BCG-Lawful Rebellion Update

I purloined this post from  Revolution Harry. Please read it, then DO something.


Here it is, in full:


Below is the December 2009 BCG newsletter reproduced in full. Anyone living in the Wolverhampton area who wants to join the local group please contact me at revolutionharry@macunlimited.net and I'll put you in touch with the first point of contact. Non Wulfrunians can find their nearest local group on the map on the BCG website (see link below).

PLEASE DISTRIBUTE AS WIDELY AS POSSIBLE

http://www.thebcgroup.org.uk/

Welcome to the final newsletter of the year - the end of the first year of the British Constitution Group's activity. I know things have not moved as quickly as some of you would like, and that some people are still having issues with the website (an update is coming!), but we have achieved a lot this year. None of it could have been done without your help, so we'd like to start off by giving our thanks to our activists and supporters.


WHAT HAS BEEN ACHIEVED SO FAR?

BCG members and associated groups have published three quarters of a million newspapers, given hundreds of talks, started the national campaign to report Treason at police stations, run three major conferences each attended by over 400 people, networked together a wide range of activist groups, including overseas, started 70 local BCG groups run by the "first point of contact", distributed thousands of DVDs, made appearances on television and radio and set up several new websites and local initiatives.

In these difficult times it is not easy to be optimistic, but in the last six months we have seen a step change in people's realisation that something is wrong, and they are becoming hungry for the truth.


Our profile is such that we now have a range of high quality whistle blowers from within the professional establishment, including the MOD, police, doctors, barristers, social services and local government sector. When asked, why have you approached the British Constitution Group, a common reply is that "there's no-one else to talk to." We must do everything possible to maintain this trust. Whistleblowers are vital people in exposing what is really happening at the highest levels, and there will be more.

The term and concept of Lawful Rebellion has quickly been adopted by many activist groups and individuals. Many people are angry, frustrated and ashamed at the blatant destruction of Britain. Many feel the need to lash out and some suggest violent means to achieve a turn-round in political events. Lawful Rebellion offers the opportunity to rebel and achieve results but whilst remaining peaceful in words and actions. Violent action offers the encroaching police state the opportunity to "clamp down" with yet more state oppression and even violence. Our power comes not from violence, but from numbers and coordinated action in a range of areas.

Lawful Rebellion is attractive to all generations - it offers real, positive and direct action without violence. The term is spreading fast. As is the understanding of why it is needed.

Across UK there are now thousands of people and groups linked to Lawful Rebellion. They are spread throughout Scotland, England and Wales. Others are springing up in overseas countries where a similar political agenda is underway.


LAWFUL REBELLION?

Many of you reading this already know what Lawful Rebellion is. Many of you are already implementing it. For those that have never heard of it before, and especially if the term "Rebellion" concerns you, the key qualifier is the word "Lawful."

Lawful Rebellion describes a movement, not an organisation. It is not a Political Party, nor is it aligned to any Political Party. Individuals and groups operate as a team where no one person or organisation is in control. We are simply people, groups and loose organisations gathering together in sufficient numbers so that our message(s) of concern and the truth about what is happening around us is heard and fully understood by the public at large. Exposing the truth is the first step to exposing the Treason and corruption destroying our Nation State. Awakening the 40 million UK adult voters will provide the power to remove the imposed EU dictatorship. The awakening has started and will increase at an exponential rate. Each individual's effort will help that rate accelerate.

Lawful Rebellion simply means learning to say "No!"

That's all we have to do - have the courage as individuals to say "No!" to the destruction of our Constitution, to the Treason being committed by our political leaders, to the criminal corruption at all levels of government, to the "Surveillance State", to the undermining of our currency, to the destruction of our Health Service, to the collapse of our Economy and basic economic infrastructure, to the dumbing down of our children, to the collapse of culture, to the destruction of our military, to the corporatisation of every aspect of our nation including the police and judicial system, and so on.


THE COMING YEAR

2010 is going to be a huge year for us all. It is make or break time for us as individuals and for the nation.

2010 is an election year, and it looks as if the date could be as early as the 6th March. We can see the danger of New Labour, Gordon Brown and his Marxist team. The real danger is David Cameron, who has been specifically groomed when elected to continue the Treason. This man is a Bankers' puppet, and he must not be elected.

There seems to be an intention to manage the electorate to produce a hung Parliament, with an intention to generate the lowest turnout ever by increasing the cynicism among the population to levels never seen before. A hung Parliament is the aim - with Britain being governed as a one party state within the EU.

The Lisbon Treaty is now on the statute books, unconstitutionally, treasonously, unlawfully. The first six months of next year will see what may be the last general election we see for many years to come. It is most important that we do not fall into the trap of believing that we are now locked into the EU because the Lisbon Treaty has been signed. It is unlawful, was signed by Gordon Brown with no mandate from the British Public and therefore it is irrelevant, and we should pay no heed to it.

We also expect to see a dramatic increase in the propaganda supporting Global Warming. Aside from the introduction of new taxes to bleed us dry, the Global Warming scam is designed to distract us from the final installation of a dictatorship.

We must never forget the sacrifice being bade by young service men and women who are fighting and dying in the LibLabCon's unlawful Afghan war - objective: to weaken the UK's military capability through escalating death and injury, and to deplete military capacity based within the UK so as to leave us highly vulnerable to the use of EU troops on British soil.

What does the BCG intend to do about it?

The BCG should be viewed as a catalyst, to bring together groups and individuals under an umbrella of activity, to spread the truth and the urgency of our situation far and wide. We need to mobilise millions of people, and quickly.

Our agenda is essentially about bring people together, providing them with the necessary information and ideas to act and to encourage them to get out and attack the enemy on the ground wherever possible. Our overriding ethos is Lawful Rebellion, which means saying no to the takeover of our country and using peaceful and lawful means to make our protest. We are not a political party, we do not intend to become one, we do not wish to take over any existing groups or initiatives, but we do wish to provide an umbrella to draw people together to exchange information and ideas, build both the numbers of activists and their networks and in doing so increase know-how and confidence to face the growing police state.

Now, here's the key point. This is not about control.

In view of the increasing surveillance of any individual or group that does not toe the LibLabCon pro-EU line, it is most important that we do not develop a rigid hierarchical system.

Instead, under the banner of Lawful Rebellion, BCG first points of contact will network in loose groups under their own local control and their strength will be their knowledge and understanding of politics, organisations, initiative and events being carried out by the pro-EU LibLabCon in their own area.

The door is open for non-BCG activist groups to get involved, through our first points of contact. Again, this is not about control. We see it as essential that non-BCG groups continue to do their own thing. But the door is open for them to join with us in embracing the principles of Lawful Rebellion, selling the idea to their own members, and getting all our various agendas moving in the same direction. Roger Hayes is organising a major event for mid January (see below) to start the process of inviting non-BCG groups and organisations to work with us. This will be followed up with other similar events in the coming months. If you know of a group that you think should be involved, ask them to contact Roger directly at roger@thebcgroup.org.uk.

As for the BCG itself, the organisational structure is, in essence, a groundswell resistance movement, where small groups do their own thing on a need to know basis, and with minimal advertising of how things get done. We recommend, for example, that groups do not hold traditional meetings with elected chairmen, agendas and minutes, and instead decisions are made within loose private discussions, and are communicated person to person where possible, and via other means of communication taking into account the inevitable possibility that telephone calls and emails are intercepted.

We now have over 70 local groups already organised in this way. Many are very active now - no excuses, no complaints, they are just getting on with it, and the work they are doing is fantastic. We intend to increase the membership of these local groups, and to increase the number of groups.

Beginning on the 31St of January, we are taking the BCG conferences on the road, starting in Newcastle. We will be holding these Roadshow conferences on a monthly basis throughout 2010, with smaller meetings in between. The format of the Roadshow events will be a morning session with presentations from high quality speakers on the full range of important topics. We will begin the afternoon session taking questions from the audience - we want real interaction with the audience. We want to know their concerns, their ideas, their actions. In short, anything and everything that helps us target the enemy. We will close the day with a presentation from Roger explaining Lawful Rebellion, what it means, and how we, as individuals, can put it into practice in our everyday lives. The target audience for the Roadshow events is non-members. The aim is to use the event for driving new membership, and local groups should see these events as an opportunity to build the profile of your group within your communities. We will help with that, but it's really up to you. We will be in touch with the local groups closest to the event venues in due course.

Magna Carta day is the 15th June, and there is going to be a major initiative launched on that day. We hope you will understand that we don't want to say exactly what that is at the moment. Following that, on the 19th of June, will be our National Conference, held in Stoke on Trent. This is for everyone, and we see it as an opportunity to get the hall full, circa 1000 people with a mission.

We will be in touch with all first points of contact during the first two weeks of the new year in order to schedule smaller meetings.

Finally, if you are not yet in touch with your local group, please give your local first point of contact a shout. Get involved!


