February 28, 2011

Evil vs Insane

Mary: Croft has added a correction to a post (of hers) that I linked to here a short time ago.

Here is a snippet:

“EVIL”  VS.  “INSANE”

"I have maintained for years that it is foolish for us to go to court. Frank has convinced me that I have been inaccurate.  What he has relayed to me is stunning news, yet, I ought not to have been surprised when I remember who the controllers (“minions”) really are. Frank is adamant that they are not “evil” because, of course, this is precisely how they want us to think of them. Why?  Because we fear evil––mostly because it is so foreign and enigmatic to us as we, by our nature, are not. Fear is one emotion upon which they thrive. They actually require low frequency emotions––fear, shame, guilt, anger, frustration–– from us, in order to function.

So, let’s stop calling the minions “evil” and call them “insane”.  How do we know they are “insane”?  Our insane world is a result of their insanity. Another good tip-off is that when we state, in court, what is true, they tend to order a “psychological evaluation”. Since what we want for another, we also want for ourselves (and vice versa), at some level of consciousness, they know that this is what they, themselves, require. Since the language of the psychiatrists they choose is designed to trick us, it is important that we ask questions, in order to establish what is really going on. So, in order for us to be certain about what we are being asked, in response to any question, from a psych, at a “psych eval”, we ought to clarify, “Are you asking……?  If we get a yes, only then should we respond.  Answering any question from anyone, without clarifying what is being asked, is crazy (so to speak), but from one of the minions, it is more insanity.

Evidence of their insanity and trickery is that they behave as if they want the opposite of what they really want. They do NOT want us to pay our mortgage, they do NOT want us to obey their alleged traffic laws, and they do NOT want us to go to court."

Please go and read the rest here.

Amazing stuff.

CR.

8 comments:

  1. I am curious to know what you think Capn regarding the EDP? Do you think it's worth sticking to my birth certificate and sending it to the GRO?

    I am willing to give it a try, but there doesn't seem to be much info about it's use over here at UK PLC.

    Canon 1566
    "No signature on an EDP is permitted by the TRUE PERSON as a signature is a sign of a Roman slave"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Think about the huge economic damage that we could inflict upon them by conforming very precisely. Now that would be a real revolution to end all revolutions!

    ReplyDelete
  3. NC,

    There is certainly no danger, no risk, of you doing exactly that. I really need to get my small brain around Ecclesiastical Deed Polls.

    Perhaps you could show us your (redacted) version?

    CR.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anon,

    That has been my game plan all along: beat them using their own insane rules.

    CR.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mr Numba Cruncha1 March 2011 at 19:33

    I will indeed Capn, bloody thumbprint and all!!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. NC,

    Never, ever, ever give them your thumbprint. Draw up a fee schedule and let them know they may have a thumb- or fingerprint for say, £1M.

    Your prints, your breath, your blood, urine and DNA are yours. Do not give them away for nothing.

    CR.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mr Numba Cruncha1 March 2011 at 20:35

    Those filthy little policymen already have my fingerprints and DNA from a previous encounter, one which ended up without charge may i add!!

    Apparently the thumbprint in blood is needed to infuse life into the paper, show that the blood flows. Sounds rather strange i know!!

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.