November 16, 2011

That Pesky Article 61

You've got to hand it to the Barons: they really knew what they were doing way back in the mists of time.

But do YOU appreciate what they did for us? Every time I mention Magna Carta 1215 it ruffles feathers, so I am going to mention it again. Or rather, one man's interpretation of it. More specifically, that pesky Article 61.

Have a look:


Lawful Rebellion.

"Some one recently asked me the question; what is Lawful Rebellion?

Rebellion in itself has a number of different meanings and is in fact quite close to another word that seems to be on everyone’s lips; Revolution. Defined meaning of Rebellion;
  1. Refusal to accept some authority or code or convention.
  2. An act or show of defiance toward an authority or established government.
Defined meaning of Lawful;
  1. Being within the law; allowed by law: lawful methods of dissent. (The lawful refusal to conform to the authority that is unjust)
Under article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 (the founding document of our Constitution) we have a right to enter into lawful rebellion if we feel we are being governed unjustly. Contrary to common belief our Sovereign and her government are only there to govern us and not to rule us and this must be done within the constraint of our Common Law and the freedoms asserted to us by such Law, nothing can become law in this country if it falls outside of this simple constraint.

Article 61 shows quite clearly who really holds the power in this country, that being quite simply us the people; we have Sovereignty not any Parliament and nor can this be taken from us by any Parliament who claim to have taken the people’s Sovereignty. As defined above any act passed by a Parliament to remove the power the people possess, or to remove the power from the point of constraint we invested the power in, is invalid as it falls outside of the constraint laid down by Common/Constitutional Law.

This is a simple safeguard put in place to protect our freedoms under said law and to never allow such freedoms to be removed or diminished. So in reality any Act, Statute and subsequent law or legislation formed by these actions, that effects our freedoms asserted to us, is quite evidently unjust, invalid and most certainly illegal.

By invoking article 61 we are quite clearly stating that we feel we are being governed unjustly and after giving the head of state (Her Majesty) 40 day’s to correct this, if this is not corrected, then we can simply enter into lawful rebellion and we do this under the full protection of our Constitutional Law.
Lawful rebellion allows quite simply for the following recourse;
  1. Full refusal to pay any forms of Tax, Fines and any other forms of monies to support and/or benefit said unlawful governance of this country.
  2. Full refusal to abide by any Law, Legislation or Statutory Instrument invalidly put in place by said unlawful governance that is in breech of the Constitutional safeguard.
  3. To hinder in any way possible all actions of the treasonous government of this land, who have breeched the Constitutional safeguard; defined with no form of violence in anyway, just lawful hindrance under freedom asserted by Constitutional Law and Article 61.
Above are listed the three main ways we can as a people rely upon article 61 and what this allows for. The British people were given over 700 years ago a Law to use as there recourse when faced with either a Parliamentary dictatorship, or a Sovereign trying to rule by Divine Right, which amounts to the same thing. We have a right, and a birth right at that, to be governed properly under our birth right law and no other and certainly not by laws introduced on the pretence of being British Law, when in fact all laws passed since 1973 have been European laws in the guise of British law. We have a right to freedom within our true law and no Parliament can remove this for they were not present in its implementation nor did it need any Parliament, or any Parliament involvement, this was quite simply a deal struck between the people and a Sovereign, a deal which can never be broken.

The traitors that reside in the Parliament of this country only fear one thing and that quite simply is us the people and they know that they can never defend themselves, or defend their treasonous actions, lies and deceit against the power of the people, asserted by and given by, the founding document of our Constitution Magna Carta 1215. They realize, as many others do, that once the British public grasps the power of Magna Carta in both hands and start to use it in their defense; their game is quite simply up.

What does Magna Carta stand for?

In stands for freedom, that the people have Sovereignty that cannot be removed by anyone and it stands for the only real true rule of law; that no one, without exception, is above the law.

What does Article 61 (Lawful Rebellion) stand for? You have Sovereignty, realize it, and use it."

Taken from here.


The writing isn't mine and I don't agree with every single word, but it's good enough to make the government quake. And if they don't quake, they simply haven't grasped its magnitude. (See what I did there?).

Anyhoo, Art 61 is a vital tool. Use it or don't. Just know that it exists, and know also that you are actually obliged to use it. Assuming that you fully comprehend what treason means, who committed that treason, and that you have a duty to do something about it once you do know. This crime has now been reported at over 80 police stations. Unsurprisingly, they have done nothing. Which makes them guilty of misprision of treason. They are now criminals and we shall not forget that when the day of reckoning dawns.

It constantly amazes me that people do not get into this, body and soul. If we all did this we could take back all the power we need to delete 40 years of crap and get our house in order.

Because let's face it, this shit cannot and must not continue.