SCHEDULE OF MAJOR UPCOMING EVENTS

Jan 23rd - 1st Convention To Restore National Sovereignty, Friends House, London. By invitation only.
Jan 31st - BCG Roadshow, Newcastle
Feb 27th - BCG Roadshow, Edinburgh
Mar 27th - To be announced
Apr 24th - BCG Roadshow, Liverpool
May 29th - Roadshow, Leeds
Jun 15th - Magna Carta Day
Jun 19th - BCG National Conference, Stoke on Trent
Jul 26th - BCG Roadshow, Bristol

We will be publishing a list of smaller meetings including Portsmouth, Pewsey, Brighton on the website after Christmas.


A VITAL CONVENTION TO RESTORE OUR SOVEREIGNTY.

23RD JANUARY 2010:  10am – 5pm
Friends House. Euston Road. London.

Organiser - The British Constitution Group.
Contact:  Roger Hayes. 0781 352 9383
roger@thebcgroup.org.uk

Convention to co-ordinate all pro-independence groups and activists

To formulate a strategy for: -

Lawful Rebellion against the unconstitutional and unlawful imposition of foreign governance and laws.

This convention will bring together delegates representing groups and influential individuals - to contribute their ideas and help to develop a nation-wide strategy to rapidly expand our ‘Lawful Rebellion’ campaign and co-ordinate our actions across all pro-independence groups.

This convention is not for those who are wedded to the present failed political system - we are proposing radical, but lawful and non-violent actions – to restore national sovereignty.

This convention is by invitation only as space at the event is limited. If you feel your group should be represented, please contact Roger and he will attempt to accommodate.


COMPETITION - Logo for "Lawful Rebellion"

Have you an idea for a logo which represents the principles of Lawful Rebellion? The UK Column has kindly donated a bundle of DVDs as the prize for the best suggestion. Entries to editor@ukcolumn.org, please, by the 31st December 2009.


ADVICE FOR GROUPS AND MEMBERS

Surveillance

On the subject of surveillance, the pro-EU LibLabCon would like nothing better than to scare people into not using the telephone or email, but the correct action for us is the exact opposite. Everyone is encouraged to make as many calls and emails as possible on the basis that although the automated intercept systems can cope with millions of calls per hour, these must ultimately be filtered, initially by computer and then by human operators. If the volume of intercepts needing assessment by human operators is driven to a suitably high level, the surveillance system simply becomes swamped with insufficient human operators to cope with the workload. That is why we have recently been seeing security services recruit on a large scale. BUT to keep it simple, as our numbers increase towards the hundreds of thousands, and certainly millions, the more we talk, the quicker we swamp out the system.

Truth

We must tell the truth at all times in the most simple language possible. During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act, to quote George Orwell.

But its not just about telling the truth, it is how it is told.

Weak ineffectual and misguided terms such as left wing, right wing, Europhile, Anti-EU and Credit Crunch are out.

Treason, Corruption, Fraud, Criminality, LibLabCon and the EU Police State are in.

We are not Politically Correct, and we recognise that this political trick is really cultural Marxist social control.

It is spoken and written truth that will set us free. Speak out, speak up and speak freely wherever you are.

Spreading the word

The British mainstream media and press is thoroughly corrupted and now only prints what the LibLabCon and EU Dictatorship demand. Lawful Rebellion will use every media channel to spread the truth and encourage people to stand up and be counted. Spread the word by conversation, email, letters, DVDs, recordings, papers, web and prayer. A minority that is right will soon become the majority.


That's all for now. Happy Christmas and New Year.

That Pesky Article 61

You've got to hand it to the Barons: they really knew what they were doing way back in the mists of time.

But do YOU appreciate what they did for us? Every time I mention Magna Carta 1215 it ruffles feathers, so I am going to mention it again. Or rather, one man's interpretation of it. More specifically, that pesky Article 61.

Have a look:


Lawful Rebellion.

"Some one recently asked me the question; what is Lawful Rebellion?

Rebellion in itself has a number of different meanings and is in fact quite close to another word that seems to be on everyone’s lips; Revolution. Defined meaning of Rebellion;

1. Refusal to accept some authority or code or convention.
2. An act or show of defiance toward an authority or established government.

Defined meaning of Lawful;

1. Being within the law; allowed by law: lawful methods of dissent. (The lawful refusal to conform to the authority that is unjust)

Under article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 (the founding document of our Constitution) we have a right to enter into lawful rebellion if we feel we are being governed unjustly. Contrary to common belief our Sovereign and her government are only there to govern us and not to rule us and this must be done within the constraint of our Common Law and the freedoms asserted to us by such Law, nothing can become law in this country if it falls outside of this simple constraint.

Article 61 shows quite clearly who really holds the power in this country, that being quite simply us the people; we have Sovereignty not any Parliament and nor can this be taken from us by any Parliament who claim to have taken the people’s Sovereignty. As defined above any act passed by a Parliament to remove the power the people possess, or to remove the power from the point of constraint we invested the power in, is invalid as it falls outside of the constraint laid down by Common/Constitutional Law.

This is a simple safeguard put in place to protect our freedoms under said law and to never allow such freedoms to be removed or diminished. So in reality any Act, Statute and subsequent law or legislation formed by these actions, that effects our freedoms asserted to us, is quite evidently unjust, invalid and most certainly illegal.

By invoking article 61 we are quite clearly stating that we feel we are being governed unjustly and after giving the head of state (Her Majesty) 40 day’s to correct this, if this is not corrected, then we can simply enter into lawful rebellion and we do this under the full protection of our Constitutional Law.
Lawful rebellion allows quite simply for the following recourse;

1. Full refusal to pay any forms of Tax, Fines and any other forms of monies to support and/or benefit said unlawful governance of this country.
2. Full refusal to abide by any Law, Legislation or Statutory Instrument invalidly put in place by said unlawful governance that is in breech of the Constitutional safeguard.
3. To hinder in any way possible all actions of the treasonous government of this land, who have breeched the Constitutional safeguard; defined with no form of violence in anyway, just lawful hindrance under freedom asserted by Constitutional Law and Article 61.

Above are listed the three main ways we can as a people rely upon article 61 and what this allows for. The British people were given over 700 years ago a Law to use as there recourse when faced with either a Parliamentary dictatorship, or a Sovereign trying to rule by Divine Right, which amounts to the same thing. We have a right, and a birth right at that, to be governed properly under our birth right law and no other and certainly not by laws introduced on the pretence of being British Law, when in fact all laws passed since 1973 have been European laws in the guise of British law. We have a right to freedom within our true law and no Parliament can remove this for they were not present in its implementation nor did it need any Parliament, or any Parliament involvement, this was quite simply a deal struck between the people and a Sovereign, a deal which can never be broken.

The traitors that reside in the Parliament of this country only fear one thing and that quite simply is us the people and they know that they can never defend themselves, or defend their treasonous actions, lies and deceit against the power of the people, asserted by and given by, the founding document of our Constitution Magna Carta 1215. They realize, as many others do, that once the British public grasps the power of Magna Carta in both hands and start to use it in their defense; their game is quite simply up.

What does Magna Carta stand for?

In stands for freedom, that the people have Sovereignty that cannot be removed by anyone and it stands for the only real true rule of law; that no one, without exception, is above the law.

What does Article 61 (Lawful Rebellion) stand for? You have Sovereignty, realize it, and use it."

Taken from here.


The writing isn't mine and I don't agree with every single word, but it's good enough to make the government quake. And if they don't quake, they simply haven't grasped its magnitude. (See what I did there?).

Anyhoo, Art 61 is a vital tool. Use it or don't. Just know that it exists, and know also that you are actually obliged to use it. Assuming that you fully comprehend what treason means, who committed that treason, and that you have a duty to do something about it once you do know. This crime has now been reported at over 80 police stations. Unsurprisingly, they have done nothing. Which makes them guilty of misprision of treason. They are now criminals and we shall not forget that when the day of reckoning dawns.

It constantly amazes me that people do not get into this, body and soul. If we all did this we could take back all the power we need to delete 40 years of crap and get our house in order.

Because let's face it, this shit cannot and must not continue.

Be a hero. Enter Lawful Rebellion today.

Future generations will erect statues in your honour.

CR.

Magna Carta Article 61-Our Last Weapon

This is a powerful weapon. One which none of us should hesitate in using. It may well be our only and last weapon against those usurpers in parliament.

This is from the TPUC (link embedded in the title):

Lawful Rebellion.

Some one recently asked me the question; what is Lawful Rebellion?
Rebellion in itself has a number of different meanings and is in fact quite close to another word that seems to be on everyone’s lips; Revolution. Defined meaning of Rebellion;

1. Refusal to accept some authority or code or convention.
2. An act or show of defiance toward an authority or established government.

