tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post2177995548315843599..comments2023-09-10T16:35:32.651+01:00Comments on Captain Ranty-Lawful Rebel: Captain Ranty: CriminalCaptain Rantyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07839241144954596066noreply@blogger.comBlogger34125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-69371402422604908312012-02-15T11:49:39.765+00:002012-02-15T11:49:39.765+00:00Hi cap'n, caught in the spin as we all are.
I ...Hi cap'n, caught in the spin as we all are.<br />I have a couple of AUTHORITIES handy if you feel the need to peruse them,they deal with the elements of a CRIME.<br />I also have a copy of the JP bench hand book, some interesting points within, 1.91 raises a VERY interesting thought in my mind(warning, dae'ye want inside nalas hiedmmmmmmm)gie's'a'shout if ye'like.<br />nalanalanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-73604747609515993602012-02-14T04:13:07.725+00:002012-02-14T04:13:07.725+00:00Fk my old boots! If I ever had any doubts about ho...Fk my old boots! If I ever had any doubts about how corrupt our pseudo-legal system is, those doubts have just gone straight to jail and have not passed GO! Big up's captain, Leggy and all the great comments ;)Stealthynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-79813655688626175842012-02-11T10:21:38.091+00:002012-02-11T10:21:38.091+00:00Thanks Chris.
I have read of several cases where ...Thanks Chris.<br /><br />I have read of several cases where they "win" on a technicality that should have seen the poor bugger should have walked away with no more being said or done.<br /><br />The maxim you quote is a good one and I use it often.<br /><br />This whole court appearance may be academic. They may have decided to use trickery back when they received my first notice. They have, however, stepped outside of the process and I really cannot see how they can convict now. I have done what they asked, but they have not responded. Under their own statutes they cannot rule in my absence. <br /><br />I consistently state that I am not bound by their rules, but they are.<br /><br />We will see.<br /><br />CR.Captain Rantyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07839241144954596066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-18953814750049364172012-02-11T00:04:34.914+00:002012-02-11T00:04:34.914+00:00Captain
With reguard to SH's post at 20:17 I...Captain <br /> With reguard to SH's post at 20:17 I've been stung by this one and have been moved to raise a couple of points on your blog,First however to put my points in context I remind you all of the following maxim "Let he who would be decived be decived". 1)The Police, prosicution and Courts ect: claim that documentation sent by first class is "deemed to have been served. In my case I had challenged a NIP for October served in January by Recorded delivery(outside the fourteen day deadline)in court the Prosicutor claimed that a NIP had been served within fourteen days by first class post and that the NIP By recorded dilivery was a courtesy. As I was focused on the fourteen day issue and the recorded delivery being three months out of date it threw my train of thought and I lost my case.Here is the mistake I made 2)In case Law apart from delivery by hand only Recorded Delivery or Registered Letter is irributtable, service by first or second class post is rebuttable. By not challenging(objecting)to the claim that first class post was sufficent I had efectively consented to the prosicuters position even though I had the right of it. They are using sheer cheek to bluf their way to a win and if you'r not swiched on it worksChris Elmesnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-78609109179981071422012-02-10T23:16:52.747+00:002012-02-10T23:16:52.747+00:00Dem is some sneaky fucking wankers!!Dem is some sneaky fucking wankers!!Alfienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-79682919952619206952012-02-10T18:43:53.427+00:002012-02-10T18:43:53.427+00:00@ Dan Capp - yes I got where you were coming from ...@ Dan Capp - yes I got where you were coming from but only after I made a hasty comment; hence my comment at 20:50 on 9th.Steven UKnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-77134337933024573932012-02-10T14:20:22.259+00:002012-02-10T14:20:22.259+00:00just let em know captain as a freeman you choose a...just let em know captain as a freeman you choose as you go with regards to road saftey, and you aint got any jurisdiction over me anyway.<br /><br />just add that if any loved one of mine gets killed because of speeding then i will expect the law to be enforced and i will completley regognise this court and it will have my full backing to convict the speeding driver .<br /><br /><br />sorted.dickie doubledaynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-68201089062316894242012-02-10T12:40:15.901+00:002012-02-10T12:40:15.901+00:00I bit off topic but here is a very interesting and...I bit off topic but here is a very interesting and thought provoking article<br />http://www.activistpost.com/2012/02/revolutionaries-best-way-to-tear-down.html<br /><br />Best of luck CR<br /><br />TBAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-74293440817339398962012-02-10T12:22:53.890+00:002012-02-10T12:22:53.890+00:00@Steven: I was speaking figuratively. Literally sp...@Steven: I was speaking figuratively. Literally speaking, you're right. But we must ask why, if these contraventions of statute really are 'crimes', are we not dealt with like a real crime should be dealt with.<br /><br />Crimes of loss, harm or injury should require immediate, direct attention... surely. Correspondence with the police force that often spans months keeps hundreds of thousands locked in the legal process and makes it seem normal for a large portion of the country to be in some stage of legal conviction. To me this screams of desensitisation, where we are being increasingly made to feel 'at home' with prosecution.DChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05387950319372236710noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-58890900441394831022012-02-10T10:09:08.130+00:002012-02-10T10:09:08.130+00:00indeed,their are many ways to skin a cat.