Be a hero. Enter Lawful Rebellion today.

Future generations will erect statues in your honour.

CR.

30 comments:

Jo. Smith said...

Fantastic stuff, taken from an incredibly informative website. Thanks for posting Captain, people need to read and act

SBC said...

Wasn't article 61 removed from all later MC's?

Captain Ranty said...

Thanks Jo.

Captain Ranty said...

SBC,

No-one* had the power to remove anything.

It remains valid.

*Except the people. And they certainly didn't remove it.

CR.

Anonymous said...

I always read your posts with great interest, but one thing puzzles me: how do you refuse to pay tax when your employer takes it from your salary?

SBC said...

"It remains valid."

You certainly believe that I know (and respect and admire you for it) but belief and opinion aren't fact and personally I'd say: it remains valid right up to the point where your car is crushed for 'just saying NO' to road tax and you get Section 3'd.

An Old Sucker said...

Thank you,
61 is now my favourite number, used to be 69 but getting a bit old for that sort of malarkey…..so..

Captain Ranty said...

Anon (16:35),

I often explain to readers that I have not refused to pay all taxes. I have refused to pay some on a case by case basis.

It is tricky withholding anything from HMRC and I am not (yet) equipped to stop all taxation.

I take this one fight at a time.

Slowly, slowly, get rid of monkey on backy.

CR.

Captain Ranty said...

SBC,

It is not a belief. It is a simple truth.

Ask yourself this: if you were the govt would you tell me it was valid?

And if it IS invalid, how do you explain 86 Peers using it in 2001? Amongst them several barristers and many lawyers.

Someone is telling porkies.

I don't know about you but I suspect it might just be the govt and its lickspittles.

CR.

Captain Ranty said...

AOS,

It's only a reduction of 8.

Manageable by all of us, whatever age we have attained!

CR.

Anonymous said...

Captain Ranty ?

What Laws are you going to follow after following No 61 etc.

Like this:

The BCG keeps going on and on about the Magna Carta nonsense. How is anyone supposed to learn anything about Laws from that and other Talmudic nonsense, more and more case law, adding error-to-error, providing cushy corrupt ponzi scheme quango jobs for the boys making it up as they go along. You can’t win using their legislation and the Magna Carta or the bill of so called rights on your site, an indoctrinated high school kid could see that much. It’s just not good enough.

Anarchy? Because no one can possibly follow the above as there is no substance to it.

Captain Ranty said...

Anon (17:12),

I only need one law:

Do no harm.

By extension, all other laws are superfluous. It covers everything.

If you genuinely think the Magna Carta is nonsense then this is not the place for you.

CR.

nominedeus said...

Up the Magna Carta I say stand for what is right and don't back down. It really is time that TPTB were putinto the place they should reside Jail...

NewsboyCap said...

Anon @ 17:12

So if the Magna Carta is nonsense and lacks substance, what do you propose in it's stead? Some new age 'we should all love each other' mother earth worship?

SBC

I would presume that you are a policyman with your references to Statutes and Govt. policy, plus the reference to faith.Such indoctrinated views are understandable from a servant with only his masters views allowed at the station or from training courses.

James Higham said...

Article 61 can lead, these days, to Room 101 ... but not if everyone embraces it. There's the rub.

Captain Ranty said...

Newsy,

UDHR (Art 8, I think) gives us eggzackerly the same rights.

If you are disinclined to trust MC1215 you still have lawful excuse.

Go to it.

Not SBC of course. He/she is still awaiting permission.

CR.

Captain Ranty said...

Indy,

Eggfuckingzackly.

CR.

Captain Ranty said...

James,

You are right, of course.

Most of us are well and truly Borged.

There are none so blind, as them that will not see. Or something.

CR.

Anonymous said...

"Article 61 can lead, these days, to Room 101 ... but not if everyone embraces it. There's the rub."

Agreed.

"I only need one law:

Do no harm."

Which is why you need In Law something worthwhile for every one, preventions, resolution and then deterrents for all aspects of Life and order. And it’s all there for the seeking.

Captain Ranty said...

Anon (20:38),

Back in the day judges had a brain. They were encouraged/obliged to use common sense. And mostly, they did.

When they had a nasty man in front of them, they sentenced him proportionately.

Life was good. Those who caused harm, or caused loss or injury, or screwed people over with their contracts, were punished.

The judge (and usually a jury) decided.

All was good.

But lately, any kiddie-fiddlers that come before the court are sent away with a badge of honour, or a medal, because a great many judges fiddle with kids. Or take drugs. Or are complete arseholes themselves.

Nowadays most of us are presumed guilty long before we get to court. IF we get to court. They invented a system of FPN's and PCN's and NIP's which are unlawful from the word "go".