Defined meaning of Lawful;

1. Being within the law; allowed by law: lawful methods of dissent. (The lawful refusal to conform to the authority that is unjust)

Under article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 (the founding document of our Constitution) we have a right to enter into lawful rebellion if we feel we are being governed unjustly. Contrary to common belief our Sovereign and her government are only there to govern us and not to rule us and this must be done within the constraint of our Common Law and the freedoms asserted to us by such Law, nothing can become law in this country if it falls outside of this simple constraint.
Article 61 shows quite clearly who really holds the power in this country, that being quite simply us the people; we have Sovereignty not any Parliament and nor can this be taken from us by any Parliament who claim to have taken the people’s Sovereignty. As defined above any act passed by a Parliament to remove the power the people possess, or to remove the power from the point of constraint we invested the power in, is invalid as it falls outside of the constraint laid down by Common/Constitutional Law.
This is a simple safeguard put in place to protect our freedoms under said law and to never allow such freedoms to be removed or diminished. So in reality any Act, Statute and subsequent law or legislation formed by these actions, that effects our freedoms asserted to us, is quite evidently unjust, invalid and most certainly illegal.
By invoking article 61 we are quite clearly stating that we feel we are being governed unjustly and after giving the head of state (Her Majesty) 40 day’s to correct this, if this is not corrected, then we can simply enter into lawful rebellion and we do this under the full protection of our Constitutional Law.
Lawful rebellion allows quite simply for the following recourse;

1. Full refusal to pay any forms of Tax, Fines and any other forms of monies to support and/or benefit said unlawful governance of this country.
2. Full refusal to abide by any Law, Legislation or Statutory Instrument invalidly put in place by said unlawful governance that is in breech of the Constitutional safeguard.
3. To hinder in any way possible all actions of the treasonous government of this land, who have breeched the Constitutional safeguard; defined with no form of violence in anyway, just lawful hindrance under freedom asserted by Constitutional Law and Article 61.

Above are listed the three main ways we can as a people rely upon article 61 and what this allows for. The British people were given over 700 years ago a Law to use as there recourse when faced with either a Parliamentary dictatorship, or a Sovereign trying to rule by Divine Right, which amounts to the same thing. We have a right, and a birth right at that, to be governed properly under our birth right law and no other and certainly not by laws introduced on the pretence of being British Law, when in fact all laws passed since 1973 have been European laws in the guise of British law. We have a right to freedom within our true law and no Parliament can remove this for they were not present in its implementation nor did it need any Parliament, or any Parliament involvement, this was quite simply a deal struck between the people and a Sovereign, a deal which can never be broken.
The traitors that reside in the Parliament of this country only fear one thing and that quite simply is us the people and they know that they can never defend themselves, or defend their treasonous actions, lies and deceit against the power of the people, asserted by and given by, the founding document of our Constitution Magna Carta 1215. They realize, as many others do, that once the British public grasps the power of Magna Carta in both hands and start to use it in their defense; their game is quite simply up.
What does Magna Carta stand for?
In stands for freedom, that the people have Sovereignty that cannot be removed by anyone and it stands for the only real true rule of law; that no one, without exception, is above the law.
What does Article 61 (Lawful Rebellion) stand for? You have Sovereignty, realize it, and use it.

Ready For Rebellion?

I wanted to say a bit more about Lawful Rebellion.

I can fully comprehend why people are reluctant to become Freemen/Freewomen. It is a drastic step to take if you still need the state. Most of us do in one way, shape or form. Take me, for instance. I have chipped in to my state pension scheme for over thirty years. Should I walk away from that? I still pay tax and NIC's, and council tax, so should I not be permitted to call the police, or an ambulance or a fire engine if I need one? Despite having paid the state to educate my children should I now keep them at home?

No, no and no.

I am still entitled to those benefits if I have need of them. I will have a need until the state agrees with my standing as a Freeman and agrees that I will no longer pay all those taxes and then I will make alternative arrangements. So, it is messy being 100% Freeman. We are lashed to the state in many ways. It's a two way street of course, they need us and we need them. Until we find another way, that is.

Is there another way we can demonstrate our displeasure? In a meaningful way that will draw attention to the wrongs committed in our name? Most importantly, is there a risk-free way of doing this?

Yes, yes and yes.

The answer is, of course, Lawful Rebellion. And I know I bang on about this, but this course of action is not political, it is not to dodge parking tickets, it is not even an act of defiance. It is your solemn duty. It is both a right and an obligation rolled into one. This right, and the attending instructions on employing that right are enshrined in Magna Carta 1215 Article 61. MC1215 is still valid. It cannot be repealed, it cannot be deleted. Find the Great Charter (1215 or 1297) and read the relevant articles. This is not some fuzzy little rule to be dug out and waved around willy-nilly. This is deadly serious. Our Monarch has committed treason. She has diluted her power and stated that a foreign government (the EU) has authority over her, and us. She did this by signing the Lisbon Treaty into UK law. This is in direct contravention of the Coronation Oath that she swore on June 2nd, 1953. There is a remedy in law for this. Exercise it. For the good of our nation.

The wording used in the affidavits is somewhat arcane, but it is using the proper form. You can read and download the two affidavits from here.

Are there any risks attached to entering Lawful Rebellion?

How can there be? You are exercising your right under ancient law. One her predecessors agreed to. One that she agreed to. How can you be at risk by carrying out your obligations? The short, and only answer, is that you cannot.

What does Lawful Rebellion do for you?

Look:

Lawful Rebellion allows quite simply for the following recourse;

1. Full refusal to pay any forms of Tax, Fines and any other forms of monies to support and/or benefit said unlawful governance of this country.
2. Full refusal to abide by any Law, Legislation or Statutory Instrument invalidly put in place by said unlawful governance that is in breech of the Constitutional safeguard.
3. To hinder in any way possible all actions of the treasonous government of this land, who have breeched the Constitutional safeguard; defined with no form of violence in any way, just lawful hindrance under freedom asserted by Constitutional Law and Article 61.

(Nicked from here. )

I say this time and time again, and I will say it one more time: Lawful Rebellion is not a way of getting out of debt, or getting out of parking tickets, or a reason to disregard the police, and it certainly does not give you carte blanche to run amok. This is a vitally serious undertaking and you should think hard before committing yourself to this ultimate remedy. You are swearing allegiance to the Baron's Committee which was formed by 65 members of the nobility in 2001, of which four were selected as a quorum to inform the queen that they had entered Lawful Rebellion. Her Maj was given forty days in which to inform the quorum that she was not, in fact, held prisoner by divers persons, and that she would, with all haste, make good on her Oath. She did not do so. Hardly surprising, if she is held captive or has been misinformed and misguided by those evil counsellors. The Barons opened the door, and it is up to those of us who love our nation to follow them through it.

Please read and take on board the information at all three of the links in this piece.


Then, (and I know this is old fashioned), do your duty. Do what is right.

Do what must be done.

And do it with a clear conscience and a happy heart.

No harm will befall you. None at all.

CR.

UPDATE: To see our saviour (MC1215) being used as she ought to be, read this! I sincerely doubt that anyone, anywhere, knows this stuff better than John. Please wish him all the best over at Ian's place.

Land Ahoy!

First, a little bragging, then a recap, a disclaimer, a cut & paste from Lawful Rebellion, and finally, a conclusion.

My blog entry entitled Theft Report was read by many, many thousands of people. This came as a huge surprise to me as my little blog has been bimbling along with a small, but growing band of regular readers. It showed me that we have an awesome weapon in the internet, and if you are lucky enough to be linked to by some of our countries finest bloggers, as I was, then the story spreads fast. I want to thank each and every blogger that pointed people my way. Things have settled down again now but I appear to have picked up around 100 additional regulars. The spike was incredible and you can see it for yourself if you scroll all the way down and click on Sitemeter on the bottom left of this page.