ps dont ...indeed,their are many ways to skin a cat.<br />ps dont let yours read this if it is of a sensative nature,or does not like flash photography...LOLpitano1noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-53022080427255762782012-02-10T09:55:39.029+00:002012-02-10T09:55:39.029+00:00Thanks mate!
I actually hope that they notify me ...Thanks mate!<br /><br />I actually hope that they notify me by post that they fucked me while I wasn't looking. They ignored their own process and I will have any conviction quashed.<br /><br />They are their own worst enemy.<br /><br />CR.Captain Rantyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07839241144954596066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-51038262284995997372012-02-10T09:51:31.155+00:002012-02-10T09:51:31.155+00:00hi capt.
i was going to wish you good luck.
but ...hi capt.<br /><br />i was going to wish you good luck.<br /><br />but as you know luck does not apply here.<br /><br />so i will just say `congratulations`<br />to you`for not grasping your ankles`<br />for the criminal justus system.<br /><br />i wont start preaching to the choir,but just add, with you 100%pitano1noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-19830261785123170612012-02-10T09:12:41.644+00:002012-02-10T09:12:41.644+00:00Chris,
No charges are listed. Just names.
CR.Chris,<br /><br />No charges are listed. Just names.<br /><br />CR.Captain Rantyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07839241144954596066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-79806014054924592952012-02-10T09:11:30.215+00:002012-02-10T09:11:30.215+00:00Leggy,
On the site I am listed as "accused&q...Leggy,<br /><br />On the site I am listed as "accused" and the sub-heading is CRIMINALS. Big, bold, capitalised lettering. Is it possible that a percentage of those 85 listed may not be guilty at all? I think so.<br /><br />They can list me as a criminal all day long and forever more, AFTER they find me guilty.<br /><br />Not that I care that a corrupt system would deem me guilty of anything. I hold them all in contempt.<br /><br />CR.Captain Rantyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07839241144954596066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-74924871528553186292012-02-10T09:07:12.187+00:002012-02-10T09:07:12.187+00:00SH,
As I have said so many times, they are all in...SH,<br /><br />As I have said so many times, they are all in the same club.<br /><br />That is why they advise you to roll over all the time.<br /><br />CR.Captain Rantyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07839241144954596066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-36737164198457337092012-02-10T08:06:46.684+00:002012-02-10T08:06:46.684+00:00what is the case listed as - what 'charge'...what is the case listed as - what 'charge' ?<br /><br />ChrisAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-81117064129537616962012-02-10T01:13:40.323+00:002012-02-10T01:13:40.323+00:00So you only have to be accused to be a 'crimin...So you only have to be accused to be a 'criminal' now? Once, you only earned that title after being convicted.<br /><br />Then again, all of us are regarded as criminals all the time, these days.<br /><br />Well, I have always done every job assigned to me to the best of my ability. Let them give me the job title of 'criminal' and see what bloody well happens.<br /><br />It's almost certain since there'll be tobacco plants in my garden again this year.Leg-ironhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04932361799889315359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-68256661519950275182012-02-09T21:16:10.537+00:002012-02-09T21:16:10.537+00:00We only used the lawyer for postal address, we ins...We only used the lawyer for postal address, we instructed them and boy did we instruct them. HMRC then offered settlement before going to court ... rejected ... upped offer ... rejected ... upped offer .... accepted.<br /><br />This was all against 'our' lawyers advice. They said we couldn't win at the very beginning and drop it. Then they advised us to accept every offer as they turned up. We 'instructed' them to do as we say.<br /><br />Horses for courses CR :)Smoking Hothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04534745989363293923noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-71745107987513129262012-02-09T20:55:51.245+00:002012-02-09T20:55:51.245+00:00Steven UK,
No problem.
