Those Who Would Rule

Funtime's over. Back to work.

The following piece was written by Bob at The Magna Carta Society and it neatly details what went wrong, and why. 

Read it, then share it with everyone:

In the United Kingdom the people are sovereign and the state is the servant of the people.

In Europe the state is sovereign and the people are subjects of the state. 

Under British law the people may do anything they wish providing there is no law against it.

Under European law the people may only do that which the law permits.

Under British law the people have inalienable rights and liberties  upheld by the Constitution.

Under European law the rights and liberties of the people are decided by the state which can withhold or withdraw such rights and liberties at its discretion.

In the United Kingdom a defendant charged with committing a crime remains innocent until proven guilty.

Under European law a defendant charged with a crime is assumed guilty unless he or she can prove his or her innocence.

In the countries of western Europe there are variations to be found in the laws of the individual countries, but the basic principle of the Code Napoleon exists throughout, the legacy of the Fascist style rule imposed by Napoleon following his conquest of western Europe. It is a system of law that well suits those who would aspire to rule. It is a system of law that is diametrically opposed to the British system of law which is created and upheld for the people by the people through democratic process, a system of democratic law that most certainly does not suit those who would aspire to rule. Never the less, there have been occasions over our long history when it was challenged by such aspirants but all such challenges only succeeded in strengthening the people's resolve to sustain their own sovereign powers over their own destiny. The challenge of King John in the thirteenth century resulted in his being obliged to sign the Magna Carta in 1215, and the challenge of Charles I in the seventeenth century cost him his life and the challenge of James II resulted in his exile and the Declaration and Bill of Rights 1688/9. Human nature being what it is however, there are always those who for personal gain aspire to rule. 

As social evolution gradually embraces the democratic principle and moves away from the system of the mass being ruled by the few so the frustration of those who would rule and control caused them to conspire in their endeavour to realise their ambitions. In the twentieth century the most prominent of these in western Europe was Adolf Hitler, but at the same time there were others and in Fascism they could see the means of uniting western Europe on the Napoleonic principle. As Hitler was preparing to demonstrate and acte out his belief that like Napoleon before him it was necessary to first crush the nations of Europe by military force, some of his supporters both in Europe and the United Kingdom were planning the economic and political measures that would be enforced following the physical conflict. In 1942 the German High Command  drew up the Europaischshafts Wirtshaftgemeinshaft, in all but small detail the blueprint for the Treaty of Rome 1957 which in 1972 the British traitors readily signed up to and by means of duplicity and stealth imposed on the British people, thus after a thousand years the sovereign independence and self rule of the British people was ended and with it the democratic principle that so threatened the aspirations of those who would rule.

Had this nation capitulated in 1939 as it did in 1972, an horrific war would have been averted, but it would have been at a cost, a cost we are now paying and experiencing, as the once good order and social stability this nation previously enjoyed now crumbles about us and the European model, the Code Napoleon, gradually takes precedent over our system of democratic process of law by the people for the people. The once United Kingdom is a nation undone, and seemingly no longer has the inclination nor will to restructure itself. 

What does the future hold for this nation 

What does the future hold for this nation of generally ordered, kind, peaceful and fair minded people, in which the order based on democratic principle has changed to an order of political intrusion, dictate and suppression? A change in which even our once helpful and friendly humble dustmen have become arrogantly confrontational and aggressive. A change in which the official wearing of a plastic helmet and yellow jacket gives licence to superior and patronising attitude. A change which has allowed 'the tail to waggeth the dog'.  

The time is now past when the people could have found and realised remedy by peaceful means. As the social order that their ancestors sacrificed so much to preserve for future generations wilts and crumbles about them, they are increasingly being pushed towards the violent confrontation that they believed could never happen or indeed be possible. Their self imposed rulers on the other hand have long been aware of such a possibility and have prepared well for it. The most noticeable move was when the police were taken out of the community, for a community integrated police force could not be relied upon to take militia styled pugilistic action against the people of their own communities. All was carried out under spurious claims of streamlining, efficiency and economising. Local police stations were closed down and police houses sold off. Improved mobility created an excuse for centralisation, away from public scrutiny and personal contact. No longer would exist that long established rapport between the people and their local Bobby on the beat, the man who knew everyone on his beat or in his parish and understood the workings and doings in his neighbourhood.

The long term plan became manifest in 1984 when ten thousand policemen were deployed to confront the miners who chose to strike in protest at losing their jobs and industry. To those northern miners the police were seen as a foreign army drafted in to put down their protest. It was an incitement to violent confrontation and the police were quick to engage it with mounted baton charges and the casualties were many. The confrontation, which became known as 'The Battle of Orgreave' was crushed as was our coal industry.

In 2002, The Fascist Tony Blair and his government proposed to follow the line of a previous Fascist, one Adolf Hitler and ban fox hunting. This was no animal welfare issue; just as Hitler had to break the catalyst and unity of the old aristocracy so Blair had to destroy the catalyst and unity of the country people, they being the last significant body of independent thinking. In their indignation at having their way of life and livelihoods challenged the newly formed Countryside Alliance mounted a protest march on Westminster which was supported and attended by 400,000 people. These were not high spirited reactionary students or militant union supporting workers, these were ordinary peace loving country people from all walks of life, marching in their own capitol, on their own streets to their own Parliament. It proved however to be too much for their self styled political masters and the police militia was called in and in strength, and again with little provocation struck out indiscriminately with pugilistic force against male and female, old and young. One should not dismiss too lightly the reports that appear from time to time claiming that the police have over the past few years acquired several thousand machine guns along with armoured vehicles.

It therefore seems inevitable that should the British people decide to take back their lawful sovereign independent supremacy and their right to self political determination and so  confront those who would so deny them their lawful rights and liberties, they will be dealt with in the same draconian and pugilistic manner by state militia posing as policemen. Never the less, there now seems little doubt that the good British people will and must face them or allow themselves to be gradually taken over by the European political model as created by Napoleon and later taken up and expanded by the Nazi Adolf Hitler and the Communist Joseph Stalin, a political model diametrically opposed to all that this nation stands for as a democratic and peace loving people, a principle that has for generations saved us from suffering the misery and anguish that has for centuries repeatedly bedevilled the peoples of Europe.  

Bob

The Magna Carta Society.