Since we have a sizeable number of newbies, I thought a recap was in order. This will save you reading all my posts since April. Essentially, the story is this: all statutes, Bills, Acts, and statutory instruments are Laws Of The Water. These statutes are not laws, they are given force only if the governed consent to them. ("Consent" is the key word, and you will read it here often). Common Law is the Law Of The Land. Nobody, no government, no administration, not even God himself, can revoke, change, amend, or remove those laws. They are natural laws, they are inherent, and we all know them. Just so that we are all dancing around the same handbag, they are as follows: do not cause, harm, injury or loss to a fellow human, and do not make mischief with your contracts (fraud). Since around 1100 AD many millions of statutes have appeared on the rolls. In just the last 12 years alone we have seen a staggering 3923 new statutes and statutory instruments imposed on Britons.  Thanks to providence, fate, luck or destiny, (call it what you will), I found several sites encouraging people to think hard about who and what they were, and to investigate becoming a Freeman On The Land. I studied the subject for many months, and dived deeper in the law (both statutory and common) than any man ought to. I discovered that almost everything I had been taught was a lie. Not your basic three R's, but just about everything else. More importantly, I discovered that there was a plethora of things that I was NOT taught. The difference between legal and lawful was a revelation in itself. How wealth (more accurately, debt) was created, caused me many sleepless nights. Other websites and fora call it the Grand Deception, and I was shocked and stunned once I dug deeper. Similarities with the movie "The Matrix" were not as exaggerated as I first thought. We really have no clue. We are utterly ignorant, and I was ashamed at how much I didn't know. Having spent time in over 70 countries on our planet, I had considered myself to be well travelled, and as an avid reader of newspapers and magazines, and my ability to do well when answering questions (in my living room) while watching "Millionaire", University Challenge", and "Mastermind" (when it was aired), I thought myself to be reasonably well informed, and, if I'm honest, a bit of a smart-arse. So, with a lot more thinking, and soul searching, I decided to uncouple myself from the matrix and declare myself to be a Freeman. In the 12th century, a Freeman was important. He wasn't beholden to anyone for anything, he had risen above serfdom, and could roam the land free and clear. He could, in short, come and go as he pleased. I wanted some of that. So, using what some would describe as arcane and ancient law, I stepped back onto the land on 15th June 2009. Apart from the sense of freedom I felt, and it was tremendous, it didn't mean much to the machine of government. In point of fact, it means worlds to them. It frightens them, and rightfully so. Everything Freemen do is honourable, and, just as importantly, it is lawful. Which means that there is nothing they can do to stop me. Nothing whatsoever. In reality, what they do is ignore me. To ignore sworn affidavits is dishonourable. These words may not mean much to the readers of this blog, but in the world of law, like so many other words, they take on a whole new meaning. Remaining honourable is paramount. I am now a Freeman, and I am determined to remain on the land as much as I possibly can until I take my last breath. Because I am a Freeman, and I have a choice, I will step into Commerce when it suits me to do so. This is not hypocrisy, this is free will. I am merely exercising my freedom to choose. I am routinely accused, falsely, of being a freeloader, or worse, an anarchist. Neither are true, and if you take a close look at libertarianism, you will find that if I deserve a label, it is that I am a libertarian.

Belated edit: I should have explained that we live in two different worlds. In one world, we are known as the people we are. We are human beings, and we think, we feel, we see, we hear, we eat, we sleep and we dream. In the other world we are a fiction. We are Strawmen and legally, we are fictional. Strawmen do not see because they have no eyes. Strawmen do not hear because they have no ears. Strawmen cannot sign papers because they have no arms, hands, or a brain to direct them. We assume that we are one and the same, but we are not. Freemen make the distinction by divorcing themselves from their Strawmen or their legal fictions. The Controllers do not like this. They cannot deal with sentient beings, only faceless companies and/or soulless corporations, which is exactly what our Strawman represents.

The disclaimer. I do not profess to be an expert, I am not a lawyer, and I am not giving advice. I am merely pointing you towards one version of the truth that exists in my new world. This route is not for everyone, and it certainly should not be followed without some serious thought and complete understanding. If you are in any doubt at all, the thing to do is to stop, learn a little more, and at all times proceed with extreme caution. If you make a mistake, or do not fully comprehend what you are doing, chaos awaits. Tread carefully, and all will be well.

This is a new path. It was always there but it was cleverly hidden in plain sight. Recently I have been discussing the "movement" with the people over at Lawful Rebellion and they offer, freely, some fantastic explanations, and, if you want them, some guidelines to follow. What follows is a new form of affidavit, and it contains a power the like of which you will rarely come across. In effect, you enter into a lawfully binding agreement with Gordon Brown, and when he is ousted, as he surely must be, with his successors. I urge you to visit the site, and read it in toto, but before you head over there, read this:

"Folks, Affidavits work because in law, they override everything else that comes before them. Affidavits offer the Facts, Harmony and maybe more importantly when it comes to law, the Agreement of the parties. Whilst of course the legal world offers only lies and falsehoods".

Your completed affidavit will contain information like this:

1. The Affiant is a private, living and sentient man.
2. The Affiant is not a UNITED KINGDOM “citizen,” “subject,” “vessel” or “person” or any ens legis artificial entity, procedural phantom, legal fiction or juristic personality within the UNITED KINGDOM.
3. Affiant is foreign to and without the UNITED KINGDOM.
4. Any party that would order, represent or persuade the Affiant to falsely present the Affiant as a UNITED KINGDOM citizen, vessel or person directly or by deception, device, misnomer, mistaken identity, warrant or indictment, real or imagined, would be engaging in Enticement to Slavery.
5. Any party that alleges a liability against the Affiant is obligated to produce an Affidavit of Liability to demonstrate such liability.
6. The Affiant is not liable to or for any Government statutes, rules and/or codes, including, without limitation, UNITED KINGDOM Codes and statutes and/or codes of any of Respondents’ political subdivisions.
7. A legal fiction corporation cannot secure in personam jurisdiction over or against Affiant, a living man, without Affiant’s voluntary election to submit.
8. The Affiant’s use of a notary public, Bank of England Promissory Notes, and/or any other public facilities, when alternatives are generally unavailable, does not comprise Affiant’s submission to any political jurisdiction, the creation of an adhesion contract expressly or tacitly with the UNITED KINGDOM and/or any other party real or imagined, or an appearance before any body or tribunal, administrative or judicial, real or imagined.
9. It would be both a violation of law and a violation of the Affiant’s God given unalienable rights if any government/corporative agent, officer or employee attempts to, or does in-fact, force, coerce, manipulate and/or deceive the Affiant into receiving any form of medical treatment at anytime whatsoever, including but not limited to vaccinations.
10. All words herein are as Affiant defines them.

Your completed affidavit will look different as you will have added your autograph and had it attested to by a Notary Public.


In conclusion, for now, I would ask that you ponder these things:

If you are happy to continue forking over between 50-80% of your hard earned money to the government, lawful rebellion is not for you.

If you are satisfied that the courts offer justice, lawful rebellion is not for you.

If you have no desire to learn the difference between lawful and legal, lawful rebellion is not for you.

If you are convinced that banks and bankers merely lubricate, but do not lie, plot and scheme, lawful rebellion is not for you.

If you think that your government sees you as anything other than a cash cow, lawful rebellion is not for you.

If you are happy to be spied upon, tagged, vaccinated, milked, and controlled to the Nth degree, lawful rebellion is not for you.

If you are absolutely sure that your government or the judiciary tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, then lawful rebellion is definitely not for you.

For the others amongst us that feel that lawful rebellion is a viable, if not the only option, then hie yourselves over to the site embedded in the title.

It may be the smartest thing you ever did.

CR.

What's The Difference....

...between Lawful Rebellion and the Freeman Concept?

Thank you Anon, for asking the question in my earlier post.

Some people assume they are one and the same, but my research indicates that whilst they may be related, they are quite different. You can, for instance, serve notice on the government that you are now a Freeman On The Land, as I have done, or, you can serve notice on HM Queen Elizabeth II that you have entered into Lawful Rebellion. Or, you can do both. For the time being I am happy to be a Freeman, and I am considering Lawful Rebellion (LR). Incidentally, you can get more details on LR by clicking on my title, above.

Lawful Rebellion

You will have learnt, if you went to the linked site first, this:

"The United Kingdom Government has, over the last one hundred years, conspired to become a treasonous assembly and Parliamentary dictatorship. Parliament has acted with malice towards the English people. It makes unlawful Statute for the purpose of giving life to its treason – and to suppress dissent. The members of this wretched assembly are oath breakers. Parliament has betrayed those English people who have given their lives to defend this sovereign Community of England. This is The Great Treason".

LR distances you from the state and from the Queen. For people to consider this as a means of drawing attention to the treason that abounds in the UK at present, speaks volumes. This is not a small step to take. It requires one to search his or her conscience and make a tough decision, swiftly followed by decisive action.

If you want to look at LR more closely, simply type "Lawful Rebellion" into your searchbar and see what comes up. I got just over half a million hits so there is plenty of material to beef up on.

I noticed this quote on the website:

"The English law existed not to control the individual but to free him. It was on the side of the subject against those – whether usurping politicians or common criminals – who wished to bend him unconsenting to their will".
Roger Scruton in ‘England – an Elegy’




And it ties in nicely with the Freeman Movement.

Freeman On The Land

It sounds a little arcane, and ones mind is immediately drawn to medieval times. (Well, mine was when I first discovered the movement). Squires, knights, barons and lords, jugs of ale and maids-a-milking, summer sunshine and much happiness. (The reality was much more miserable, I am sure). This is far, far more than a romantic notion. Becoming a Freeman involves actively removing yourself from those statute laws that either make no sense at all, or are superfluous, (superfluous covers most of them), and taking an oath to abide by common law, or Natural Law. As I have said in the past, (and will repeat often), Statutes are Laws of The Water. Think Admiralty Law, think Fleet Law, think Commerce Law. All were written for the high seas, in those dim and distant days when trading between nations was paramount to an island-bound peoples survival. The statutes were written to ensure fair contracts between all parties, and provided a remedy if those contracts were reneged upon. These statutes, millions of them, apply to the sea. I do not live in or on the sea. I live on terra firma. Common Law offers me a remedy. It offers me a lawful way out. Having given the Home Office time to rebut my claims, I am now in possession of an extremely powerful document. It is not anarchy, it is not my "ticket to the sweet life", and it most certainly does not mean I can shirk my responsibilities as a husband, father, citizen or employee. Having sworn an oath not to hurt or cheat any other human beings, I find that I am more aware of those around me than I ever was before. I have rediscovered a long forgotten word: honour. In law, the words honour and dishonour are powerful juju. To be in dishonour is to be all the way wrong. To be honourable in one's dealings with fellow humans is regarded as the very apex of good behaviour. As long as you are honourable, you cannot go wrong.

