's as messed up as it is. There have been various articles I've read in recent years on a similar theme - including a lengthy interview with Eric Jon Phelps, in which he indicates that the Jesuits are behind most of the machinations of state. His knowledge of history is impressive - he's not making it all up.
And when the trolls crawl out of their holes to play and start tirades of abuse in the comments, you can be sure it's not too far from the truth..

Captain Ranty said...

CC,

Is that the interview about the Black Pope? (Among other things).

If so, I found it fascinating. I posted it on here a while back.

CR.

richard said...

Harbinger - I knew that the Jews declared war on Germany. I am widely read. I am not defending the Jews, nor am I defending the policies of the 3rd Reich. I was arguing your point that the Reich as a State wouldn't exterminate or harm it's workers. Not only did this happen, it still does. I do not automatically give people the benefit of the doubt; this includes the Jews. As you say, it's best to establish the facts then draw your conclusions based upon those facts.

Harbinger said...

Richard,

"As you say, it's best to establish the facts then draw your conclusions based upon those facts."

The thing is I do. The script your following on Jews in German camps is the Zionist story. As you know (well I hop you do) there are three sides to every story - that of the victor, that of the defeated and the unquestionable truth.

When the camps were liberated by the allies the, Germans were almost as pleased as everyone else, for most of the guards were bags of bones themselves with the food lines having broken down due to bombing campaigns. Therefore the overwhelming number of Jews that did did so just before the end of the war through starvation.
The Jews were prisoners of war. They were political protagonists against the German nation. They were the ones who brought the war upon the Germans, whom ironically only wanted the lands back illegally taken in the 1st world war. Our nation complained of German empire building, when ours consisted of 25% of the globe, while the Germans had nothing - hypocrisy.

I do not for one minute believe that the Jews were murdered on purpose for obvious reasons, workforce as well as commands from the the government that the execution of Jews or anyone in camps was an offense punishable by death. Therefore, those that died did so through natural causes - typhus, starvation, overwork, old age.

Therefore you and I will disagree with this in all its entirety.

Caedmon's Cat said...

CR

You're right - it was about the Black Pope, who was Peter Hans Kolvenbach at the time. It was a very detailed account with loads of information about treaties and laws, as Phelps has rigorously researched the topic. He also wrote a book called 'Vatican Assassins - Wounded in the house of my friends' where he documents a lot of his findings. The interview was with Rick Martin. As a Christian I'm interested in this, as I see significant links with certain imagery in the Book Of Revelation.

Caedmon's Cat said...

Here's an excerpt from a document quoted on the TPUC site some months ago. It provides further proof of Brenda's control over America (this is not a spoof):

'...Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as follows:

S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security ( United States of America) Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997. At the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now, therefore Her Majesty an pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security
Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is please, by and with advise of Her privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered as follows:

"This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997."'

Revolution Harry said...

Captain, on the subject of whether or not the Magna Carta is a valid document or not it might be worth re-reading John Harris' 'The Treaty of Verona and the Deception That is Magna Carta'.

Giolla, you might find it interesting too.

Having read it again myself I think it offers a very good explanation as to the reason for Magna Carta. Seeing that at the time of its signing the vast majority of us would have been serfs or vassals his take on things rings true.

My only criticism of the essay is John's assertion that Jesus was a myth. I suspect that John came to this conclusion by seeding through the deception that is the Roman church and then confusing that with true Christianity. I'm not claiming to be an expert on such matters but I doubt Jesus was a myth.

On balance it's my suspicion that the CR's post above is largely correct. As John Harris points out, Magna Carta conferred certain advantages and privileges on the Baron's and at the same time regulated the slavery the majority of us were living under.

My feeling is that we don't need Magna Carta to uphold our rights as living breathing human beings. We are not 'things' or 'persons'. Magna Carta is most likely part of the very legal fiction we need to escape from. As John Harris says in the essay, it has no power over you unless you want it to and you accept the illusion.

James Higham said...

The Crown is the Inner City of London

Glad you've caught up with this, Cap'n.

http://nourishingobscurity.com/2010/01/09/sovereignty-who-actually-owns-this-nation/

Captain Ranty said...

James,

I posted this article before but then the complaints weren't that it was too long, but that it was too messy. This time I tidied it up and now there are complaints about the length! Can't win some days.

I recall your post. I even commented:

"I spend most of my days rubbing my eyes in disbelief. There is so much we don’t know. And it’s not even as if they buried it all that deeply. A wee scratch and much is revealed.

This is an excellent post James, thank you for writing it up.

CR."

It isn't until you see it written up in a potted history format that you grasp the scope of it all.

CR.

Revolution Harry said...

James, I've just read your article in the link above. Much of what you say corroborates what the article the Captain links to says with one major exception. The involvement of the Vatican. Any thoughts on this? From my humble discoveries I tend to place the Vatican at the controlling apex of this system and that includes the EU.

I'll post this at your blog as well, just in case you don't come back here.

sike said...

Does anybody have any more details about the council of Barons who declared the lawful rebellion. What have they said or done about the situation since the declaration?

Steven UK said...

Meet the Southern Poverty Law Center...

http://www.corbettreport.com/index.php?ii=327&i=Documentation

A great Corbett Report

Captain Ranty said...

Thanks Steven.

Downloading now.

CR.

Giolla Decair said...

Revolution Harry, thanks for that link just finished reading it.

Will need to read it again and ponder I think.

Anonymous said...

So good topic really i like any post talking about Ancient Egypt but i want to say thing to u Ancient Egypt not that only ... you can see in Ancient Egypt Ra God The Sun God and more , you shall search in Google and Wikipedia about that .... thanks a gain ,,,