Our law says that we cannot be found guilty until/unless we are brought before 12 good men and true. They simply by-pass this these days and we are guilty because some dickhead, somewhere, says we are.

The law is fucked.

We need to fix it.

CR.

NewsboyCap said...

Captain

I am a firm believer in the power of Article 61, without such a right we would be living under a Dictatorship. That gubmints think they can repeal such rights is dictatorship in the making. UDHR is but an affirmation of ancient rights trodden on by Gubmints.
Why would the UN support the Arab springs if not upholding the very rights they support?
SBC needs permission from his masters-ACPO- before he is allowed to think!

Life Coach For Success said...

Great post CR.
One thing requires clarifying and that is the LAW.
All things being equal we DO need laws however the plethora of laws we have right now is not on.
Some one mentioned having ones car crushed for saying 'NO', what fucking planet is this one on? Has anyone happened to see the state of our roads? or the ratio of speed cameras to pot holes and signs. Just where does the road tax go? and before you say we should pay more to repair and increase, 40 years ago the road tax was adequate 'PER PERSON' to maintain the surfaces and NOW there are 100 time more = MORE TAX for repairs etc. NO the tax goes to pay exorbatant salaries and in some cases to people who are just none entities.

LAWS, back to the problem, do we go back to the dark ages? NO we don't we move forward, we create as we always have done, there are and always will be criminals but 'I' don't have to be targeted as a criminal just as 99% of the population does not have to be targeted to catch the 1%. The police should DO their fucking job and stop victimising the rest of us who work for a SLAVERY (salary).

The one thing those who do a job that produces 'NOTHING' forget is that we are ALL responsible for ourselves and if we come unstuck we PAY the penalty, I for one do not wish nor want the government to take responsibility for me, for one thing it costs too much and wastes too much time and effort.

Life can be real easy, the government and their laws are just complicating what is and has been just dandy for thousands of years. The Magna Carta, at the time gave us the option of and to redress wrongs, it put us on an equal and rightful footing.
To those that think we need herding and controlling I say they can just fuck off and live somewhere else because we in england (Albion) have managed for centuries without interference from a KNOB in Brussels.
NB, For those that don't know, councillors and politicians used to do the job they do now for free while holding down a productive job. This changed in the early eighties when it was proposed and passed that the parliament be made a permanent job, this was done without referendum and without the vote or agreement of 'we the people'. THIS should be redressed.

Last NOTE, the Magna Carta stands in full as it has for millenia and is confirmed by our 'constitutional' monarch and by quite a few constitutional lawyers and many many parliamentarians, PUBLICLY and explicitly.
Does it ALL remain standing? YES, however we use what we need, the rest of it is there if required.

Namaste, rev; (thanks for the platform CR)

Anonymous said...

"Life was good. Those who caused harm, or caused loss or injury, or screwed people over with their contracts, were punished."

Agreed but we did let ourselves down, even when many Brits went to start afresh, because we should have all been more self governing, with the right to arrest and not rely on judges, police, policy makers, etc. We all should have sort Sovereign rights rather than a corporate Marxist/Fascist crown state as so-called Sovereign.


Who would want to be enslaved to debt, be killed in many wars (Perpetual Commerce Through Perpetual War) and have no free land etc?

And not see simple things like this:

The US Con-stitution: was founded on Biblical Laws, but omitted some fine detail and also missed out some of the weightier Laws, such as Usury and how the “year of release” prevents the issuers of currency-- (bullion by weight and volume; gold, silver) or credit taking advantage of it (although credit from thin air can still be issued to corrupt vested interest groups; paper, numbers on a computer screen)-- by the action of the people not paying debts or interest, as it is only a means of debit exchange person to person, so no debt is owed to the issuers/bankers.

It also missed the Law on land distribution; so even farmers would not exchange money for land, as all families would be entitled to free land with a proper title and a means of a set temporary lease for the use of excess land, but not the land itself, depending on what the families wanted to do with the land, farm it (then they could lease in more) or whatever (they could lease out a portion of their share) so long as they didn’t cause harm, loss, injury etc. To use some modern names “Permaculture” for example, the land can lay fallow (Seven; completely) all years and old “Foggage farming”, where the cattle, sheep livestock stay out on pasture all year (no hay making, no mucking out, very little work.)
High yields no chemical fertiliser or GM.

The Law on “enemies foreign and domestic” was wrong, as only enemies domestic was needed and defence from invasion (to set an example for other nations to do likewise.) Some correction was attempted with Allodial title for private property with no dues or taxes payable to anyone (so it can’t be misused; which is why all tax is unlawful) but was quashed (people would have the means to pay for diligent infrastructure and or services easily if it was not for Usury; which includes taxes. Just to mention a few.

Anonymous said...