We have a dishonourable government. We have a dishonourable monarch. Both care only for themselves. This is not their raison detre.

Politicians are there to protect us and serve us. They do not. They strip us of our freedoms daily. They are craven and weak. They are greedy and immoral. Declaring myself to be a Freeman divorces me from them. How many of you people reading this can disagree with my actions? How many of you hanker to do the same? I hope it is all of you. Do this thing, and the anger, the rage, the impotency, and the feeling of helplessness simply fades away. It is a fantastic way to feel.

And Queeny? She appears to be a caring lady and I cannot honestly say what goes through her mind day to day. We have never met and I feel ill-equipped to judge her. What I do know, however, is that she has done fuck all while those gibbons in Westminster gave our country over to Europe, slice by painful slice. That makes her negligent in my book. That ticks all the "treason" boxes, and it cannot, it must not continue.

We are deceived daily, even hourly, by those we trust to rule or govern us.

If, by declaring myself divorced from them, and by creating a little chaos to disrupt this Grand Deception, I can effect even a tiny difference to my life, and to the lives of others, it will be well worth the effort.

The alternative is terrifying.

It's like knowing there is a land-mine in your path and continuing to walk towards it. More, it's like ensuring that you are going to plant your right foot down on the trip-switch.

I realise this means nothing to you, dear reader, but now that I know where the mines are, I am going to side-step them all. The beauty of it is this: I have done this lawfully, and we both know that. So there is absolutely nothing they can do about it.

I'm in this now. Balls deep. It may end badly for me, but at least I am in charge.

I am living like a lion, not a sheep.

At last.

Why I Entered Into Lawful Rebellion-A Reminder

This is really for new readers of my blog.

 

Just over a year ago, when I started down this rocky and risky road, I was lucky enough to attract the attention of 161 souls in my first month. I now consider myself to be extremely fortunate because over 9,000 of you return, month after month, to read my stuff. (I know, I know, it isn't always my stuff).

 

I do not do this because I dislike HM Queen. I do not do this with any sense of disloyalty to our monarch. I do this because I am obligated to. Entering into Lawful Rebellion is the only right thing to do in the present  circumstances. I do not do this lightly. I thought long and hard before taking action. So have many thousands of others.

 

Our numbers will grow. And grow. And grow. Join us if you can.

 

The following is from the British Constitution Group:

 

"We, the British People have a right to govern ourselves. That right has been subjugated as a consequence of acts of treason having been committed by the collective political establishment, aided and abetted by corrupt segments of the judiciary, the police, the Church and the civil service.
Furthermore, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, whose position has been usurped by a corrupt House of Commons and who has been forced into the destruction of her Kingdom and the breaking of her coronation oath, no longer governs us in accordance with our laws and customs, as was the situation when she was elected by the people as our Sovereign and our Head of State.

Why Her Majesty has failed in her duty is not for us to judge at this point in time - Her Majesty has however been made aware of the situation and is now duty bound to make amends.

A political elite has for some time manipulated the electoral system to deprive the people of true democratic representation by constructing a party political system that has allowed, indeed encouraged, acts of treason to have been committed.

As a direct consequence of the betrayal of the British people by the collective political establishment, and others, the British Constitution Group is calling for Lawful Rebellion, as is our right under article 61 Magna Carta 1215.

Too many politicians pay lip-service to the principles of democracy whilst serving the interests of self and party, which has allowed patronage, greed and corruption to infect our system of governance to levels beyond anything that could be imagined or accepted by the British people. Whereas the British people have expected that the good elements within our system of governance would control and rein in the bad, it is now perfectly clear that rather than expose corruption and greed, the good elements have themselves become infected and corrupt.

Such is the state of our governance today and thus our nation, that we (the people) feel we have no choice but to seek redress by way of lawful rebellion… with which we will continue until such times as our system of governance is put right, our sovereignty is reinstated, our rights respected and the rule of law upheld… and those who have brought about our demise through their criminal activity be brought to justice in an honest court, with harshest treatment for those found guilty of these crimes committed henceforth.

Furthermore, we are aware of dark hands that operate behind the scenes of government, controlling individual politicians and the government itself and we know too well that many decisions have been made to serve these interests, at the expense of the people.

We are no longer prepared to tolerate the subjugation of our rights to satisfy the demands of the shadowy elite of the supranational and criminal banking cartel.

We are no longer prepared to tolerate the lies, deceit and shady practices of politicians that are the hallmarks of corrupt governance around the world.

We are no longer prepared to accept a compliant and colluding media that has been complicit in the aforementioned criminal acts by a lax and pathetic coverage of vital issues.

The collective political establishment has for the past four decades conspired to transfer our national sovereignty into the hands of foreign governance, without our consent and against the rule of law.
 
We are demanding that our sovereignty be reinstated, our rights be respected and the rule of law upheld.

It is beholden upon every individual, politicians in particular, to now carefully consider their positions and the decisions they make henceforth – because we (the people) will judge them accordingly.

We ask those amongst us who understand the gravity of the situation to stand up and defend our national sovereignty.
 
If you agree with us, we ask that you join us in Lawful Rebellion."

I did exactly that. I was proud to do so at the time.

I still am.

CR.

Lawful Rebellion

First, a couple of caveats, then I will explain what this is all about.

1. I am not a lawyer. I am not giving legal advice.

2. To verify this information, seek out a lawyer who fully understands Common Law. This will be harder to achieve than you would suppose. The reasons for this become obvious once you have read the material.

3. I am merely pointing out the road, I am not instructing you to take it.

4. For further information, click on the title of this blog post and it will take you to people that understand this. When you get there, follow all embedded links to round out your understanding.

5. Allow several hours for this. When you have read and understood it all, you will realise that it is probably the most productive several hours of your life.

6. Ensure you at least look over the previous entry entitled Magna Carta.

Ready? This is the wake-up call to end all wake-up calls. The saddest thing of all is that it was here all along, our salvation, our escape from the madness that is modern, corrupt Britain, and we were never told about it. That is a crime in and of itself.

Common Law is the Law-Of-The-Land. For everything that follows, you need to keep that fact uppermost in your mind.

Essentially, there are only three things to bear in mind regarding Common Law. These three things govern our daily lives.

a) Do not hurt anyone
b) Do not steal anything
c) Do not defraud anyone

Using just these three laws, we can lead safe, free lives.

Statutes are enacted by our government. They like Statutes. They have bombarded us with over 3,600 of them in the last 11 years. Since Magna Carta was signed, around 60 million Statutes have been enacted.

Statutes are the Law-Of-The-Sea.

All of those Statutes that were written to apply to the Sea, the High Seas, or the Waters, are fine.

The rest, are not.

They are worthless because we, the people, did not consent to them. If we did not consent to them, we are not required to obey them.

As you will see when you follow the link, the simplicity of this is shocking, and it is wide-ranging. It has, in short, the ability to bring down our current, or future governments if they are not doing our bidding. By not listening to us, any government is in peril. Our redress is Lawful Rebellion.

Lawful Rebellion, in modern terms, is our Opt Out Clause. I will be Opting Out later this week when I have prepared my Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right.

This government has signed the Lisbon Treaty. In collusion with our Monarch, they are guilty of Treason. This is what Magna Carta says, and when/if we enter Europe fully, it is all threatened:

1) Trial by Jury as an essential right.

2) Everyone engaged in applying the law must know the law, and be minded to observe it well.

3) Property can only ever be seized on the basis of a verdict from a court of law.

4) Trivial offences can be dealt with based on "the oaths of good men in the neighbourhood".

5) No-one can be placed on trial based solely on their own unsupported confession.

6) The right to justice can never be removed, cannot be sold, nor can it be delayed. In summary: You have the right to know what you are charged with, the right to defend yourself, and the right to your day in court.

7) The right to petition the Monarch and allow 40 days for any grievance to be settled. The right to enter into a state of lawful rebellion if that grievance still remains after this period. In the state of lawful rebellion to be able to seize the Monarch's property and to throw every spanner in the works necessary to have the grievance resolved (apart from harm, injury, etc. In other words simple non-co-operation in every respect). And the right to encourage any others to help in this respect. To hand back any seized property once the dispute has been settled.

Common Law says that we are innocent until proven guilty. Most European laws presume guilt.

I cannot emphasise the scale of this threat enough. We need to escape the clutches of Europe or everything we hold dear, even these most fundamental rights, will be lost.