As SH said, this game is ...Steven UK,<br /><br />No problem.<br /><br />As SH said, this game is rigged, and is littered with pitfalls.<br /><br />CR.Captain Rantyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07839241144954596066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-3263637234502618412012-02-09T20:54:00.194+00:002012-02-09T20:54:00.194+00:00SH,
I hear that they also say (when you are in co...SH,<br /><br />I hear that they also say (when you are in court) "I see no such paperwork". It is right in front of them but turned upside down so all they "see" is the blank paper. This is why I add a 1p stamp and my autograph on the back of every page I expect to use in court.<br /><br />I am hugely pleased that you won, and deeply saddened that you had to use a lawyer.<br /><br />Word on the (Freeman) street is that if you use a lawyer you are declaring to the court that you are incompetent to handle your own affairs.<br /><br />I imagine it was the BAR that came up with the axiom "the lawyer who represents himself in court has a fool for a client".<br /><br />Thanks for the good wishes!<br /><br />CR.Captain Rantyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07839241144954596066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-48421748268855757972012-02-09T20:50:14.873+00:002012-02-09T20:50:14.873+00:00Thanks for your answer CR. That clarifies it for ...Thanks for your answer CR. That clarifies it for me. <br /><br />(and sorry to Dan Capp for my rather flipant initial comment)Steven UKnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-68993728942593496272012-02-09T20:43:17.573+00:002012-02-09T20:43:17.573+00:00Get this, we then had to apply to the judge who...Get this, we then had to apply to the judge who'd said we'd lost and ask his permission to re-hear the case. lt was totally at his discretion ... the missing letters and false information could not be used as an excuse ... an excuse? ffs!<br /><br />So we changed our tactics and used a law firm to apply for us and basically act as a postal address. From then on we had no problems, no missing letters, direct communication with the court at all times.<br /><br />HMRC? ... we won!<br /><br />Representing yourself is fraught with pitfalls ... they have a closed-shop and what to keep it that way! Justice? ... no-ones interested! <br /><br />Best of luck, mate!Smoking Hothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04534745989363293923noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-30763560484644263702012-02-09T20:17:48.578+00:002012-02-09T20:17:48.578+00:00Not exactly rosy here in England. Any letter sent ...Not exactly rosy here in England. Any letter sent by the courts is deemed received to whoever they send it to. No proof necessary ... if they say they sent it ... they say you received it ... period!<br /><br />However when you send anything to them the same doesn't apply even if you send it recorded delivery or take it in personally and deliver it by hand. <br /><br />They 'lost' both of the above in an action we were taking. We got round that and was waiting for a date of the hearing. We phoned and called in but no date had yet been set. <br /><br />3 days after our last contact with the court (still no hearing date) we received a letter from the court ... hurray!<br /><br />Opened the letter to find we'd lost because we didn't turn up to the hearing 10 days previously! l kid you not.<br /><br />We were taking the HMRC to court. :)Smoking Hothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04534745989363293923noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-47796580084116891702012-02-09T20:11:35.671+00:002012-02-09T20:11:35.671+00:00OR,
We are dealing with the spineless here.
BTW,...OR,<br /><br />We are dealing with the spineless here.<br /><br />BTW, I checked out the Scotland Act 1995 S153(1) and Pete is quite right. I must be present. There are exceptions in S150A but I do not think any of them apply to me.<br /><br />CR.Captain Rantyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07839241144954596066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3271194216217582823.post-13320100864806048042012-02-09T19:16:59.785+00:002012-02-09T19:16:59.785+00:00Steven UK,
Thanks for the link. I remember seeing...Steven UK,<br /><br />Thanks for the link. I remember seeing it before.<br /><br />My jaw dropped then as well.<br /><br />CR.Captain Rantyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07839241144954596066noreply@blogger.com