Back in the day judges had a brain. They were encouraged/obliged to use common sense. And mostly, they did.

"When they had a nasty man in front of them, they sentenced him proportionately.

Life was good. Those who caused harm, or caused loss or injury, or screwed people over with their contracts, were punished.

The judge (and usually a jury) decided."

Agreed but we did let ourselves down, even when many Brits went to start afresh, because we should have all been more self governing, with the right to arrest and not rely on judges, police, policy makers, etc. We all should have sort Sovereign rights rather than a corporate Marxist/Fascist crown state as so-called Sovereign.

The rest of the post will be in the spam box because some word will not post, as the web is getting more censored.

Anonymous said...

If I misspell some words it may post:

The US Con-stitution: was founded on Biblical Laws, but omitted some fine detail and also missed out some of the weightier Laws, such as Usury and how the “year of release” prevents the issuers of currency--(bullion by weight and volume; gold, silver) or credit taking advantage of it (although credit from thin air can still be issued to corrupt vested interest groups; paper, numbers on a computer screen)-- by the action of the people not paying debts or interest, as it is only a means of debit exchange person to person, so no debt is owed to the issuers/bankers.

It also missed the Law on land distribution; so even farmers would not exchange money for land, as all families would be entitled to free land with a proper title and a means of a set temporary lease for the use of excess land, but not the land itself, depending on what the families wanted to do with the land, farm it (then they could lease in more) or whatever (they could lease out a portion of their share) so long as they didn’t cause harm, loss, injury etc. To use some modern names “Permaculture” for example, the land can lay fallow (Seven; completely) all years and old “Foggage farming”, where the cattle, sheep livestock stay out on pasture all year (no hay making, no mucking out, very little work.)
High yields no chemical fertiliser/insecticides or GM.

The Law on “enemie foreign and domestic” was wrong, as only nemies domestic was needed and defence from invasion (to set an example for other nations to do likewise.) Some correction was attempted with Allodial title for private property with no dues or taxes payable to anyone (so it can’t be misused) but was quashed (people would have the means to pay for diligent infrastructure and or services easily if it was not for Usury; which includes taxes. Just to mention a few.

But people are quick to say oh eligion a word that is not even in biblical

And also every one has beliefs, even atheists.

And what Laws would people prefer for themselves and family?

Not this, surely:

So who would want to be enslaved to debt, be killed in many wars (Perpetua Commerce Through Perpetual Wa) and have no free land etc?

Anonymous said...

If I misspell some words it may post:

The US Con-stitution: was founded on Biblical Laws, but omitted some fine detail and also missed out some of the weightier Laws, such as Usury and how the “year of release” prevents the issuers of currency--(bullion by weight and volume; gold, silver) or credit taking advantage of it (although credit from thin air can still be issued to corrupt vested interest groups; paper, numbers on a computer screen)-- by the action of the people not paying debts or interest, as it is only a means of debit exchange person to person, so no debt is owed to the issuers/bankers.

It also missed the Law on land distribution; so even farmers would not exchange money for land, as all families would be entitled to free land with a proper title and a means of a set temporary lease for the use of excess land, but not the land itself, depending on what the families wanted to do with the land, farm it (then they could lease in more) or whatever (they could lease out a portion of their share) so long as they didn’t cause harm, loss, injury etc. To use some modern names “Permaculture” for example, the land can lay fallow (Seven; completely) all years and old “Foggage farming”, where the cattle, sheep livestock stay out on pasture all year (no hay making, no mucking out, very little work.)
High yields no chemical fertiliser/insecticides or GM.

Anonymous said...

The Law on “enemie foreign and domestic” was wrong, as only nemies domestic was needed and defence from invasion (to set an example for other nations to do likewise.) Some correction was attempted with Allodial title for private property with no dues or taxes payable to anyone (so it can’t be misused) but was quashed (people would have the means to pay for diligent infrastructure and or services easily if it was not for Usury; which includes taxes. Just to mention a few.

But people are quick to say oh eligion a word that is not even in biblical

And also every one has beliefs, even atheists.

And what Laws would people prefer for themselves and family?

Not this, surely:

So who would want to be enslaved to debt, be killed in many wars (Perpetua Commerce Through Perpetual Wa) and have no free land etc?

The Talking Clock said...

And thus, my friend Captain Ranty was awarded my blog's 'Quote of the Day' honour.

Anonymous said...

Have you spread your eyes over this yet cappy? Things are moving(fucking hope so)
Tells you why you shouldn't pay any tax

http://www.courtofrecord.org.uk/gicor/record/HMQ-7/Affidavit_of_Michael_Burke_2011-10-10.pdf

Captain Ranty said...

Anon (10:17),

I have just read it.

What a fantastic document.

I will create a post for it now.

Thanks for the link!

CR.