A common myth is that we cannot pick and choose the laws we like and discard the ones we don't. You will be shocked and pleasantly surprised to learn that we have exactly that right. As we have discovered, Statutes (Laws-Of-The-Sea) are a) enacted without our consent and b) do not apply on dry land. Put simply, you can create your own set of laws to live by. The first step is to Claim your Right. This is done by declaring yourself to be a Freeman-On-The-Land. You set down your laws, send it to the Home Office, or your local Chief Constable, (or no-one at all, you can produce it when/if you end up in court and use it to walk out of the door smiling, assuming you have not broken any Common Laws, Laws-Of-The-Land) and it is all completely and utterly lawful, once you have worked out and rectified any objections. There is an example shown in the link. The list of laws you want to live by are wholly customisable.

Don't want to pay tax? Then don't. The link explains how, and why it doesn't matter.

Don't want to pay a speeding ticket, or a parking fine? Then don't. The link explains how.

Don't want to obey or recognise any one (or all) of those Statutes (Laws-Of-The-Sea)? Then don't. The link explains how.

Enough from me.

Go. Read. Be amazed. Change your Life. Set your Self free.

Or don't.

The choice is yours.

One Million Patriots Wanted-Urgently

Your country needs you.

Now, more than ever.

This may strike you as dramatic, or insane "advice". It is neither. Our monarch is all the way wrong. Our parliament has zero legitimacy. None whatsoever. It hasn't for almost 100 years. Every statute they shat out is meaningless. Every time Queenie (or more accurately, her "cousins") gave Royal Assent they sank a little deeper, and they damaged us further.They schemed and they colluded and they gave our country away. The queen swore an Oath not to give powers to "foreign usurpers" and she has broken that Oath many, many times. It is our task to remind her.  The simple choice is to do nothing. The simple choice is to wait, and assume someone else will fix everything. We will be waiting until hell freezes over.

Lawful Rebellion is no longer a choice for "loonies". Lawful Rebellion is not (nor ever has been) the preserve of the tin-foil hatters.

Lawful Rebellion is an obligation. It is a duty. There is no choice.

Watch the first seven minutes of the video above, and listen as Roger Hayes tells us why. Watch the rest by all means, but if you aren't convinced in the first six or seven minutes then snuggle back down under the duvet. Lawful Rebellion is not for you. It is not for sheep. It is not for the unthinking.

This course of action is for lions. It is for those among us who demand justice. Having folded my arms across my chest, stared them in the eye and said, "No", (and still lived!), I can tell you that there is nothing more liberating. And when you have said it once, you will want to say it again and again and again. You have all the power in the world. You will discover this when you learn to say "No".

If you want your country back, this is the only way. The right way. The lawful way.

Do it today. Do it now.

Do it not, and your childrens children may just wonder what you were made of.

I don't know about you, but I want mine to be proud. I want mine to know that I fought to put things right.

It's your call. Just as it ever was.

CR.

The British Constitution Group

Talking time is over. No more bleating. Time for action. One million good men and women are needed to enter Lawful Rebellion. It's painless, and it is liberating. Your children, their children, and their children,  will be eternally grateful that you woke up in time and did something fantastic. Read this. Then sign the pledge. You owe it to yourself. You owe it to everyone you hold dear. You owe it to Britains future.

Like me, you probably assumed someone else would step up. You thought that a hero, a great leader would emerge to save the day. That hero, dear reader, is YOU. 

Only YOU can make a difference because no-one else cares enough to tear themselves away from the telly box in the corner of the living room. They are lost. They are brainwashed. They accept every draconian change because, mostly, it doesn't affect them. They have no notion of the "boiling frog" exercise. They do not know that they are the frog.  The water temperature is rising. It is up to us bloggers to hit the off switch, climb out of the pan and tell the politicians, in a way they have never been told before, enough! It stops now. And it stops because of us.

I don't ask for much, just a few comments now and then. And you (thankfully) obliged. I would never consider begging. I do so now without any embarrassment or shame. The clock is ticking ever faster, and our country is being given away without a whimper. Without even the barest protest. I am begging you to rise up. Let the slumbering giant awake and vent his retribution. Peacefully, but forcefully and unequivocally. Let us, and our friends, regain control.

The time is now. YOUR time is now. Make history. Your ancestors will be so proud. They will talk about us for eons. History will show that our resistance was key. History will boast that we cared for our nation and that we rose up to defend her when she needed us most. Our nation, our way of life, our very existence as Brits is in harms way. Let's do all we can do neutralise the threat. It is a matter of honour.

Our country needs us. Badly.

Read this. Then react. Then tell everyone you know to do the same.

Declaration By The British Constitution Group

We, the British People have a right to govern ourselves. That right has been subjugated as a consequence of acts of treason having been committed by the collective political establishment, aided and abetted by corrupt segments of the judiciary, the police, the Church and the civil service.
Furthermore, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, whose position has been usurped by a corrupt House of Commons and who has been forced into the destruction of her Kingdom and the breaking of her coronation oath, no longer governs us in accordance with our laws and customs, as was the situation when she was elected by the people as our Sovereign and our Head of State.
Why Her Majesty has failed in her duty is not for us to judge at this point in time - Her Majesty has however been made aware of the situation and is now duty bound to make amends.
A political elite has for some time manipulated the electoral system to deprive the people of true democratic representation by constructing a party political system that has allowed, indeed encouraged, acts of treason to have been committed.
As a direct consequence of the betrayal of the British people by the collective political establishment, and others, the British Constitution Group is calling for Lawful Rebellion, as is our right under article 61 Magna Carta 1215.
Too many politicians pay lip-service to the principles of democracy whilst serving the interests of self and party, which has allowed patronage, greed and corruption to infect our system of governance to levels beyond anything that could be imagined or accepted by the British people. Whereas the British people have expected that the good elements within our system of governance would control and rein in the bad, it is now perfectly clear that rather than expose corruption and greed, the good elements have themselves become infected and corrupt.
Such is the state of our governance today and thus our nation, that we (the people) feel we have no choice but to seek redress by way of lawful rebellion… with which we will continue until such times as our system of governance is put right, our sovereignty is reinstated, our rights respected and the rule of law upheld… and those who have brought about our demise through their criminal activity be brought to justice in an honest court, with harshest treatment for those found guilty of these crimes committed henceforth.
Furthermore, we are aware of dark hands that operate behind the scenes of government, controlling individual politicians and the government itself and we know too well that many decisions have been made to serve these interests, at the expense of the people.
We are no longer prepared to tolerate the subjugation of our rights to satisfy the demands of the shadowy elite of the supranational and criminal banking cartel.
We are no longer prepared to tolerate the lies, deceit and shady practices of politicians that are the hallmarks of corrupt governance around the world.
We are no longer prepared to accept a compliant and colluding media that has been complicit in the aforementioned criminal acts by a lax and pathetic coverage of vital issues.
The collective political establishment has for the past four decades conspired to transfer our national sovereignty into the hands of foreign governance, without our consent and against the rule of law.
We are demanding that our sovereignty be reinstated, our rights be respected and the rule of law upheld.
It is beholden upon every individual, politicians in particular, to now carefully consider their positions and the decisions they make henceforth – because we (the people) will judge them accordingly.
We ask those amongst us who understand the gravity of the situation to stand up and defend our national sovereignty.
If you agree with us, we ask that you sign up to Lawful Rebellion and pledge as follows.
The Pledge: -

1. To boycott the main political parties until our sovereignty has been reinstated, our rights respected and the rule of law obeyed. (We encourage British citizens to vote for any candidate who will endorse our right to self-governance, but question the integrity of any MP or candidate who claims to do so whilst remaining a member of a political party not so-committed.)
2. To renounce EU citizenship and reject entirely any constitution but our own.
3. To acknowledge that Royal Assent is the exclusive property of the people, held in trust and used by the Monarch in defence of the peoples liberty.
4. To declare loyalty to our Constitution and uphold same.
5. To give support to the cause of the reinstatement of our national sovereignty by way of a contribution. (Why?)-See pledge at BCG Group site embedded in the title of this post.
   

To Whom It May Concern-Census 2011

I will not be completing your forms.

I am not required to. I am in Lawful Rebellion and your statutes are meaningless to me. Besides which, my job is to hinder your government at every opportunity. This is not a lifestyle choice: this is my duty, my obligation, as a Briton. My instructions, taken directly from Article 61 of the Magna Carta treaty of 1215, still valid & still lawful, are as follows:

“together with the community of the whole realm, distrain and distress us in all possible ways, namely, by seizing our castles, lands, possessions, and in any other way they can, until redress has been obtained as they see fit…”

Crystal clear, those instructions. I take them very seriously. Be it known now, that I have revoked my allegiance to Elizabeth Windsor, and I have sworn it instead to the Barons Committee formed in 2001.

Look:

Magna Carta 1215, article 61

OATH TO THE LORDS

I, Captain Ranty, of XX XXXXX XX, XXXXXshire near[ postcode], in full knowledge of treason being committed in parliament by delivering the sovereign peoples of this common law land into the hands of foreign powers; in understanding of some wrongs done by the present holder of the Office of Sovereign, from whom I now transfer my allegiance, do willingly and wholeheartedly enter into lawful rebellion, and I solemnly swear upon my oath to obey the Lords in accordance with article 61 of the Magna Carta until such times as redress of these present wrongs is achieved.

Sworn and subscribed on this the 4^th day of March, in the year of our Lord two thousand and eleven.

My mark

_____________________________

Four affidavits are now lodged with Elizabeth Windsor, three affidavits are lodged with David Cameron dba First Lord of the Treasury, and one affidavit is lodged with the Home Office. None of my affidavits have been rebutted. All now stand as truth in law. I have Lawful Excuse. Send your drones if you must, but they will get the same answer. Invite me to court if you must, but I tell you now, I have already won.


For those who have not yet entered Lawful Rebellion, I strongly advise you to send the following notice to Jil Matheson of the ONS. If they can ask questions of you, guess what? You are fully entitled, under law, to ask questions of your own. If you get satisfactory answers to the questions below, by all means, fill in their forms and send them off.

My thanks to Dave: Murphy for the template.

Or you can use the instructions here, or here, or here or here.

Here you go:

TO: Office for National Statistics Government Buildings Cardiff Road Newport South Wales NP10 8XG

In care of: House/Number, STREET, TOWN, COUNTY Near: [POSTCODE]

Date: 27^th March 2011

Re: Census Form

NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE AND REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION

You are hereby put on notice.

Dear Ms. Jil Matheson, or to whom it may concern,

You are receiving this notice in response to the Census form which was addressed to “The Occupier”.

Originally, the census was instigated as a simple numerical count of the population; however, the information required in this census far exceeds this mandate.

The census form in question will be completed and returned subject to receipt of full clarification of the points and questions contained in this notice. This is therefore a conditional agreement. This removes controversy and means that you no longer have any ultimate recourse to a court of law in this matter because there is no controversy upon which it could adjudicate.

For this reason it is important that you consider and respond to this notice and respond in substance, which means actually addressing the points raised herein. The ‘nearest official form’ will not suffice, and consequently is likely to be ignored without dishonour.

Notice to one is notice to all. Should you not be in a position to respond with clarity to the points stated herein, a suitable officer or official must be delegated to fulfil these requirements.

On the other hand there is a time-limit on the agreement being offered. It is reasonable, and if it runs out then you and all associated parties are in default, removing any and all lawful excuse on your part for proceeding in this matter

You have apparently made demands upon ‘The Occupier’. Those demands are not understood and cannot therefore be lawfully fulfilled. Clarification of your document is therefore required so that I or ‘The Occupier’ may act accordingly. Failure to accept this offer to clarify and to do so completely and in good faith within 7 (seven) days will be deemed by all parties to mean you and your principal or other parties abandon all demands upon me or ‘The Occupier’.

Please answer and clarify the following points and questions in full with proof of all claims made:

1. What law requires me to complete the census?
2. From where does the Office for National Statistics derive the lawful authority to demand private information?
3. Is there a limit to invasion of privacy?
4. Is the Office for National Statistics lawfully authorised to demand Private property?
5. How can we lawfully be penalised for failure to provide information?
6. By what authority does the Census collector threaten penalties for failure to provide personal information?
7. Are there any circumstances whereby security agencies may access census information as suggested by section 39, subsection 4 of the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007?
8. Since Census data is being requested under pain of law enforcement and threat of financial hardship, are people able to decline answering, so as not to risk incriminating themselves, as authorised, for example, by the Data Protection Act?
9. Because government search and seizure of private information is prohibited without a court warrant based on probable cause, current Census policies violate that right do they not?
10. As the public have not been consulted on the Census, please explain how this demand for private information is ‘Democratic’.

11.  Please confirm or deny that any demand through correspondence such as the census form sent to “The Occupier” has any basis for legal status or legitimacy.

12.  The Census form states “The householder is responsible for ensuring that this questionnaire is completed and returned" – please provide details of the legal definition upon which the ONS depends in defining “the householder”

13.  Does the Census refer to the “sentient, physical, human being” or the “Legal Fiction/Person” as identified by Birth Certificates, Passports, and other legal documents which have no legal bearing on the sentient, physical, human being?

14.  Does the Office for National Statistics expect the sentient human being to complete this Census on behalf of the human being themselves or on behalf of the various paper documents, known as the Legal Fiction/Person, which they represent?

15.  Please provide proof of claim that I am a member of the society whose statutes and subsisting regulations you are enforcing.

16.  Please provide proof of claim that there is a nameable society that I belong to and that the laws covered within any alleged transgressions state that they apply to me within that named society.

17. Please confirm or deny that the census data will not be used directly or indirectly for the service of shareholders in any of the corporations involved in the running of Government Services.

18.  Please confirm or deny that the provided information will be used to form profit-making strategies and policies that will affect well-being?

19.  Since every government database has been hacked, leaked, lost or compromised in some fashion, how exactly can the Office for National Statistics claim data security and protection of the information with any confidence?

20.  Does the Office for National Statistics take full responsibility for any mishandled or miss-processed data, or loss of data, or unauthorised accessing of that data by 3rd parties?

21.  How would the Office for National Statistics locate, protect and compensate those individuals whose data becomes compromised?

22.  What evidence do you have that I am a United Kingdom Resident?

23.  Please confirm or deny that the spiralling cost estimate of almost £500million spent at a time of national austerity is considered by the ONS to be wholly justifiable and appropriate.

24.  Please confirm or deny that the expenditure of £4.5million of tax-payers money in order to “advertise” the census is wholly appropriate and necessary at a time of national austerity.

25.  Please confirm or deny that the Cabinet minister responsible for the census, Francis Maude, more or less admits that this census is unnecessary in this day and age and that the census is going ahead despite the government’s tacit admittance that it is a waste of money and time.

26.  Please confirm or deny that the ONS spent nearly £70,000 on reviewing whether the census form should include a “tick box” for those of Kashmiri ethnicity and that such a tick box was rejected due to “little interest” and that the resulting expenditure constitutes a complete waste of tax-payers money.

27.  Please confirm or deny that the ONS is spending in the region of £25,000 per week or approximately £9.5million over a ten month period on community advisors to “encourage” participation in the census and please confirm or deny that the ONS considers that this constitutes a wholly justifiable and appropriate expenditure of tax-payers money.

28.  Please confirm or deny that the ONS are, through these advisors, hoping to encourage participation in the census through dialogue with members of community and representative organisations in order to “engage” the communities represented by those organisations and that the encouragement through engagement is unnecessary as the ONS claims that participation in the census is mandatory and that a response is “required by law” and please also confirm or deny that in engaging communities in this fashion that the ONS are guilty of discrimination against communities who do not have such “representative organisations” through which to engage.

29.  Please confirm or deny that the census data will be handled by an American Arms Manufacturer Lockheed Martin.

30.  Please confirm or deny that Lockheed Martin have in the past been charged with illegally spying on UK citizens.

31.  Please confirm or deny that Lockheed Martin works with the CIA and FBI and that they have a lengthy record of crimes against humanity.

32.  Please confirm or deny that while it may be illegal for UK intelligence agencies to spy on the population without a warrant that it is not illegal for US intelligence services to spy on the UK population with such a warrant.

33.  Given their track record for such actions please confirm or deny that Lockheed Martin have not in the case of the census consultancy paid bribes to individuals in order to secure the contract.

34.  It is suggested that Lockheed Martin have no moral fibre, social conscience or scruples and it is further suggested that they are one of the most disreputable companies in the world – please confirm or deny this.

35.  It is suggested that thousands of law suits have been filed against Lockheed Martin for everything from racial discrimination to fraud.  If this were the case, it would prevent them from fulfilling their contract with the ONS – Please confirm or deny this.

36.  It is reported that Lockheed Martin have “lobbied” for the illegal war in Iraq and that they have been the main arms suppliers to the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine thus making them responsible for the deaths of millions of human beings – Please confirm or deny this.

37.  Please confirm or deny that personal details collected in your census will be processed in a plant run by an American firm, staff of which were prosecuted for stealing student loan records of US President Obama.

38.  In a news report published by the Mail on Sunday shows that the company UK Data Capture Limited named as the sub-contractor in charge of processing census information is jointly owned by the examination board Edexcel and US-owned firm Vangent which are both regarded as having “patchy” records for data handling – Please confirm or deny this.

39.  Please confirm or deny that Edexcel was criticised by in 2002 by then Prime Minister Blair for a series of errors when he described the company as “sloppy” and “unacceptable”.

40.  Please confirm or deny that the Office for National Statistics considers these companies as acceptable agents for the handling of private statistical information of the British people.

41.  Please confirm or deny that the personal data collected by your census will not be sold, given, loaned or in any other way disseminated to companies offering online “directory” services such as 192.com or hard copy based directory services such as Yellow Pages or Thomson Local or any similar or associated organisations.

42.  Please confirm or deny that all U.S. companies are subject to the Patriot Act which allows the U.S. Government full access to any data in that company’s possession.

43.  It is claimed that only staff who work for the ONS will have access to the “full census dataset”; please confirm or deny that it would not be possible for several members of ONS staff (each having access to separate datasets) might not collude in order to collect together a full dataset of information in contravention to the security measures supposedly put in place.

44.  In a Press Briefing dated 14 January 2011 it is stated that “additional contractual and operation safeguards” have been put in place to address concerns about the possibility of the US Patriot Act being used by US intelligence services to gain access to data – please list these contractual and operational safeguards.

45.  In a Press Briefing dated 14 January 2011 it is stated that only UK/EU owned companies will have access to personal census data – please confirm or deny that there may be UK/EU companies that are subsidiaries of US corporations that may circumnavigate the assurances provided by the Office for National Statistics and the contract between Lockheed Martin UK and so allow access to personal census data under the US Patriot Act.

46.  In a Press Briefing dated 14 January 2011 it is stated that independent checks by an “accredited UK security consultancy” of both physical and electronic security are carried out for ONS – please provide;

a)      the name of the accredited UK security consultancy;

b)      provide references that confirm their accreditation as well as;

c)      details of the body with whom they are accredited.

47.  In a Press Briefing dated 14 January 2011 it is stated that 1,500 jobs have been “created” by the award of the contract to Lockheed Martin UK.  Please provide details of;

a)      how many of these jobs will exist on completion of the contract;

b)      what percentage of these jobs have been given to the long-term unemployed;

c)      what percentage of these jobs have been given to disabled people and,

d)      what percentage of these jobs are given to other than UK citizens and,

e)      what checks were made to ensure that they have the right to work in the UK (e.g. a Passport, a Visa or work permit for non-nationals).

48.  In a Press Briefing dated 14 January 2011 it is stated that 1,500 jobs have been “created” by the award of the contract to Lockheed Martin UK.  Please provide details of;

a)      the training that has been provided to these 1,500 new employees to ensure that security measures are understood and met;

b)      the rights that employees have to request time off for study or training, i.e. ‘time to train’;

49.  In a Press Briefing dated 14 January 2011 it is stated “the contract has created around 1,500 jobs in the UK”.  Please provide details of:

a)      what background checks have been carried out to ensure compliance with rules governing “security related jobs”;

b)      details of the equal opportunities policies pertaining to the pre-employment checks as required by Employment law;

c)      details of the rights and benefits of those being employed for the duration of the contract; and

d)      the details of any severance package applicable to those staff who will lose their job at the end of the contract;

e)      the rights offered to staff under the “flexible working rule”;

f)       if flexible working includes the provision to “work from home”, what additional safeguards are in place to ensure the integrity and security of the personal census data under such circumstances;

g)      the benefits offered to staff for maternity and paternity leave during the course of the contract;

h)      confirmation or denial that the ONS conform to the “working time limit” requirements under Employment Law;

i)        confirm under what conditions a contract of employment may be changed;

1. agreement between the ONS and the employee,
2. collective agreement, or
3. by implication.

50.  In a Press Briefing dated 14 January 2011 it is stated that the contract was awarded by ONS to Lockheed Martin UK as it “offered the best value for money” in an “open procurement scheme” carried out “under European Law”.  Please provide,

a)      details of how Lockheed Martin UK offered the best value for money by providing a table of the results of the tendering process;

b)      details of the open procurement scheme used and,

c)      the European Law under which the procurement scheme was carried out.

51.  In a Press Briefing dated 14 January 2011 it is stated that a “number of specialist companies” are being used by ONS to “provide specific services for the census”.  Please provide;

a)      details of the specialist companies being used and

b)      the specific services being offered by those companies.

52.  In a Press Briefing dated 14 January 2011 it is stated “the contract has created around 1,500 jobs in the UK”.  Please provide the following;

a)      which agency was used for the criminal records checks (CRB) on each of these staff;

b)      the net cost per CRB check per head;

c)      the registration number that the ONS has with the Criminal Records Bureau.

53.  In a Press Briefing dated 14 January 2011 it is stated “the contract has created around 1,500 jobs in the UK”. Please state how the data protection issues of these staff and their “secure employment records” are to be stored in compliance with the principles of the Data Protection Act 1998.

54.  Please confirm or deny that the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007 section 39 subsection 4 would allow disclosure of personal information to any and/or all of the following:

a)      The 56 geographical and 8 non-geographical UK Police Forces and in particular the Devon and Cornwall Police who are currently owned by the corporation known as International Business Machines (IBM).

b)      The three UK Intelligence Agencies (MI5, MI6 and GCHQ).

c)      The Department for Work and Pensions.

d)      Private investigator working for the Department for Work and Pensions to hunt down alleged benefits cheats?

e)      Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs tax investigators.

f)       “Approved” Insurance Industry “anti-fraud” investigators / private investigators.

g)      The Home Office Borders and Immigration Agency.

h)      The Serious Organised Crime Agency (either for domestic investigations into Serious Crimes, or for these and also for minor investigations if requested by a Foreign Law Enforcement agency under Mutual Legal Assistance treaties).

i)        Lawyers in civil Court Cases e.g. for Divorce or Libel or Copyright Infringement etc.

j)        Local Authority Trading Standards departments.

k)      Local Authority Environmental Health departments.

55.  In relation to the notice on the front of the Household Questionnaire which reads “Your personal information is protected by law”.  Please provide details of which laws apply to the protection of personal information.

56.  With reference to the further notice on the front of the Household Questionnaire which reads “Census information is kept confidential for 100 years”.  Please confirm the method by which the paper forms will be handled following the capture of the information into electronic form;

1. If the paper is to be stored, please confirm under what circumstances storage will be carried out;
2. If the paper is to be recycled, please confirm under what circumstances recycling will be carried out;
3. Confirm or deny whether the physical form will be kept as secure as you say the ONS intends to keep the electronic data.

57.  Please confirm or deny that the census form constitutes a contract.

58.  With reference to the claim “Census information is kept confidential for 100 years": - As this would mean that when we send these sealed forms back to the address, they are securely stored, and will remain unexamined by anyone for 100 years, is this offer to contract not fraudulent, and therefore null and void?

59.  Given that individuals have been criminalised under UK Terrorism legislation for causing information to be brought together by being accused that in compiling such information (even if it be in the public domain) they are assisting potential terrorists - please confirm or deny that by providing information via the census form, I will not be providing information to a foreign power who might have access to that data and so gain an advantage over this Sovereign nation.

60.  As it is an offence to interact with a terrorist group, please confirm or deny that Lockheed Martin fits the Government’s interpretation of a terrorist group.

61.  Please confirm or deny that I would be committing an offence of Treason if I were to willingly furnish a Foreign power with such information, and in English law please confirm or deny that that it is acceptable, if not our duty, to commit a lesser offence, in order to prevent a greater offence.

62.  In order to maintain equality under law, please provide to me the exact same information required from me pertaining to each and every individual who has, is or ever will handle the census information in whatever possible form.

63.  Given the premise that “time is money”, please provide documented proof under what authority the census must be completed in my own private time and at my own expense

64.  Please provide documented proof that I cannot charge a fee in advance for the provision of my time and personal information for the purposes of the census. Failure to do so will result in an invoice being issued which must be settled in advance prior to the completion of the census.

Please provide your response in the form of a “Statement of Truth”, sworn under penalty of perjury and upon your full commercial liability within seven (7) consecutive days of receipt of this Notice. If your ‘full’ response conforming to the above criteria is not received, within this appointed time it will be deemed a tacit agreement by virtue of your acquiescence that this Census is unlawful and that there is no obligation to participate, either as a Common Law sentient human being or as the representative for the Legal Fiction identity and any further correspondence or communication on this matter must cease immediately.

With reference to Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, any attempt to contact me or “The Occupier” regarding this matter after the appointed time will be in breach of these acts and will render you guilty of harassment and blackmail which may result in you being reported to the relevant bodies.

Please also note that any attempt to contact me or “The Occupier” by telephone regarding this matter after the appointed time you will also be in breach of the Wireless Telegraphy Act (1949) which may result in you being reported to both Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading and may also constitute a criminal offence under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003.

Finally, you do not, nor have you ever had, my permission to use or process my personal data in any way, and so pursuant to the Data Protection Act 1998, I hereby demand that you cease use of any and all data with regard to me or “The Occupier”, and that you immediately destroy all of my data held on your records. Failure to do so will result in a report being submitted to The Information Commissioner for Data Protection breaches.

The census form has been respectfully returned unopened. Please reissue only if or when all of the above points and questions have been addressed in full and all the required conditions have been met.

Sincerely without malice, ill will, vexation or frivolity.

The OCCUPIER

Without any admission of any liability whatsoever, and with all natural, inalienable, rights reserved.

Errors & omissions excepted.

Copies of this Notice of Conditional Acceptance have also been sent to:

  

Census Customer Services, ONS, Segensworth Road, Titchfield, Fareham, Hampshire - PO15 5RR
And:    FREEPOST 2011 Census, Processing Centre, UK